• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种基于网络的决策工具,用于改善对患有慢性疾病女性的避孕咨询:一项混合方法实施研究的方案

A Web-Based Decision Tool to Improve Contraceptive Counseling for Women With Chronic Medical Conditions: Protocol For a Mixed Methods Implementation Study.

作者信息

Wu Justine P, Damschroder Laura J, Fetters Michael D, Zikmund-Fisher Brian J, Crabtree Benjamin F, Hudson Shawna V, Ruffin Mack T, Fucinari Juliana, Kang Minji, Taichman L Susan, Creswell John W

机构信息

Department of Family Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States.

VA Center for Clinical Management Research, Ann Arbor, MI, United States.

出版信息

JMIR Res Protoc. 2018 Apr 18;7(4):e107. doi: 10.2196/resprot.9249.

DOI:10.2196/resprot.9249
PMID:29669707
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5932336/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Women with chronic medical conditions, such as diabetes and hypertension, have a higher risk of pregnancy-related complications compared with women without medical conditions and should be offered contraception if desired. Although evidence based guidelines for contraceptive selection in the presence of medical conditions are available via the United States Medical Eligibility Criteria (US MEC), these guidelines are underutilized. Research also supports the use of decision tools to promote shared decision making between patients and providers during contraceptive counseling.

OBJECTIVE

The overall goal of the MiHealth, MiChoice project is to design and implement a theory-driven, Web-based tool that incorporates the US MEC (provider-level intervention) within the vehicle of a contraceptive decision tool for women with chronic medical conditions (patient-level intervention) in community-based primary care settings (practice-level intervention). This will be a 3-phase study that includes a predesign phase, a design phase, and a testing phase in a randomized controlled trial. This study protocol describes phase 1 and aim 1, which is to determine patient-, provider-, and practice-level factors that are relevant to the design and implementation of the contraceptive decision tool.

METHODS

This is a mixed methods implementation study. To customize the delivery of the US MEC in the decision tool, we selected high-priority constructs from the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research and the Theoretical Domains Framework to drive data collection and analysis at the practice and provider level, respectively. A conceptual model that incorporates constructs from the transtheoretical model and the health beliefs model undergirds patient-level data collection and analysis and will inform customization of the decision tool for this population. We will recruit 6 community-based primary care practices and conduct quantitative surveys and semistructured qualitative interviews with women who have chronic medical conditions, their primary care providers (PCPs), and clinic staff, as well as field observations of practice activities. Quantitative survey data will be summarized with simple descriptive statistics and relationships between participant characteristics and contraceptive recommendations (for PCPs), and current contraceptive use (for patients) will be examined using Fisher exact test. We will conduct thematic analysis of qualitative data from interviews and field observations. The integration of data will occur by comparing, contrasting, and synthesizing qualitative and quantitative findings to inform the future development and implementation of the intervention.

RESULTS

We are currently enrolling practices and anticipate study completion in 15 months.

CONCLUSIONS

This protocol describes the first phase of a multiphase mixed methods study to develop and implement a Web-based decision tool that is customized to meet the needs of women with chronic medical conditions in primary care settings. Study findings will promote contraceptive counseling via shared decision making and reflect evidence-based guidelines for contraceptive selection.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03153644; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03153644 (Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/6yUkA5lK8).

摘要

背景

患有糖尿病和高血压等慢性疾病的女性,与无疾病的女性相比,发生妊娠相关并发症的风险更高,若有需求应提供避孕措施。尽管通过美国医学适用标准(US MEC)可获取针对患有疾病时避孕选择的循证指南,但这些指南未得到充分利用。研究还支持使用决策工具,以促进在避孕咨询过程中患者与医疗服务提供者之间的共同决策。

目的

MiHealth、MiChoice项目的总体目标是设计并实施一种基于理论的网络工具,该工具在社区基层医疗环境(实践层面干预)中,将US MEC(医疗服务提供者层面干预)纳入针对患有慢性疾病女性的避孕决策工具(患者层面干预)之中。这将是一项分为三个阶段的研究,包括预设计阶段、设计阶段以及随机对照试验中的测试阶段。本研究方案描述了第一阶段和目标1,即确定与避孕决策工具的设计和实施相关的患者、医疗服务提供者及实践层面的因素。

