• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

注意!是否可以通过训练来选择低价值食物而不是高价值食物?

Attention! Can choices for low value food over high value food be trained?

机构信息

Behavioural Science Institute, Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

Behavioural Science Institute, Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Appetite. 2018 May 1;124:124-132. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2017.06.010. Epub 2017 Jun 13.

DOI:10.1016/j.appet.2017.06.010
PMID:28627402
Abstract

People choose high value food items over low value food items, because food choices are guided by the comparison of values placed upon choice alternatives. This value comparison process is also influenced by the amount of attention people allocate to different items. Recent research shows that choices for food items can be increased by training attention toward these items, with a paradigm named cued-approach training (CAT). However, previous work till now has only examined the influence of CAT on choices between two equally valued items. It has remained unclear whether CAT can increase choices for low value items when people choose between a low and high value food item. To address this question in the current study participants were cued to make rapid responses in CAT to certain low and high value items. Next, they made binary choices between low and high value items, where we systematically varied whether the low and high value items were cued or uncued. In two experiments, we found that participants overall preferred high over low value food items for real consumption. More important, their choices for low value items increased when only the low value item had been cued in CAT compared to when both low and high value items had not been cued. Exploratory analyses revealed that this effect was more pronounced for participants with a relatively small value difference between low and high value items. The present research thus suggests that CAT may be used to boost the choice and consumption of low value items via enhanced attention toward these items, as long as the value difference is not too large. Implications for facilitating choices for healthy food are discussed.

摘要

人们会选择高价值的食品而不是低价值的食品,因为食品选择受到对选择替代物的价值比较的指导。这种价值比较过程也受到人们对不同物品分配注意力的数量的影响。最近的研究表明,通过训练对这些物品的注意力,可以增加对食品的选择,这种训练方法名为提示接近训练(CAT)。然而,到目前为止,之前的工作只检查了 CAT 对两个具有同等价值的物品之间的选择的影响。当人们在低价值和高价值的食品之间进行选择时,CAT 是否可以增加对低价值物品的选择,这一点仍不清楚。为了解决当前研究中的这个问题,参与者被提示在 CAT 中对某些低价值和高价值的物品进行快速反应。接下来,他们在低价值和高价值的物品之间进行二选一的选择,在这个过程中,我们系统地改变了低价值和高价值的物品是否被提示。在两项实验中,我们发现参与者总体上更喜欢高价值的食品,而不是低价值的食品,用于实际消费。更重要的是,与低价值和高价值的物品都没有被提示相比,当只有低价值的物品在 CAT 中被提示时,他们对低价值物品的选择增加了。探索性分析表明,对于低价值和高价值物品之间的价值差异相对较小的参与者,这种效果更为明显。因此,本研究表明,只要价值差异不是太大,CAT 可以通过增强对这些物品的注意力,来提高对低价值物品的选择和消费。讨论了促进健康食品选择的意义。

