Gaebel W, Pietzcker A
Pharmacopsychiatry. 1985 May;18(3):235-9. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-1017372.
In an ongoing prospective investigation of the course and outcome of schizophrenia, the global functioning (employment, social contacts, symptoms) and rehospitalization rate of 72 patients were assessed one year after clinical discharge. With regard to chronicity of illness, the global outcome was better for first admissions than for multiple admissions. On controlling the patients' functioning one year before index admission, this difference did not hold true. Hence, there must be difference in the functioning of the two groups which dates back a rather long time. However, multiple admissions showed an actual downward trend in their work functioning (p less than 0.05). Rehospitalization rates of the two groups did not differ significantly (33% for first admissions versus 40% for multiple admissions). Evaluation of differences in drug-taking behavior revealed that patients with better global functioning tended to take their neuroleptics not as regularly as prescribed. Whereas for good functioning first admissions, taking into account, their better spontaneous course (rehospitalization rate 27%), an intermittent neuroleptic strategy may be in order, for multiple admissions the reversal seems to be true (rehospitalization rate for compliant patients 27%, for non-compliant patients 73%, p less than 0.01). However, a small group of good functioning multiple admissions did not have to be rehospitalized in spite of non-compliance, whereas the patients with the poorest function relapsed despite their compliance. We conclude that, whereas for first admissions long-term neuroleptic medication may not be generally indicated on account of their prognostic heterogeneity most of the multiple admissions will profit by this therapeutic strategy in respect of rehospitalization.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
在一项关于精神分裂症病程及转归的前瞻性研究中,对72例患者临床出院一年后的整体功能(就业、社交、症状)及再住院率进行了评估。就疾病的慢性程度而言,首次入院患者的整体转归优于多次入院患者。在控制患者入院前一年的功能状况后,这种差异不再成立。因此,两组患者在功能方面一定存在着可追溯到相当长时间之前的差异。然而,多次入院患者的工作功能实际上呈下降趋势(p<0.05)。两组的再住院率无显著差异(首次入院患者为33%,多次入院患者为40%)。对服药行为差异的评估显示,整体功能较好的患者服用抗精神病药物的规律性往往不如医嘱要求。鉴于首次入院且功能良好的患者有较好的自发病程(再住院率27%),采取间歇性抗精神病药物治疗策略可能是合适的;而对于多次入院患者,情况似乎相反(依从性好的患者再住院率27%,不依从的患者为73%,p<0.01)。然而,一小部分功能良好的多次入院患者尽管不依从却无需再次住院,而功能最差的患者尽管依从仍出现复发。我们得出结论,鉴于首次入院患者预后的异质性,长期使用抗精神病药物治疗可能并非普遍适用,而大多数多次入院患者采用这种治疗策略在预防再住院方面将有所获益。(摘要截选至250字)