Chow Ronald, Hoskin Peter, Hollenberg Drew, Lam Michael, Dennis Kristopher, Lutz Stephen, Lam Henry, Mesci Aruz, DeAngelis Carlo, Chan Stephanie, Chow Edward
Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Mount Vernon Hospital, Imperial College, London, England.
Ann Palliat Med. 2017 Apr;6(2):125-142. doi: 10.21037/apm.2016.12.04. Epub 2017 Jan 9.
Single fraction radiotherapy (SFRT) and multiple fraction radiotherapy (MFRT) are effective for painful uncomplicated bone metastases and have been shown to be of similar efficacy. The optimal conventional external beam SFRT dose for maximum pain relief remains uncertain. The aim of this systematic review was to comprehensively review and synthesize overall pain response rates by dose.
A literature search was conducted in Ovid MEDLINE(R) (1946 to June 2016 week 3), Embase Classic & Embase (1947 to 2016 week 26) and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (May 2016) using keywords such as bone metastases, radiotherapy and single fraction (SF).
The 635 results from the search were screened, and ultimately 27 were included for quantitative synthesis. The review indicated that 10 and 6 Gy may produce superior overall response (OR) and complete response (CR) rates compared to 8 Gy, and 6 Gy may result in better partial response (PR) than 8 Gy. However, only a few studies documented doses other than 8 Gy. In trials that directly compared 8 Gy to 4 Gy or 6 Gy, 8 Gy was deemed statistically superior.
8 Gy SFRT was the most commonly administered dose for palliation of bone metastases supporting its efficacy and safety. Future studies should explore the efficacy of 10 Gy while minimizing its side effects.
单次分割放射治疗(SFRT)和多次分割放射治疗(MFRT)对疼痛性非复杂性骨转移有效,且已显示出相似的疗效。对于实现最大程度的疼痛缓解而言,最佳的传统外照射SFRT剂量仍不确定。本系统评价的目的是全面回顾并综合按剂量划分的总体疼痛缓解率。
在Ovid MEDLINE®(1946年至2016年第3周)、Embase Classic & Embase(1947年至2016年第26周)和Cochrane对照试验中心注册库(2016年5月)中进行文献检索,使用诸如骨转移、放射治疗和单次分割(SF)等关键词。
对检索得到的635条结果进行筛选,最终纳入27条进行定量合成。该评价表明,与8 Gy相比,10 Gy和6 Gy可能产生更高的总体缓解(OR)率和完全缓解(CR)率,并且6 Gy可能比8 Gy产生更好的部分缓解(PR)。然而,仅有少数研究记录了8 Gy以外的剂量。在将8 Gy与4 Gy或6 Gy直接比较的试验中,8 Gy在统计学上被认为更优。
8 Gy SFRT是用于缓解骨转移最常用的剂量,这支持了其疗效和安全性。未来的研究应探索10 Gy的疗效,同时尽量减少其副作用。