• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

多学科疼痛管理项目对患者护理利用和护理成本的影响。

Impact of a multidisciplinary pain management program on patient care utilization and cost of care.

作者信息

Maeng Daniel D, Baylor Kelly, Bulger John B, Han John J

机构信息

Department of Epidemiology and Health Services Research, Geisinger, Danville, PA, USA,

出版信息

J Pain Res. 2018 Oct 18;11:2375-2383. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S177231. eCollection 2018.

DOI:10.2147/JPR.S177231
PMID:30425550
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6204849/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Chronic pain is a highly prevalent and costly condition with few proven treatment options. Since 2014, Geisinger's Department of Pain Medicine has implemented the Multidisciplinary Pain Program (MPP), which consists of a 3-day educational seminar followed by 12 months of comprehensive care. This study examines the impact of MPP on care utilization and cost between 2014 and 2016.

METHODS

A retrospective health insurance claims data analysis covering a 3-year period between January 2013 and December 2016. Among all patients referred to MPP during the period, a subset of those who were Geisinger Health Plan (GHP) members was identified (113 patients). Those who were GHP members and were referred to MPP after December 2016 served as the contemporaneous comparison group (69 patients). GHP's claims data for the corresponding period were analyzed on a per-member-per-month (PMPM) basis.

RESULTS

MPP was associated with US$754 PMPM reduction in total cost of care including prescription drug costs (=0.014) and US$846 reduction in total medical cost excluding prescription drugs (=0.006). These cost savings were attributable to reductions in utilization of high-end diagnostic imaging (52 per-1,000 members-per month; =0.015) and acute inpatient admissions (20 per-1,000 members-per month; =0.086).

CONCLUSION

Patients enrolled in MPP were less likely to use expensive diagnostic imaging and experienced fewer hospitalizations, resulting in total cost of care savings. These findings are consistent with the expectation that MPP improves health outcomes among patients suffering from chronic pain.

摘要

目的

慢性疼痛是一种非常普遍且成本高昂的疾病,经证实的治疗选择很少。自2014年以来,盖辛格疼痛医学部实施了多学科疼痛项目(MPP),该项目包括一个为期3天的教育研讨会,随后是12个月的全面护理。本研究考察了2014年至2016年间MPP对医疗服务利用和成本的影响。

方法

对2013年1月至2016年12月这3年期间的医疗保险理赔数据分析。在该期间所有转诊至MPP的患者中,确定了一部分盖辛格健康计划(GHP)成员(113名患者)。将2016年12月后转诊至MPP的GHP成员作为同期对照组(69名患者)。按成员每月(PMPM)对GHP同期的理赔数据进行分析。

结果

MPP使包括处方药成本在内的总护理成本每月每名成员降低754美元(=0.014),不包括处方药的总医疗成本降低846美元(=0.006)。这些成本节约归因于高端诊断成像的使用减少(每月每1000名成员52次;=0.015)和急性住院人数减少(每月每1000名成员20次;=0.086)。

结论

参加MPP的患者使用昂贵诊断成像的可能性较小,住院次数较少,从而节省了总护理成本。这些发现与MPP改善慢性疼痛患者健康结局的预期一致。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2f3f/6204849/098955e4c4d2/jpr-11-2375Fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2f3f/6204849/098955e4c4d2/jpr-11-2375Fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2f3f/6204849/098955e4c4d2/jpr-11-2375Fig1.jpg

相似文献

1
Impact of a multidisciplinary pain management program on patient care utilization and cost of care.多学科疼痛管理项目对患者护理利用和护理成本的影响。
J Pain Res. 2018 Oct 18;11:2375-2383. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S177231. eCollection 2018.
2
Patterns of health care utilization and cost before and after opioid overdose: findings from 10-year longitudinal health plan claims data.阿片类药物过量前后的医疗保健利用模式和成本:来自10年纵向健康计划索赔数据的发现
Subst Abuse Rehabil. 2017 Aug 16;8:57-67. doi: 10.2147/SAR.S135884. eCollection 2017.
3
Value of primary care diabetes management: long-term cost impacts.初级保健糖尿病管理的价值:长期成本影响
Am J Manag Care. 2016 Mar 1;22(3):e88-94.
4
The value of value-based insurance design: savings from eliminating drug co-payments.基于价值的保险设计的价值:消除药品自付费用带来的节省。
Am J Manag Care. 2016 Feb;22(2):116-21.
5
Impact of a value-based insurance design for physical therapy to treat back pain on care utilization and cost.基于价值的保险设计对物理治疗腰痛的护理利用和成本的影响。
J Pain Res. 2017 May 31;10:1337-1346. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S135813. eCollection 2017.
6
Cost savings and enhanced hospice enrollment with a home-based palliative care program implemented as a hospice-private payer partnership.通过作为临终关怀机构与私人支付方合作关系实施的居家姑息治疗项目实现成本节约和临终关怀登记人数增加。
J Palliat Med. 2014 Dec;17(12):1328-35. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2014.0184.
7
Analysis of Actual Versus Projected Medical Claims Under the First Year of ACA-Mandated Coverage.《平价医疗法案(ACA)强制医保第一年实际与预计医疗理赔分析》
Inquiry. 2016 Nov 17;53. doi: 10.1177/0046958016673252. Print 2016.
8
Cost and utilization analysis of a pediatric emergency department diversion project.儿科急诊科分流项目的成本与利用情况分析
Pediatrics. 2005 Nov;116(5):1075-9. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-2093.
9
Health care utilization patterns and costs for patients with hidradenitis suppurativa.患有化脓性汗腺炎患者的医疗保健利用模式和费用。
JAMA Dermatol. 2014 Sep;150(9):937-44. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2014.691.
10
Reducing long-term cost by transforming primary care: evidence from Geisinger's medical home model.通过医疗之家模式转变初级保健以降低长期成本:来自 Geisinger 的证据。
Am J Manag Care. 2012 Mar;18(3):149-55.

