Laboratory of Geo-Information Science and Remote Sensing, Wageningen University and Research, P.O. Box 47, 6700 AA Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Farming Systems Ecology Group, Wageningen University and Research, P.O. Box 430, 6700 AK Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Sensors (Basel). 2017 Jun 18;17(6):1428. doi: 10.3390/s17061428.
Vegetation properties can be estimated using optical sensors, acquiring data on board of different platforms. For instance, ground-based and Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV)-borne spectrometers can measure reflectance in narrow spectral bands, while different modelling approaches, like regressions fitted to vegetation indices, can relate spectra with crop traits. Although monitoring frameworks using multiple sensors can be more flexible, they may result in higher inaccuracy due to differences related to the sensors characteristics, which can affect information sampling. Also organic production systems can benefit from continuous monitoring focusing on crop management and stress detection, but few studies have evaluated applications with this objective. In this study, ground-based and UAV spectrometers were compared in the context of organic potato cultivation. Relatively accurate estimates were obtained for leaf chlorophyll (RMSE = 6.07 µg·cm), leaf area index (RMSE = 0.67 m²·m), canopy chlorophyll (RMSE = 0.24 g·m) and ground cover (RMSE = 5.5%) using five UAV-based data acquisitions, from 43 to 99 days after planting. These retrievals are slightly better than those derived from ground-based measurements (RMSE = 7.25 µg·cm, 0.85 m²·m, 0.28 g·m and 6.8%, respectively), for the same period. Excluding observations corresponding to the first acquisition increased retrieval accuracy and made outputs more comparable between sensors, due to relatively low vegetation cover on this date. Intercomparison of vegetation indices indicated that indices based on the contrast between spectral bands in the visible and near-infrared, like OSAVI, MCARI2 and CI provided, at certain extent, robust outputs that could be transferred between sensors. Information sampling at plot level by both sensing solutions resulted in comparable discriminative potential concerning advanced stages of late blight incidence. These results indicate that optical sensors, and their integration, have great potential for monitoring this specific organic cropping system.
植被特性可以使用光学传感器进行估算,从不同平台获取数据。例如,地面和无人机载光谱仪可以测量窄光谱波段的反射率,而不同的建模方法,如拟合植被指数的回归,可以将光谱与作物特征相关联。虽然使用多个传感器的监测框架可以更加灵活,但由于传感器特性差异导致的精度降低,可能会影响信息采集。此外,有机生产系统可以从侧重于作物管理和胁迫检测的连续监测中受益,但很少有研究评估具有此目标的应用。在本研究中,在有机土豆种植的背景下,对地面和无人机载光谱仪进行了比较。在种植后 43 至 99 天内,通过五次基于无人机的数据采集,获得了相对准确的叶片叶绿素估算值(RMSE = 6.07 µg·cm)、叶面积指数(RMSE = 0.67 m²·m)、冠层叶绿素(RMSE = 0.24 g·m)和地面覆盖率(RMSE = 5.5%)。这些检索结果略优于同期地面测量得出的结果(RMSE = 7.25 µg·cm、0.85 m²·m、0.28 g·m 和 6.8%)。由于在这一天植被覆盖率相对较低,排除第一次采集的观测结果提高了检索精度,并使传感器之间的输出更加可比。植被指数的比较表明,基于可见和近红外波段之间对比度的指数,如 OSAVI、MCARI2 和 CI,在一定程度上提供了稳健的输出,可以在传感器之间转换。两种传感解决方案在地块水平上的信息采集在晚疫病发病后期的高级阶段具有相当的鉴别潜力。这些结果表明,光学传感器及其集成具有监测这种特定有机种植系统的巨大潜力。