Department of Communication Studies, Mike Curb College of Arts, Media, and Communication, California State University Northridge, Northridge, California, USA.
Jeb E Brooks School of Public Policy, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, USA.
J Health Commun. 2022 Aug 3;27(8):574-584. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2022.2138640. Epub 2022 Nov 2.
Warnings specifically focused on harm to younger users have been understudied in vaping warning research, even while vaping products may appeal specifically to a younger population through implicit advertising strategies. This study examined how youth and young adult-focused e-cigarette health warning messages and implicit advertising strategies influence affective responses, risk perceptions, cognitive elaboration about e-cigarette harms, and willingness to vape in the future. We recruited young adults (who, at the time, were not smoking combustible cigarettes) aged 18-25 to participate in an online survey experiment with a 3 (warning label type: current FDA/youth and young adult risk-focused/none) × 3 (advertising health message strategy: explicit/implicit/none) + 3 (non-vaping products control) design. The results show a main effect for warning such that both FDA and targeted warnings increased negative affect and decreased positive affect compared to no warning. Moreover, the youth and young adult-focused warning boosted youth-specific harm beliefs and cognitive elaboration relative to control and the FDA warning, which did not differ from one another. Implicit health messages produced greater positive affect relative to explicit messages and no message, but the ad strategy manipulations did not influence other outcomes. While the population studied here with a single exposure reported no effects of either manipulation on willingness to vape, previous research has associated similar emotions and cognitions with lowered intentions to vape. Regulatory bodies should consider further exploration of vaping warnings that emphasize youth and young adult-specific harms to educate young people about relevant risks.
警示信息特别关注对年轻用户的危害,这在电子烟警示研究中被忽视了,尽管电子烟产品可能通过隐性广告策略特别吸引年轻群体。本研究考察了针对青年和年轻成年人的电子烟健康警示信息和隐性广告策略如何影响情感反应、风险认知、对电子烟危害的认知思考以及未来使用电子烟的意愿。我们招募了年龄在 18-25 岁之间、目前不吸可燃香烟的年轻人参与一项在线调查实验,采用 3(警示标签类型:当前 FDA/针对青年和年轻成年人的风险警示/无)×3(广告健康信息策略:显性/隐性/无)+3(非电子烟产品对照)设计。结果表明,警示信息存在主要影响,即与无警示相比,FDA 警示和有针对性的警示都增加了负面情绪,减少了正面情绪。此外,针对青年和年轻成年人的警示信息相对于对照和 FDA 警示增加了青年特有的危害信念和认知思考,而 FDA 警示与对照之间没有差异。隐性健康信息产生的正面情绪比显性信息和无信息更多,但广告策略的操纵并没有影响其他结果。虽然研究中接受单一干预的人群报告称这两种干预都不会影响他们使用电子烟的意愿,但之前的研究表明,类似的情绪和认知与降低使用电子烟的意愿有关。监管机构应考虑进一步探索强调青年和年轻成年人特定危害的电子烟警示信息,以教育年轻人了解相关风险。