方法

这是一项混合方法实施研究。为了在决策工具中定制US MEC的提供方式,我们分别从实施研究综合框架和理论领域框架中选取了高优先级的构建要素,以推动实践和医疗服务提供者层面的数据收集与分析。一个整合了跨理论模型和健康信念模型构建要素的概念模型为患者层面的数据收集与分析提供支撑,并将为针对该人群的决策工具定制提供依据。我们将招募6家社区基层医疗实践机构,对患有慢性疾病的女性、她们的初级保健提供者(PCP)、诊所工作人员进行定量调查和半结构化定性访谈,并对实践活动进行实地观察。定量调查数据将用简单描述性统计进行汇总,参与者特征与避孕建议(针对PCP)以及当前避孕措施使用情况(针对患者)之间的关系将使用Fisher精确检验进行分析。我们将对访谈和实地观察的定性数据进行主题分析。数据整合将通过比较、对比和综合定性与定量研究结果来实现,以为干预措施的未来开发和实施提供依据。

结果

我们目前正在招募实践机构,并预计在15个月内完成研究。

结论

本方案描述了一项多阶段混合方法研究的第一阶段,该研究旨在开发并实施一种基于网络的决策工具,该工具经过定制以满足基层医疗环境中患有慢性疾病女性的需求。研究结果将通过共同决策促进避孕咨询,并反映避孕选择的循证指南。

试验注册

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03153644;https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03153644(由WebCite存档于http://www.webcitation.org/6yUkA5lK8)

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f8e9/5932336/af77be5b1717/resprot_v7i4e107_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f8e9/5932336/e8f5b70efb8b/resprot_v7i4e107_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f8e9/5932336/af77be5b1717/resprot_v7i4e107_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f8e9/5932336/e8f5b70efb8b/resprot_v7i4e107_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f8e9/5932336/af77be5b1717/resprot_v7i4e107_fig2.jpg

相似文献

1
A Web-Based Decision Tool to Improve Contraceptive Counseling for Women With Chronic Medical Conditions: Protocol For a Mixed Methods Implementation Study.一种基于网络的决策工具,用于改善对患有慢性疾病女性的避孕咨询:一项混合方法实施研究的方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2018 Apr 18;7(4):e107. doi: 10.2196/resprot.9249.
2
3
A Mobile Health Contraception Decision Support Intervention for Latina Adolescents: Implementation Evaluation for Use in School-Based Health Centers.移动健康避孕决策支持干预措施在拉丁裔青少年中的应用:在学校健康中心的使用实施评估。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019 Mar 14;7(3):e11163. doi: 10.2196/11163.
4
Contraceptive Care for Women With Medical Conditions: A Qualitative Study to Identify Potential Best Practices for Primary Care Physicians.患有疾病女性的避孕护理:一项旨在确定初级保健医生潜在最佳实践的定性研究。
Fam Med. 2019 Jul;51(7):559-566. doi: 10.22454/FamMed.2019.499467.
5
A mixed-methods study of provider perspectives on My Birth Control: a contraceptive decision support tool designed to facilitate shared decision making.一项关于提供者对 My Birth Control(一种旨在促进共同决策的避孕决策支持工具)看法的混合方法研究。
Contraception. 2019 Nov;100(5):420-423. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2019.08.001. Epub 2019 Aug 9.
6
Development and field testing of a decision support tool to facilitate shared decision making in contraceptive counseling.开发并现场测试一款决策支持工具,以促进避孕咨询中的共享决策。
Patient Educ Couns. 2017 Jul;100(7):1374-1381. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2017.02.009. Epub 2017 Feb 10.
7
In-Person Versus eHealth Mindfulness-Based Intervention for Adolescents With Chronic Illness: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial.针对患有慢性病青少年的面对面与基于电子健康的正念干预:一项随机对照试验方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2017 Nov 27;6(11):e241. doi: 10.2196/resprot.7700.
8
Enhancing mHealth Technology in the Patient-Centered Medical Home Environment to Activate Patients With Type 2 Diabetes: A Multisite Feasibility Study Protocol.在以患者为中心的医疗之家环境中增强移动健康技术以激励2型糖尿病患者:一项多中心可行性研究方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2017 Mar 6;6(3):e38. doi: 10.2196/resprot.6993.
9
Implementation of a Web-Based Tool for Shared Decision-making in Lung Cancer Screening: Mixed Methods Quality Improvement Evaluation.基于网络的肺癌筛查共享决策工具的实施:混合方法质量改进评估
JMIR Hum Factors. 2022 Apr 1;9(2):e32399. doi: 10.2196/32399.
10
Assessing the Efficacy of an App-Based Method of Family Planning: The Dot Study Protocol.评估基于应用程序的计划生育方法的效果:Dot研究方案。
JMIR Res Protoc. 2017 Jan 18;6(1):e5. doi: 10.2196/resprot.6886.

引用本文的文献

1
Pharmaceutical Analysis of Inpatient Prescriptions: Systematic Observation of Hospital Pharmacists' Practices in the Early User-Centered Design Phase.住院处方的药物分析:以用户为中心的早期设计阶段医院药剂师实践的系统观察
JMIR Hum Factors. 2025 Apr 25;12:e65959. doi: 10.2196/65959.
2
A Decision Aid for Postpartum Adolescent Family Planning: A Quasi-Experimental Study in Tanzania.《青少年产妇产后计划生育决策辅助工具:坦桑尼亚的一项准实验研究》。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Mar 10;20(6):4904. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20064904.
3
Development and pilot test of a pregnancy decision making tool for women with physical disabilities.

