[Relationship between glycemic control and visceral adiposity index among the patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus].

OBJECTIVE

To explore the relationship between glycemic control and visceral adiposity index (VAI) among type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients.

METHODS

A community-based epidemiological field study for patients with T2DM aged ≥ 40 years was conducted in China.Every participant underwent physical examinations, biochemical tests of fasting glucose, glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c), total cholesterol (TC), triglyceride (TG), high density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and so on, and a questionnaire, including anthropometric characteristics, lifestyle, disease history, family history, and medication use. Those participants with HbA1c ≥7.0% were classified as the poorly controlled in our analysis of relationship between glycemic control and VAI. Anthropometric characteristics, lifestyle, and biochemical indexes of the participants were compared among the groups of different VAI levels. Logistic models were applied in multiple analysis adjusting for possible confounders.

RESULTS

A total of 1 607 patients with T2DM were recruited in our analysis with a mean age of (59.4±8.1) years and an average T2DM duration of (7.0±6.4) years. Among them, 78.3% were on hypoglycemic therapy. The cutoff points of quartiles of VAI were calculated for the males and females, respectively. According to the ascending order of the quartiles of VAI, the participants were divided into four groups, i.e. Q1, Q2, Q3, and Q4. The poor glycemic control rate for these groups were 60.6%, 65.7%, 70.1%, and 71.0%, respectively (Trend χ=12.20, P<0.001). After adjustment for age, gender, systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), LDL-C, smoking, cardio-cerebral vascular disease (CVD) history, hypoglycemic therapy, T2DM duration, and family history of diabetes, the Logistic regression models showed that the glycemic control rate was significantly associated with VAI levels among the patients with T2DM. Compared with the participants in group Q1, the ORs of poor glycemic control for those in groups Q2, Q3, and Q4 were 1.239 (95%CI 0.918 to 1.672), 1.513 (95%CI 1.117 to 2.050), and 1.535 (95%CI 1.128 to 2.088), respectively (trend P=0.003). With each quartile increase in VAI, the OR of poor glycemic control was 1.162 (95%CI 1.054 to 1.282).

CONCLUSION

The glycemic control among the patients with T2DM is significantly associated with VAI. High level of VAI is an indicator of poor glycemic control.