• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

创伤性脑损伤一年后关于健康相关生活质量的患者代理协议。

Patient-Proxy Agreement on the Health-Related Quality of Life One Year After Traumatic Brain Injury.

作者信息

Hwang Hei-Fen, Chen Chih-Yi, Lin Mau-Roung

机构信息

Department of Nursing, National Taipei University of Nursing and Health Sciences, Taipei, Taiwan; Institute of Injury Prevention and Control, College of Public Health, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan.

Institute of Injury Prevention and Control, College of Public Health, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan.

出版信息

Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2017 Dec;98(12):2540-2547. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2017.05.013. Epub 2017 Jun 16.

DOI:10.1016/j.apmr.2017.05.013
PMID:28629989
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To examine the level of agreement between patients and their proxies on a measure of health-related quality of life (HRQL) 1 year after traumatic brain injury (TBI).

DESIGN

A cross-sectional study.

SETTING

Four hospitals in Taipei.

PARTICIPANTS

Participants (N=176) were patients with TBI (n=88) identified from discharge records of 4 hospitals in Taiwan and family members or friends (n=88) who could answer questions regarding the patient's health and HRQL 1 year after the injury.

INTERVENTIONS

Not applicable.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

A health profile of the brief Taiwanese version of the World Health Organization Quality of Life (WHOQOL-BREF) and 2 health utility measures of the time tradeoff (TTO) and standard gamble (SG).

RESULTS

Compared with proxy responses, patients provided higher ratings on the domains of the WHOQOL-BREF and lower ratings on the TTO and SG. Intraclass correlation coefficients between patient and proxy ratings varied among the 4 domains of the WHOQOL-BREF, in which levels of agreement were moderate or good for physical capacity (.69) and low for psychological well-being (.45), social relationships (.24), and the environment (.32). Levels of agreement were extremely low for the TTO (0.0) and SG (.10). A profile analysis showed that patients' ratings on the WHOQOL-BREF, on average, were significantly greater than those of their proxies (mean difference, 3.07), with a similar distribution of scatter responses (mean difference, .002) and shape agreement (mean difference, .57). Greater variations in the patient-proxy level of agreement appeared in patients who were younger and had more severe injuries, and also with parent and child proxies.

CONCLUSIONS

To assess the HRQL of patients with a TBI, the level of patient-proxy agreement was adequate for the physical domain but was lower for the social and environmental domains, and the agreement was very low for the TTO and SG. Furthermore, a patient's age and injury severity, and the patient-proxy' relationship may affect the agreement.

摘要

目的

研究创伤性脑损伤(TBI)1年后患者与其代理人在健康相关生活质量(HRQL)测量方面的一致性水平。

设计

横断面研究。

地点

台北的四家医院。

参与者

参与者(N = 176)包括从台湾四家医院出院记录中确定患有TBI的患者(n = 88)以及能够回答有关患者受伤1年后健康状况和HRQL问题的家庭成员或朋友(n = 88)。

干预措施

不适用。

主要观察指标

台湾版世界卫生组织生活质量简表(WHOQOL - BREF)的健康概况以及时间权衡法(TTO)和标准博弈法(SG)这两种健康效用测量方法。

结果

与代理人的回答相比,患者对WHOQOL - BREF各领域的评分更高,而对TTO和SG的评分更低。患者与代理人评分之间的组内相关系数在WHOQOL - BREF的4个领域中各不相同,其中身体功能领域的一致性水平为中等或良好(.69),而心理健康(.45)、社会关系(.24)和环境(.32)领域的一致性水平较低。TTO(0.0)和SG(.10)的一致性水平极低。轮廓分析表明,患者对WHOQOL - BREF的评分平均显著高于其代理人(平均差异为3.07),散射反应分布相似(平均差异为.002)且形状一致性良好(平均差异为.57)。患者与代理人一致性水平的差异在年龄较小、损伤较严重的患者以及父母和子女作为代理人的情况中更为明显。

结论

评估TBI患者的HRQL时,患者与代理人在身体领域的一致性水平足够,但在社会和环境领域较低,而在TTO和SG方面的一致性非常低。此外,患者的年龄、损伤严重程度以及患者与代理人的关系可能会影响一致性。

