Department of Health Psychology, Thompson Center for Autism and Neurodevelopmental Disorders, University of Missouri, 205 Portland Street, Columbia, MO, 65211, USA.
Curry School of Education, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA.
J Autism Dev Disord. 2017 Sep;47(9):2783-2794. doi: 10.1007/s10803-017-3200-7.
The transition from DSM-IV to DSM-5 criteria for autism spectrum disorder (ASD) sparked considerable concern about the potential implications of these changes. This study was designed to address limitations of prior studies by prospectively examining the concordance of DSM-IV and final DSM-5 criteria on a consecutive sample of 439 children referred for autism diagnostic evaluations. Concordance and discordance were assessed using a consistent diagnostic battery. DSM-5 criteria demonstrated excellent overall specificity and good sensitivity relative to DSM-IV criteria. Sensitivity and specificity were strongest for children meeting DSM-IV criteria for autistic disorder, but poor for those meeting criteria for Asperger's disorder and pervasive developmental disorder. Higher IQ, older age, female sex, and less pronounced ASD symptoms were associated with greater discordance.
从 DSM-IV 到 DSM-5 自闭症谱系障碍 (ASD) 标准的转变引起了人们对这些变化潜在影响的极大关注。这项研究旨在通过前瞻性地检查连续 439 名接受自闭症诊断评估的儿童的 DSM-IV 和最终 DSM-5 标准的一致性,来解决先前研究的局限性。使用一致的诊断工具来评估一致性和不一致性。与 DSM-IV 标准相比,DSM-5 标准具有极好的总体特异性和良好的敏感性。对于符合 DSM-IV 自闭症障碍标准的儿童,敏感性和特异性最强,但对于符合阿斯伯格障碍和广泛性发育障碍标准的儿童则较差。较高的智商、较大的年龄、女性性别和不太明显的 ASD 症状与更大的不一致性相关。