相似文献

1
Attention! Can choices for low value food over high value food be trained?注意!是否可以通过训练来选择低价值食物而不是高价值食物?
Appetite. 2018 May 1;124:124-132. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2017.06.010. Epub 2017 Jun 13.
2
Training impulsive choices for healthy and sustainable food.培养对健康可持续食品的冲动选择。
J Exp Psychol Appl. 2017 Jun;23(2):204-215. doi: 10.1037/xap0000112. Epub 2017 Feb 2.
3
Mechanisms of Choice Behavior Shift Using Cue-approach Training.使用线索趋近训练的选择行为转变机制。
Front Psychol. 2016 Mar 23;7:421. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00421. eCollection 2016.
4
Do hedonic- versus nutrition-based attitudes toward food predict food choices? a cross-sectional study of 6- to 11-year-olds.基于享乐主义与营养的食物态度能否预测食物选择?一项针对6至11岁儿童的横断面研究。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2017 Nov 25;14(1):162. doi: 10.1186/s12966-017-0618-4.
5
When mere action versus inaction leads to robust preference change.当仅仅是行动与不作为就导致了强烈的偏好改变时。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2019 Oct;117(4):721-740. doi: 10.1037/pspa0000158. Epub 2019 Mar 28.
6
Healthy decisions in the cued-attribute food choice paradigm have high test-retest reliability.在提示属性食物选择范式中,健康的决策具有较高的测试-重测信度。
Sci Rep. 2021 Jun 18;11(1):12844. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-91933-6.
7
Attention to food and beverage advertisements as measured by eye-tracking technology and the food preferences and choices of youth.通过眼动追踪技术测量的对食品和饮料广告的关注与青少年的食物偏好和选择。
J Acad Nutr Diet. 2014 Apr;114(4):578-82. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2013.09.030. Epub 2013 Dec 12.
8
Goal-directed visual attention drives health goal priming: An eye-tracking experiment.目标导向的视觉注意力驱动健康目标启动:一项眼动追踪实验。
Health Psychol. 2017 Jan;36(1):82-90. doi: 10.1037/hea0000410. Epub 2016 Sep 15.
9
The role of value in the attentional boost effect.价值在注意增强效应中的作用。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2019 Mar;72(3):523-542. doi: 10.1177/1747021818760791. Epub 2018 Mar 8.
10
Endogenous formation of preferences: Choices systematically change willingness-to-pay for goods.偏好的内生形成:选择会系统性地改变对商品的支付意愿。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2017 Dec;43(12):1872-1882. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000415. Epub 2017 May 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Attentional capture by signals of reward persists following outcome devaluation.注意捕获由奖励信号在结果贬值后仍然存在。
Learn Mem. 2022 Jul 12;29(7):181-191. doi: 10.1101/lm.053569.122. Print 2022 Jul.
2
Memory for individual items is related to nonreinforced preference change.个体项目的记忆与非强化偏好改变有关。
Learn Mem. 2021 Sep 15;28(10):348-360. doi: 10.1101/lm.053411.121. Print 2021 Oct.
3
Effects of go/no-go training on food-related action tendencies, liking and choice.停止信号训练对与食物相关的行动倾向、喜好和选择的影响。
R Soc Open Sci. 2021 Aug 25;8(8):210666. doi: 10.1098/rsos.210666. eCollection 2021 Aug.
4
Modifying food items valuation and weight with gamified executive control training.通过游戏化的执行控制训练修改食品估值和重量
R Soc Open Sci. 2021 May 26;8(5):191288. doi: 10.1098/rsos.191288.
5
Edible Flowers, Old Tradition or New Gastronomic Trend: A First Look at Consumption in Portugal versus Costa Rica.可食用花卉:古老传统还是新美食潮流?葡萄牙与哥斯达黎加消费情况初探
Foods. 2020 Jul 23;9(8):977. doi: 10.3390/foods9080977.
6
The affective priming paradigm as an indirect measure of food attitudes and related choice behaviour.情感启动范式作为食物态度及相关选择行为的间接测量方法。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2020 Dec;27(6):1397-1415. doi: 10.3758/s13423-020-01764-1.
7
Enhanced striatal and prefrontal activity is associated with individual differences in nonreinforced preference change for faces.增强的纹状体和前额叶活动与非强化的面孔偏好变化的个体差异相关。
Hum Brain Mapp. 2020 Mar;41(4):1043-1060. doi: 10.1002/hbm.24859. Epub 2019 Nov 15.
8
Enhanced Bottom-Up and Reduced Top-Down fMRI Activity Is Related to Long-Lasting Nonreinforced Behavioral Change.增强的自下而上和减少的自上而下的 fMRI 活动与长期无强化的行为改变有关。
Cereb Cortex. 2020 Mar 14;30(3):858-874. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhz132.
9
Is ventromedial prefrontal cortex critical for behavior change without external reinforcement?腹内侧前额叶皮质对于没有外部强化的行为改变是否至关重要?
Neuropsychologia. 2019 Feb 18;124:208-215. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2018.12.008. Epub 2018 Dec 11.
10
Spacing of cue-approach training leads to better maintenance of behavioral change.线索-接近训练的间隔能更好地维持行为改变。
PLoS One. 2018 Jul 30;13(7):e0201580. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0201580. eCollection 2018.