Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Canada.
Mount Vernon Hospital, United Kingdom.
Radiother Oncol. 2017 Jul;124(1):38-44. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2017.06.002. Epub 2017 Jun 16.
Single fraction radiation treatment (SFRT) is recommended for its equivalence to multiple-fraction (MF) RT in the palliation of uncomplicated bone metastases (BM). However, adoption of SFRT has been slow.
Literature searches for studies published following 2014 were conducted using online repositories of gray literature, Ovid MEDLINE, Embase and Embase Classic, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases.
A total of 32 articles detailing patterns of practice and clinical practice guidelines were included for final synthesis. The majority of organizations have released high level recommendations for SFRT use in treatment of uncomplicated BM, based on evidence of non-inferiority to MFRT. There are key differences between guidelines, such as varying strengths of recommendation for SFRT use over MFRT; contraindication in vertebral sites for SFRT; and risk estimation of pathologic fractures after SFRT. Differences in guidelines may be influenced by committee composition and organization mandate. Differences in patterns of practice may be influenced by individual center policies, payment modalities and consideration of patient factors such as age, prognosis, and performance status.
Although there is some variation between groups, the majority of guidelines recommend use of SFRT and others consider it to be a reasonable alternative to MFRT.
单次分割放射治疗(SFRT)因其在缓解单纯性骨转移(BM)方面与多次分割放射治疗(MFRT)等效而被推荐。然而,SFRT 的采用速度一直很慢。
使用灰色文献在线存储库、Ovid MEDLINE、Embase 和 Embase Classic 以及 Cochrane 对照试验中心注册数据库,对 2014 年后发表的研究进行了文献检索。
共有 32 篇详细描述实践模式和临床实践指南的文章被纳入最终综合分析。大多数组织根据 MFRT 非劣效性的证据,发布了 SFRT 用于治疗单纯性 BM 的高级别推荐。指南之间存在关键差异,例如 SFRT 与 MFRT 的使用推荐强度不同;SFRT 禁忌用于椎体部位;以及 SFRT 后病理性骨折的风险评估。指南中的差异可能受到委员会组成和组织任务的影响。实践模式的差异可能受到个别中心政策、支付方式以及患者年龄、预后和表现状态等因素的考虑的影响。
尽管各组织之间存在一些差异,但大多数指南都推荐使用 SFRT,其他指南也认为它是 MFRT 的合理替代方案。