引用本文的文献

1
Patient and health service factors associated with enrollment in a multidisciplinary pain rehabilitation program: a retrospective cohort study.与多学科疼痛康复项目入组相关的患者和卫生服务因素:一项回顾性队列研究
Front Pain Res (Lausanne). 2025 Apr 10;6:1455792. doi: 10.3389/fpain.2025.1455792. eCollection 2025.
2
Integrated pain care models and the importance of aligning stakeholder values.综合疼痛护理模式以及使利益相关者价值观保持一致的重要性。
Pain Rep. 2024 Apr 17;9(3):e1160. doi: 10.1097/PR9.0000000000001160. eCollection 2024 Jun.
3
Determinants of responsiveness to multidisciplinary chronic pain management interventions: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis.

本文引用的文献

1
Chronic Pain as a Hypothetical Construct: A Practical and Philosophical Consideration.作为一种假设结构的慢性疼痛:实践与哲学思考
Front Psychol. 2017 Apr 27;8:664. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00664. eCollection 2017.
2
Getting "Unstuck": A Multi-Site Evaluation of the Efficacy of an Interdisciplinary Pain Intervention Program for Chronic Low Back Pain.摆脱困境:一项针对慢性下腰痛的跨学科疼痛干预项目疗效的多中心评估
Healthcare (Basel). 2016 Jun 14;4(2):33. doi: 10.3390/healthcare4020033.
3
Estimates of pain prevalence and severity in adults: United States, 2012.
多学科慢性疼痛管理干预措施反应性的决定因素:系统评价和荟萃分析方案。
BMJ Open. 2022 Sep 19;12(9):e057481. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-057481.
4
Multidisciplinary Firms and the Treatment of Chronic Pain: A Case Study of Low Back Pain.多学科公司与慢性疼痛治疗:以腰痛为例的案例研究
Front Pain Res (Lausanne). 2021 Nov 10;2:781433. doi: 10.3389/fpain.2021.781433. eCollection 2021.
2012年美国成年人疼痛患病率及严重程度估计
J Pain. 2015 Aug;16(8):769-80. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2015.05.002. Epub 2015 May 29.
4
Management of chronic pain in older adults.老年人慢性疼痛的管理
BMJ. 2015 Feb 13;350:h532. doi: 10.1136/bmj.h532.
5
Outcomes in pain medicine: a brief review.疼痛医学的结果:简要回顾。
Pain Ther. 2012 Dec;1(1):5. doi: 10.1007/s40122-012-0005-4. Epub 2012 Sep 29.
6
From Catastrophizing to Recovery: a pilot study of a single-session treatment for pain catastrophizing.从灾难化到恢复:单次治疗疼痛灾难化的初步研究。
J Pain Res. 2014 Apr 25;7:219-26. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S62329. eCollection 2014.
7
Providers' roles in enhancing patients' adherence to pain self management.提供者在增强患者疼痛自我管理依从性方面的作用。
Transl Behav Med. 2013 Mar;3(1):39-46. doi: 10.1007/s13142-012-0158-z.
8
The future of pain research, education, and treatment: a summary of the IOM report "Relieving pain in America: a blueprint for transforming prevention, care, education, and research".疼痛研究、教育和治疗的未来:国际医学科学院组织报告《缓解美国的疼痛:预防、护理、教育和研究改革蓝图》的总结
Transl Behav Med. 2012 Mar;2(1):6-8. doi: 10.1007/s13142-012-0110-2.
9
Patients as collaborators: using focus groups and feedback sessions to develop an interactive, web-based self-management intervention for chronic pain.患者作为合作者:使用焦点小组和反馈会议来开发一个互动的、基于网络的慢性疼痛自我管理干预措施。
Pain Med. 2013 Nov;14(11):1730-40. doi: 10.1111/pme.12200. Epub 2013 Jul 16.
10
Assessment of patients with chronic pain.慢性疼痛患者评估。
Br J Anaesth. 2013 Jul;111(1):19-25. doi: 10.1093/bja/aet124.