Abdelbaki Asmaa, Schlerf Martin, Retzlaff Rebecca, Machwitz Miriam, Verrelst Jochem, Udelhoven Thomas
Environmental Remote Sensing and Geoinformatics Department, Trier University, 54286 Trier, Germany.
Soils and Water Science Department, Faculty of Agriculture, Fayoum University, Fayoum 63514, Egypt.
Remote Sens (Basel). 2021 Apr 30;13(9):1748. doi: 10.3390/rs13091748.
Hyperspectral cameras onboard unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) have recently emerged for monitoring crop traits at the sub-field scale. Different physical, statistical, and hybrid methods for crop trait retrieval have been developed. However, spectra collected from UAVs can be confounded by various issues, including illumination variation throughout the crop growing season, the effect of which on the retrieval performance is not well understood at present. In this study, four retrieval methods are compared, in terms of retrieving the leaf area index (LAI), fractional vegetation cover (fCover), and canopy chlorophyll content (CCC) of potato plants over an agricultural field for six dates during the growing season. We analyzed: (1) The standard look-up table method (LUTstd), (2) an improved (regularized) LUT method that involves variable correlation (LUTreg), (3) hybrid methods, and (4) random forest regression without (RF) and with (RFexp) the exposure time as an additional explanatory variable. The Soil-Leaf-Canopy (SLC) model was used in association with the LUT-based inversion and hybrid methods, while the statistical modelling methods (RF and RFexp) relied entirely on in situ data. The results revealed that RFexp was the best-performing method, yielding the highest accuracies, in terms of the normalized root mean square error (NRMSE), for LAI (5.36%), fCover (5.87%), and CCC (15.01%). RFexp was able to reduce the effects of illumination variability and cloud shadows. LUTreg outperformed the other two retrieval methods (hybrid methods and LUTstd), with an NRMSE of 9.18% for LAI, 10.46% for fCover, and 12.16% for CCC. Conversely, LUTreg led to lower accuracies than those derived from RF for LAI (5.51%) and for fCover (6.23%), but not for CCC (16.21%). Therefore, the machine learning approaches-in particular, RF-appear to be the most promising retrieval methods for application to UAV-based hyperspectral data.
搭载在无人机(UAV)上的高光谱相机最近已出现,用于在亚田间尺度监测作物性状。已经开发出了不同的用于作物性状反演的物理、统计和混合方法。然而,从无人机收集的光谱可能会受到各种问题的干扰,包括作物生长季节的光照变化,目前其对反演性能的影响尚不清楚。在本研究中,比较了四种反演方法,用于反演生长季节六个日期内农田中马铃薯植株的叶面积指数(LAI)、植被覆盖度(fCover)和冠层叶绿素含量(CCC)。我们分析了:(1)标准查找表法(LUTstd),(2)一种改进的(正则化的)涉及可变相关性的LUT方法(LUTreg),(3)混合方法,以及(4)不使用(RF)和使用(RFexp)曝光时间作为额外解释变量的随机森林回归。土壤-叶片-冠层(SLC)模型与基于LUT的反演和混合方法联合使用,而统计建模方法(RF和RFexp)完全依赖于原位数据。结果表明,就归一化均方根误差(NRMSE)而言,RFexp是性能最佳的方法,在LAI(5.36%)、fCover(5.87%)和CCC(15.01%)方面具有最高的精度。RFexp能够减少光照变异性和云影的影响。LUTreg的表现优于其他两种反演方法(混合方法和LUTstd),LAI的NRMSE为9.18%,fCover为10.46%,CCC为12.16%。相反,对于LAI(5.51%)和fCover(6.23%),LUTreg的精度低于RF,但对于CCC(16.21%)并非如此。因此,机器学习方法——尤其是RF——似乎是应用于基于无人机的高光谱数据的最有前景的反演方法。