• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用线索趋近训练的选择行为转变机制。

Mechanisms of Choice Behavior Shift Using Cue-approach Training.

作者信息

Bakkour Akram, Leuker Christina, Hover Ashleigh M, Giles Nathan, Poldrack Russell A, Schonberg Tom

机构信息

Imaging Research Center, The University of Texas at AustinAustin, TX, USA; Department of Psychology, Columbia University in the City of New YorkNew York, NY, USA.

Imaging Research Center, The University of Texas at AustinAustin, TX, USA; Center for Adaptive Rationality, Max Planck Institute for Human DevelopmentBerlin, Germany.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2016 Mar 23;7:421. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00421. eCollection 2016.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00421
PMID:27047435
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4804288/
Abstract

Cue-approach training has been shown to effectively shift choices for snack food items by associating a cued button-press motor response to particular food items. Furthermore, attention was biased toward previously cued items, even when the cued item is not chosen for real consumption during a choice phase. However, the exact mechanism by which preferences shift during cue-approach training is not entirely clear. In three experiments, we shed light on the possible underlying mechanisms at play during this novel paradigm: (1) Uncued, wholly predictable motor responses paired with particular food items were not sufficient to elicit a preference shift; (2) Cueing motor responses early - concurrently with food item onset - and thus eliminating the need for heightened top-down attention to the food stimulus in preparation for a motor response also eliminated the shift in food preferences. This finding reinforces our hypothesis that heightened attention at behaviorally relevant points in time is key to changing choice behavior in the cue-approach task; (3) Crucially, indicating choice using eye movements rather than manual button presses preserves the effect, thus demonstrating that the shift in preferences is not governed by a learned motor response but more likely via modulation of subjective value in higher associative regions, consistent with previous neuroimaging results. Cue-approach training drives attention at behaviorally relevant points in time to modulate the subjective value of individual items, providing a mechanism for behavior change that does not rely on external reinforcement and that holds great promise for developing real world behavioral interventions.

摘要

线索接近训练已被证明可以通过将线索提示的按键动作反应与特定食品相关联,有效地改变对零食的选择。此外,注意力会偏向于之前被提示的物品,即使在选择阶段被提示的物品并未被实际选择食用。然而,在线索接近训练过程中偏好发生改变的确切机制尚不完全清楚。在三项实验中,我们揭示了在这种新范式中可能起作用的潜在机制:(1)与特定食品配对的未提示、完全可预测的动作反应不足以引发偏好改变;(2)早期提示动作反应——与食品出现同时进行——从而消除了为准备动作反应而对食品刺激进行增强的自上而下注意力的需求,这也消除了食品偏好的改变。这一发现强化了我们的假设,即在与行为相关的时间点上增强注意力是在线索接近任务中改变选择行为的关键;(3)至关重要的是,使用眼球运动而非手动按键来表明选择能保留这种效果,从而表明偏好的改变并非由习得的动作反应所控制,而更有可能是通过更高层次联想区域中主观价值的调节,这与之前的神经成像结果一致。线索接近训练在与行为相关的时间点上驱动注意力,以调节单个物品的主观价值,提供了一种不依赖外部强化的行为改变机制,并且对于开发现实世界的行为干预措施具有很大的前景。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9bf2/4804288/c8e72f1aaff3/fpsyg-07-00421-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9bf2/4804288/c8e72f1aaff3/fpsyg-07-00421-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9bf2/4804288/c8e72f1aaff3/fpsyg-07-00421-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Mechanisms of Choice Behavior Shift Using Cue-approach Training.使用线索趋近训练的选择行为转变机制。
Front Psychol. 2016 Mar 23;7:421. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00421. eCollection 2016.
2
Attention! Can choices for low value food over high value food be trained?注意!是否可以通过训练来选择低价值食物而不是高价值食物?
Appetite. 2018 May 1;124:124-132. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2017.06.010. Epub 2017 Jun 13.
3
Neural mechanisms of cue-approach training.线索趋近训练的神经机制。
Neuroimage. 2017 May 1;151:92-104. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.09.059. Epub 2016 Sep 24.
4
Changing value through cued approach: an automatic mechanism of behavior change.通过提示引导改变价值:行为改变的自动机制。
Nat Neurosci. 2014 Apr;17(4):625-30. doi: 10.1038/nn.3673. Epub 2014 Mar 9.
5
Memory for individual items is related to nonreinforced preference change.个体项目的记忆与非强化偏好改变有关。
Learn Mem. 2021 Sep 15;28(10):348-360. doi: 10.1101/lm.053411.121. Print 2021 Oct.
6
Is ventromedial prefrontal cortex critical for behavior change without external reinforcement?腹内侧前额叶皮质对于没有外部强化的行为改变是否至关重要?
Neuropsychologia. 2019 Feb 18;124:208-215. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2018.12.008. Epub 2018 Dec 11.
7
Training impulsive choices for healthy and sustainable food.培养对健康可持续食品的冲动选择。
J Exp Psychol Appl. 2017 Jun;23(2):204-215. doi: 10.1037/xap0000112. Epub 2017 Feb 2.
8
Revising the link between microsaccades and the spatial cueing of voluntary attention.修正微扫视与自愿注意的空间线索之间的联系。
Vision Res. 2017 Apr;133:47-60. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2017.01.001. Epub 2017 Feb 17.
9
The role of attention in explaining the no-go devaluation effect: Effects on appetitive food items.注意在解释非-go 减值效应中的作用:对食欲性食物的影响。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2019 Aug;45(8):1119-1133. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000659. Epub 2019 May 30.
10
Probing the time course of facilitation and inhibition in gaze cueing of attention in an upper-limb reaching task.探究上肢伸展任务中注视线索化注意的促进和抑制的时间进程。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2019 Oct;81(7):2410-2423. doi: 10.3758/s13414-019-01821-5.