相似文献

1
Patient-Proxy Agreement on the Health-Related Quality of Life One Year After Traumatic Brain Injury.创伤性脑损伤一年后关于健康相关生活质量的患者代理协议。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2017 Dec;98(12):2540-2547. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2017.05.013. Epub 2017 Jun 16.
2
Longitudinal changes in the health-related quality of life during the first year after traumatic brain injury.创伤性脑损伤后第一年健康相关生活质量的纵向变化。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2010 Mar;91(3):474-80. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2009.10.031.
3
Use of the WHOQOL-BREF for evaluating persons with traumatic brain injury.使用世界卫生组织生活质量简表评估创伤性脑损伤患者。
J Neurotrauma. 2006 Nov;23(11):1609-20. doi: 10.1089/neu.2006.23.1609.
4
Development and psychometric properties of the dialysis module of the WHOQOL-BREF Taiwan version.世界卫生组织生活质量简表台湾版透析模块的编制与心理测量特性
J Formos Med Assoc. 2006 Apr;105(4):299-309. doi: 10.1016/s0929-6646(09)60121-2.
5
Examination of assumptions in using time tradeoff and standard gamble utilities in individuals with spinal cord injury.使用时间权衡和标准赌博效用在脊髓损伤个体中的假设检验。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2012 Feb;93(2):245-52. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2011.08.039.
6
Validation of the WHOQOL-BREF and Shorter Versions Using Rasch Analysis in Traumatic Brain Injury and Orthopedic Populations.使用 Rasch 分析验证 WHOQOL-BREF 及简版在创伤性脑损伤和骨科人群中的适用性。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2019 Oct;100(10):1853-1862. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2019.05.029. Epub 2019 Jun 21.
7
Use of the World Health Organization Quality of Life Assessment Short Version in Mild to Moderate Parkinson Disease.世界卫生组织生活质量评估简表在轻度至中度帕金森病中的应用。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2016 Dec;97(12):2123-2129.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2016.05.020. Epub 2016 Jun 23.
8
Agreement Between Responses From Community-Dwelling Persons With Stroke and Their Proxies on the NIH Neurological Quality of Life (Neuro-QoL) Short Forms.社区中风患者与其代理人对美国国立卫生研究院神经生活质量(Neuro-QoL)简表的回答之间的一致性。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2015 Nov;96(11):1986-92.e14. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2015.07.005. Epub 2015 Jul 21.
9
Proxy and patients ratings on quality of life in patients with schizophrenia and bipolar disorder in Korea.韩国精神分裂症和双相情感障碍患者的代理和患者对生活质量的评价。
Qual Life Res. 2010 May;19(4):521-9. doi: 10.1007/s11136-010-9617-5. Epub 2010 Mar 4.
10
How valid are family proxy assessments of stroke patients' health-related quality of life?中风患者健康相关生活质量的家庭代理评估有多有效?
Stroke. 2006 Aug;37(8):2081-5. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000230583.10311.9f. Epub 2006 Jun 29.

引用本文的文献

1
A short scale to measure health-related quality of life after traumatic brain injury in children and adolescents (QOLIBRI-OS-KID/ADO): psychometric properties and German reference values.用于测量儿童和青少年创伤性脑损伤后健康相关生活质量的简短量表(QOLIBRI-OS-KID/ADO):心理测量特性和德国参考值。
Qual Life Res. 2024 Nov;33(11):3039-3056. doi: 10.1007/s11136-024-03764-3. Epub 2024 Aug 31.
2
Assessment by proxy of the SF-36 and WHO-DAS 2.0. A systematic review.代理评估 SF-36 和 WHO-DAS 2.0。系统评价。
J Rehabil Med. 2023 Jun 30;55:jrm4493. doi: 10.2340/jrm.v55.4493.
3
Who Determines the Quality of Life of Survivors of Severe Traumatic Brain Injury?
谁来决定重度创伤性脑损伤幸存者的生活质量?
Neurocrit Care. 2023 Oct;39(2):309-310. doi: 10.1007/s12028-023-01736-y. Epub 2023 Jun 20.
4
Longitudinal study of quality of life in acquired brain injury: A self- and proxy-report evaluation.后天性脑损伤患者生活质量的纵向研究:一项自我报告与代理报告评估
Int J Clin Health Psychol. 2021 May-Aug;21(2):100219. doi: 10.1016/j.ijchp.2020.100219. Epub 2021 Jan 28.
5
Adaptation and validation of the self-report version of the scale for measuring quality of life in people with acquired brain injury (CAVIDACE).适应和验证用于测量后天性脑损伤患者生活质量的自我报告量表(CAVIDACE)的中文版。
Qual Life Res. 2020 Apr;29(4):1107-1121. doi: 10.1007/s11136-019-02386-4. Epub 2019 Dec 18.