本文引用的文献

1
Postpartum care and contraception provided to women with gestational and preconception diabetes in California's Medicaid program.加利福尼亚州医疗补助计划为患有妊娠期糖尿病和孕前糖尿病的女性提供的产后护理与避孕措施。
Contraception. 2017 Dec;96(6):432-438. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2017.08.006. Epub 2017 Aug 24.
2
A guide to using the Theoretical Domains Framework of behaviour change to investigate implementation problems.运用行为改变理论领域框架调查实施问题指南。
Implement Sci. 2017 Jun 21;12(1):77. doi: 10.1186/s13012-017-0605-9.
3
New clinical performance measures for contraceptive care: their importance to healthcare quality.
为身体残疾女性开发并试行怀孕决策工具。
Health Serv Res. 2023 Feb;58(1):223-233. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.14103. Epub 2022 Nov 30.
4
A Patient Decision Aid (i.ARTs) to Facilitate Women's Choice Between Oral and Long-Acting Injectable Antiretroviral Treatment for HIV: Protocols for its Development and Randomized Controlled Pilot Trial.一种帮助女性在口服和长效注射用抗逆转录病毒疗法之间选择治疗HIV的患者决策辅助工具(i.ARTs):其开发方案及随机对照试验。
JMIR Res Protoc. 2022 Sep 13;11(9):e35646. doi: 10.2196/35646.
5
Postpartum Green Star family planning decision aid for pregnant adolescents in Tanzania: a qualitative feasibility study.坦桑尼亚青少年孕妇产后绿星计划生育决策辅助工具:定性可行性研究。
Reprod Health. 2021 Aug 9;18(1):170. doi: 10.1186/s12978-021-01216-6.
6
A theoretical model of contraceptive decision-making and behaviour in diabetes: A qualitative application of the Health Belief Model.糖尿病避孕决策与行为的理论模型:健康信念模型的定性应用。
Diabet Med. 2021 Jun;38(6):e14434. doi: 10.1111/dme.14434. Epub 2020 Nov 6.
7
Association of Pharmacist Prescription With Dispensed Duration of Hormonal Contraception.药师处方与激素避孕药发放持续时间的关联。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 May 1;3(5):e205252. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.5252.
8
Consensus on priorities in maternal education: results of Delphi and nominal group technique approaches.产妇教育重点的共识:德尔菲法和名义群体技术方法的结果。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019 Jul 24;19(1):264. doi: 10.1186/s12884-019-2382-8.
避孕护理的新临床绩效指标:它们对医疗质量的重要性。
Contraception. 2017 Sep;96(3):149-157. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2017.05.013. Epub 2017 Jun 5.
4
Development and field testing of a decision support tool to facilitate shared decision making in contraceptive counseling.开发并现场测试一款决策支持工具,以促进避孕咨询中的共享决策。
Patient Educ Couns. 2017 Jul;100(7):1374-1381. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2017.02.009. Epub 2017 Feb 10.
5
Eugenics, sterilization, and historical memory in the United States.美国的优生学、绝育与历史记忆
Hist Cienc Saude Manguinhos. 2016 Dec;23Suppl 1(Suppl 1):195-212. doi: 10.1590/S0104-59702016000500011.
6
Shared decision making in contraceptive counseling.避孕咨询中的共同决策
Contraception. 2017 May;95(5):452-455. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2016.12.010. Epub 2017 Jan 6.
7
Patient perceptions of a decision support tool to assist with young women's contraceptive choice.患者对一种辅助年轻女性进行避孕选择的决策支持工具的看法。
Patient Educ Couns. 2017 Feb;100(2):343-348. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2016.08.022. Epub 2016 Aug 24.
8
Shared Decision Aids: Increasing Patient Acceptance of Long-Acting Reversible Contraception.
Healthcare (Basel). 2015 Apr 10;3(2):205-18. doi: 10.3390/healthcare3020205.
9
Are the Contraceptive Recommendations of Family Medicine Educators Evidence-Based? A CERA Survey.家庭医学教育工作者的避孕建议是否基于证据?一项CERA调查。
Fam Med. 2016 May;48(5):345-52.
10
Design Features of Explicit Values Clarification Methods: A Systematic Review.明确价值观澄清方法的设计特点:一项系统综述。
Med Decis Making. 2016 May;36(4):453-71. doi: 10.1177/0272989X15626397. Epub 2016 Jan 29.