J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2017 Jul;47(7):472-480. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2017.7081. Epub 2017 Jun 16.
Study Design Systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Background General exercise, defined as purposeful physical activity involving repetitive exercises and incorporating multiple muscle groups, is frequently used in the management of whiplash-associated disorders (WADs). Evidence supporting its efficacy is not well established. Objectives To determine whether general exercise is effective in reducing pain and disability in people with WAD. Methods Studies published in English in peer-reviewed journals between January 1990 and May 2015 were eligible if they evaluated a general exercise intervention compared with a different intervention or control. Studies were required to evaluate pain and disability at medium-term (6-14 weeks) and long-term (52 weeks) follow-ups. The mean ± SD and sample size were recorded for follow-up scores and for change scores from baseline to follow-up. Results Of the 3 high-quality studies that were eligible for inclusion, none investigated general exercise alone. There were no clinically meaningful differences between comprehensive exercise programs, which included general exercise, and minimal intervention controls in the medium and long term. No studies directly compared general exercise with a no-treatment control. All included studies used different control interventions, preventing meta-analysis. Conclusion A lack of significant long-term improvements from general exercise interventions in individuals with WAD was identified. This finding differs from the positive benefits of general exercise for other musculoskeletal conditions. This may, in part, relate to the complexity of whiplash conditions. This may also reflect the challenge of exercise prescription in this population, where the need for sufficient intensity is balanced against the impact that exercise has on pain. Level of Evidence Therapy, level 1a. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2017;47(7):472-480. Epub 16 Jun 2017. doi:10.2519/jospt.2017.7081.
系统评价随机对照试验。
一般运动是指有目的的体力活动,包括重复运动和多肌群参与,常用于治疗颈背部扭伤相关疾病(WAD)。其疗效的证据尚未得到很好的确定。
确定一般运动是否能有效减轻 WAD 患者的疼痛和残疾。
如果评估的一般运动干预与不同的干预或对照相比,发表在同行评审期刊上的英文文献,且发表时间在 1990 年 1 月至 2015 年 5 月之间,均符合入选条件。研究必须在中期(6-14 周)和长期(52 周)随访中评估疼痛和残疾。记录随访评分的平均值±标准差和样本量,以及从基线到随访的变化评分。
在符合纳入条件的 3 项高质量研究中,没有一项研究单独评估一般运动。在中期和长期,综合运动项目(包括一般运动)与最低干预对照组之间没有临床意义上的差异。没有研究直接比较一般运动与无治疗对照组。所有纳入的研究均使用不同的对照干预措施,因此无法进行荟萃分析。
在 WAD 患者中,一般运动干预没有显著的长期改善。这一发现与一般运动对其他肌肉骨骼疾病的积极益处不同。这可能部分与颈部扭伤的复杂性有关。这也可能反映了在这一人群中进行运动处方的挑战,其中需要足够的强度,同时还要考虑运动对疼痛的影响。
治疗,1a 级。J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2017;47(7):472-480. Epub 16 Jun 2017. doi:10.2519/jospt.2017.7081.