Suppr超能文献

通过电子病历决策支持在初级保健中应用STOPP指南:强调数据质量重要性的随机对照试验

Applying STOPP Guidelines in Primary Care Through Electronic Medical Record Decision Support: Randomized Control Trial Highlighting the Importance of Data Quality.

作者信息

Price Morgan, Davies Iryna, Rusk Raymond, Lesperance Mary, Weber Jens

机构信息

LEAD Lab, Department of Family Practice, Island Medical Program, University of British Columbia, Victoria, BC, Canada.

University of Victoria, Victoria, BC, Canada.

出版信息

JMIR Med Inform. 2017 Jun 15;5(2):e15. doi: 10.2196/medinform.6226.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Potentially Inappropriate Prescriptions (PIPs) are a common cause of morbidity, particularly in the elderly.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to understand how the Screening Tool of Older People's Prescriptions (STOPP) prescribing criteria, implemented in a routinely used primary care Electronic Medical Record (EMR), could impact PIP rates in community (non-academic) primary care practices.

METHODS

We conducted a mixed-method, pragmatic, cluster, randomized control trial in research naïve primary care practices. Phase 1: In the randomized controlled trial, 40 fully automated STOPP rules were implemented as EMR alerts during a 16-week intervention period. The control group did not receive the 40 STOPP rules (but received other alerts). Participants were recruited through the OSCAR EMR user group mailing list and in person at user group meetings. Results were assessed by querying EMR data PIPs. EMR data quality probes were included. Phase 2: physicians were invited to participate in 1-hour semi-structured interviews to discuss the results.

RESULTS

In the EMR, 40 STOPP rules were successfully implemented. Phase 1: A total of 28 physicians from 8 practices were recruited (16 in intervention and 12 in control groups). The calculated PIP rate was 2.6% (138/5308) (control) and 4.11% (768/18,668) (intervention) at baseline. No change in PIPs was observed through the intervention (P=.80). Data quality probes generally showed low use of problem list and medication list. Phase 2: A total of 5 physicians participated. All the participants felt that they were aware of the alerts but commented on workflow and presentation challenges.

CONCLUSIONS

The calculated PIP rate was markedly less than the expected rate found in literature (2.6% and 4.0% vs 20% in literature). Data quality probes highlighted issues related to completeness of data in areas of the EMR used for PIP reporting and by the decision support such as problem and medication lists. Users also highlighted areas for better integration of STOPP guidelines with prescribing workflows. Many of the STOPP criteria can be implemented in EMRs using simple logic. However, data quality in EMRs continues to be a challenge and was a limiting step in the effectiveness of the decision support in this study. This is important as decision makers continue to fund implementation and adoption of EMRs with the expectation of the use of advanced tools (such as decision support) without ongoing review of data quality and improvement.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Clinicaltrials.gov NCT02130895; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02130895 (Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/6qyFigSYT).

摘要

背景

潜在不适当处方(PIPs)是发病的常见原因,在老年人中尤为如此。

目的

我们试图了解在常规使用的基层医疗电子病历(EMR)中实施的老年人处方筛查工具(STOPP)处方标准如何影响社区(非学术性)基层医疗实践中的PIP率。

方法

我们在对研究不了解的基层医疗实践中进行了一项混合方法、实用、整群、随机对照试验。第1阶段:在随机对照试验中,在16周的干预期内,40条全自动STOPP规则作为EMR警报实施。对照组未收到这40条STOPP规则(但收到其他警报)。通过OSCAR EMR用户组邮件列表和用户组会议亲自招募参与者。通过查询EMR数据PIPs评估结果。纳入了EMR数据质量探针。第2阶段:邀请医生参加1小时的半结构化访谈以讨论结果。

结果

在EMR中,40条STOPP规则成功实施。第1阶段:共招募了来自8个诊所的28名医生(干预组16名,对照组12名)。基线时计算的PIP率在对照组为2.6%(138/5308),干预组为4.11%(768/18668)。在干预期间未观察到PIPs的变化(P = 0.80)。数据质量探针总体显示问题列表和药物列表的使用较少。第2阶段:共有5名医生参与。所有参与者都觉得他们知道这些警报,但对工作流程和呈现方式提出了挑战。

结论

计算出的PIP率明显低于文献中发现的预期率(2.6%和4.0%,而文献中为20%)。数据质量探针突出了与用于PIP报告的EMR区域以及问题和药物列表等决策支持中的数据完整性相关的问题。用户还强调了将STOPP指南更好地与处方工作流程整合的领域。许多STOPP标准可以使用简单逻辑在EMR中实施。然而,EMR中的数据质量仍然是一个挑战,并且是本研究中决策支持有效性的限制步骤。这很重要,因为决策者继续为EMR的实施和采用提供资金,期望使用先进工具(如决策支持)而不持续审查数据质量和进行改进。

试验注册

Clinicaltrials.gov NCT02130895;https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02130895(由WebCite存档于http://www.webcitation.org/6qyFigSYT)。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1450/5491896/04695f64271d/medinform_v5i2e15_fig1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验