引用本文的文献

1
Memory for individual items is related to nonreinforced preference change.个体项目的记忆与非强化偏好改变有关。
Learn Mem. 2021 Sep 15;28(10):348-360. doi: 10.1101/lm.053411.121. Print 2021 Oct.
2
Modifying food items valuation and weight with gamified executive control training.通过游戏化的执行控制训练修改食品估值和重量
R Soc Open Sci. 2021 May 26;8(5):191288. doi: 10.1098/rsos.191288.
3
Does alcohol cue inhibitory control training survive a context shift?酒精线索抑制控制训练能否在情境转换中幸存下来?

本文引用的文献

1
Stimulus devaluation induced by action stopping is greater for explicit value representations.由动作停止引发的刺激贬值对于显性价值表征而言更大。
Front Psychol. 2015 Oct 28;6:1640. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01640. eCollection 2015.
2
Should I stop or should I go? The role of associations and expectancies.我该停下还是继续?关联与期望的作用。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2016 Jan;42(1):115-37. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000116. Epub 2015 Aug 31.
3
How does the hippocampus shape decisions?海马体如何塑造决策?
Psychol Addict Behav. 2020 Nov;34(7):783-792. doi: 10.1037/adb0000580. Epub 2020 Apr 13.
4
Enhanced striatal and prefrontal activity is associated with individual differences in nonreinforced preference change for faces.增强的纹状体和前额叶活动与非强化的面孔偏好变化的个体差异相关。
Hum Brain Mapp. 2020 Mar;41(4):1043-1060. doi: 10.1002/hbm.24859. Epub 2019 Nov 15.
5
Enhanced Bottom-Up and Reduced Top-Down fMRI Activity Is Related to Long-Lasting Nonreinforced Behavioral Change.增强的自下而上和减少的自上而下的 fMRI 活动与长期无强化的行为改变有关。
Cereb Cortex. 2020 Mar 14;30(3):858-874. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhz132.
6
Is ventromedial prefrontal cortex critical for behavior change without external reinforcement?腹内侧前额叶皮质对于没有外部强化的行为改变是否至关重要?
Neuropsychologia. 2019 Feb 18;124:208-215. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2018.12.008. Epub 2018 Dec 11.
7
Spacing of cue-approach training leads to better maintenance of behavioral change.线索-接近训练的间隔能更好地维持行为改变。
PLoS One. 2018 Jul 30;13(7):e0201580. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0201580. eCollection 2018.
8
The Cue-Approach Task as a General Mechanism for Long-Term Non-Reinforced Behavioral Change.线索接近任务作为长期非强化行为改变的一般机制。
Sci Rep. 2018 Feb 26;8(1):3614. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-21774-3.
9
What Is Trained During Food Go/No-Go Training? A Review Focusing on Mechanisms and a Research Agenda.在食物“去/不去”训练中训练的是什么?一项聚焦机制和研究议程的综述。
Curr Addict Rep. 2017;4(1):35-41. doi: 10.1007/s40429-017-0131-5. Epub 2017 Feb 22.
10
Psychological and neural contributions to appetite self-regulation.心理和神经因素对食欲自我调节的作用。
Obesity (Silver Spring). 2017 Mar;25 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S17-S25. doi: 10.1002/oby.21789.
Neurobiol Learn Mem. 2015 Nov;125:93-7. doi: 10.1016/j.nlm.2015.08.005. Epub 2015 Aug 19.
4
Chocolate equals stop. Chocolate-specific inhibition training reduces chocolate intake and go associations with chocolate.巧克力等于停。巧克力特异性抑制训练可减少巧克力摄入量和与巧克力相关的联想。
Appetite. 2015 Apr;87:318-23. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2015.01.005. Epub 2015 Jan 13.
5
Stopping to food can reduce intake. Effects of stimulus-specificity and individual differences in dietary restraint.停止进食会减少摄入量。刺激特异性和饮食节制中个体差异的影响。
Appetite. 2015 Feb;85:91-103. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2014.11.006. Epub 2014 Nov 11.
6
Attention, reward, and information seeking.注意力、奖励与信息寻求。
J Neurosci. 2014 Nov 12;34(46):15497-504. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3270-14.2014.
7
Stimulus devaluation induced by stopping action.停止动作引发的刺激贬值。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2014 Dec;143(6):2316-29. doi: 10.1037/xge0000022. Epub 2014 Oct 13.
8
Changing value through cued approach: an automatic mechanism of behavior change.通过提示引导改变价值:行为改变的自动机制。
Nat Neurosci. 2014 Apr;17(4):625-30. doi: 10.1038/nn.3673. Epub 2014 Mar 9.
9
On the ability to inhibit thought and action: general and special theories of an act of control.关于抑制思维和行动的能力:控制行为的一般和特殊理论。
Psychol Rev. 2014 Jan;121(1):66-95. doi: 10.1037/a0035230.
10
Stop signals decrease choices for palatable foods through decreased food evaluation.停止信号通过降低食物评价来减少美味食物的选择。
Front Psychol. 2013 Nov 26;4:875. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00875. eCollection 2013.