• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Facilitating Prospective Registration of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies: A STARD Initiative.

作者信息

Korevaar Daniël A, Hooft Lotty, Askie Lisa M, Barbour Virginia, Faure Hélène, Gatsonis Constantine A, Hunter Kylie E, Kressel Herbert Y, Lippman Hannah, McInnes Matthew D F, Moher David, Rifai Nader, Cohen Jérémie F, Bossuyt Patrick M M

机构信息

Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Academic Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

Netherlands Trial Register and Cochrane Netherlands, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, University of Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.

出版信息

Clin Chem. 2017 Aug;63(8):1331-1341. doi: 10.1373/clinchem.2017.272765. Epub 2017 Jun 19.

DOI:10.1373/clinchem.2017.272765
PMID:28630237
Abstract
摘要

相似文献

1
Facilitating Prospective Registration of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies: A STARD Initiative.促进诊断准确性研究的前瞻性注册：一项STARD倡议。
Clin Chem. 2017 Aug;63(8):1331-1341. doi: 10.1373/clinchem.2017.272765. Epub 2017 Jun 19.
2
An extension of STARD statements for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies on liver fibrosis tests: the Liver-FibroSTARD standards.STARD 声明扩展版：用于报告肝纤维化检测诊断准确性研究的标准——肝纤维化 STARD 标准。
J Hepatol. 2015 Apr;62(4):807-15. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2014.10.042. Epub 2014 Nov 5.
3
STARD-BLCM: Standards for the Reporting of Diagnostic accuracy studies that use Bayesian Latent Class Models.STARD-BLCM：使用贝叶斯潜在类别模型的诊断准确性研究报告标准。
Prev Vet Med. 2017 Mar 1;138:37-47. doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2017.01.006. Epub 2017 Jan 12.
4
Quality of reporting of test accuracy studies in reproductive medicine: impact of the Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy (STARD) initiative.生殖医学中检验准确性研究的报告质量：诊断准确性报告标准（STARD）倡议的影响
Fertil Steril. 2006 Nov;86(5):1321-9. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.03.050. Epub 2006 Sep 14.
5
Childhood cancer registration in New Zealand: A registry collaboration to assess and improve data quality.新西兰儿童癌症登记：一项旨在评估和提高数据质量的登记合作项目。
Cancer Epidemiol. 2018 Aug;55:104-109. doi: 10.1016/j.canep.2018.06.001. Epub 2018 Jun 11.
6
Diagnostic accuracy research in glaucoma is still incompletely reported: An application of Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (STARD) 2015.青光眼的诊断准确性研究报告仍不完整：应用 2015 年诊断准确性研究报告标准（STARD）。
PLoS One. 2017 Dec 14;12(12):e0189716. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0189716. eCollection 2017.
7
Reproducibility of the STARD checklist: an instrument to assess the quality of reporting of diagnostic accuracy studies.STARD 清单的可重复性：一种评估诊断准确性研究报告质量的工具。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2006 Mar 15;6:12. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-6-12.
8
Reporting of imaging diagnostic accuracy studies with focus on MRI subgroup: Adherence to STARD 2015.MRI 亚组成像诊断准确性研究报告：对 STARD 2015 的遵循情况。
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2018 Feb;47(2):523-544. doi: 10.1002/jmri.25797. Epub 2017 Jun 22.
9
Quality of reporting of diagnostic accuracy studies.诊断准确性研究的报告质量。
Radiology. 2005 May;235(2):347-53. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2352040507. Epub 2005 Mar 15.
10
Reporting standards in cardiac MRI, CT, and SPECT diagnostic accuracy studies: analysis of the impact of STARD criteria.心脏 MRI、CT 和 SPECT 诊断准确性研究的报告标准：STARD 标准的影响分析。
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2014 Jun;15(6):691-700. doi: 10.1093/ehjci/jet277. Epub 2014 Jan 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Defining a malaria diagnostic pathway from innovation to adoption: Stakeholder perspectives on data and evidence gaps.界定从创新到应用的疟疾诊断路径：利益相关者对数据及证据缺口的看法
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2024 May 16;4(5):e0002957. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0002957. eCollection 2024.
2
Estimating the prevalence of discrepancies between study registrations and publications: a systematic review and meta-analyses.评估研究注册与出版物之间差异的发生率：系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMJ Open. 2023 Oct 4;13(10):e076264. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-076264.
3
Detection of cerebral aneurysms using artificial intelligence: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
使用人工智能检测脑动脉瘤：系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Neurointerv Surg. 2023 Mar;15(3):262-271. doi: 10.1136/jnis-2022-019456. Epub 2022 Nov 14.
4
Reporting of Artificial Intelligence Diagnostic Accuracy Studies in Pathology Abstracts: Compliance with STARD for Abstracts Guidelines.病理学摘要中人工智能诊断准确性研究的报告：遵循摘要的STARD指南
J Pathol Inform. 2022 Feb 18;13:100091. doi: 10.1016/j.jpi.2022.100091. eCollection 2022.
5
PRISMA-DTA for Abstracts: a new addition to the toolbox for test accuracy research.摘要的PRISMA-DTA：测试准确性研究工具箱的新成员。
Diagn Progn Res. 2021 Apr 2;5(1):8. doi: 10.1186/s41512-021-00097-4.
6
Designing deep learning studies in cancer diagnostics.设计癌症诊断的深度学习研究。
Nat Rev Cancer. 2021 Mar;21(3):199-211. doi: 10.1038/s41568-020-00327-9. Epub 2021 Jan 29.
7
A Clinician's Guide to Artificial Intelligence: How to Critically Appraise Machine Learning Studies.《临床医师人工智能指南：如何批判性地评价机器学习研究》
Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2020 Feb 12;9(2):7. doi: 10.1167/tvst.9.2.7.
8
Searching practices and inclusion of unpublished studies in systematic reviews of diagnostic accuracy.诊断准确性系统评价中检索实践和未发表研究的纳入。
Res Synth Methods. 2020 May;11(3):343-353. doi: 10.1002/jrsm.1389. Epub 2020 Feb 5.
9
Publication bias in diagnostic imaging: conference abstracts with positive conclusions are more likely to be published.诊断影像学中的发表偏倚：具有阳性结论的会议摘要更有可能被发表。
Eur Radiol. 2020 May;30(5):2964-2972. doi: 10.1007/s00330-019-06568-z. Epub 2020 Jan 17.
10
Diagnostic accuracy studies need more informative abstracts.诊断准确性研究需要更具信息量的摘要。
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2019 Aug;38(8):1383-1385. doi: 10.1007/s10096-019-03570-7.