• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

PRISMA-DTA for Abstracts: a new addition to the toolbox for test accuracy research.

作者信息

Korevaar Daniël A, Bossuyt Patrick M, McInnes Matthew D F, Cohen Jérémie F

机构信息

Department of Respiratory Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105, AZ, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

出版信息

Diagn Progn Res. 2021 Apr 2;5(1):8. doi: 10.1186/s41512-021-00097-4.

DOI:10.1186/s41512-021-00097-4
PMID:33795016
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8017829/
Abstract
摘要

相似文献

1
PRISMA-DTA for Abstracts: a new addition to the toolbox for test accuracy research.摘要的PRISMA-DTA：测试准确性研究工具箱的新成员。
Diagn Progn Res. 2021 Apr 2;5(1):8. doi: 10.1186/s41512-021-00097-4.
2
Completeness of Reporting of Systematic Reviews of Diagnostic Test Accuracy Based on the PRISMA-DTA Reporting Guideline.基于 PRISMA-DTA 报告准则的诊断性测试准确性系统评价报告的完整性。
Clin Chem. 2019 Feb;65(2):291-301. doi: 10.1373/clinchem.2018.292987. Epub 2018 Sep 20.
3
Steps toward more complete reporting of systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy: Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Diagnostic Test Accuracy (PRISMA-DTA).系统评价诊断准确性研究报告的改进步骤：诊断准确性系统评价和 Meta 分析的首选报告项目（PRISMA-DTA）。
Syst Rev. 2019 Jul 11;8(1):166. doi: 10.1186/s13643-019-1090-9.
4
Reporting quality in abstracts of meta-analyses of depression screening tool accuracy: a review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses.抑郁症筛查工具准确性的Meta分析摘要中的报告质量：系统评价和Meta分析综述
BMJ Open. 2016 Nov 18;6(11):e012867. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012867.
5
PRISMA-DTA: An Extension of PRISMA for Reporting of Diagnostic Test Accuracy Systematic Reviews.PRISMA-DTA：用于报告诊断试验准确性系统评价的PRISMA扩展版。
Clin Chem. 2018 Jun 1;64(6):985-986. doi: 10.1373/clinchem.2018.289637.
6
The Emtree term "diagnostic test accuracy study" retrieved less than half of the diagnostic accuracy studies in Embase.Emtree 中的“诊断测试准确性研究”检索到的诊断准确性研究不足 Embase 的一半。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2020 Oct;126:116-121. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.06.030. Epub 2020 Jun 29.
7
Recommendations for reporting of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of diagnostic test accuracy: a systematic review.诊断测试准确性的系统评价和荟萃分析报告建议：系统评价。
Syst Rev. 2017 Oct 10;6(1):194. doi: 10.1186/s13643-017-0590-8.
8
Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Diagnostic Test Accuracy: The PRISMA-DTA Statement.诊断试验准确性的系统评价和Meta分析：PRISMA-DTA声明。
Radiology. 2018 Nov;289(2):313-314. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2018180850. Epub 2018 Jul 17.
9
Publication Bias: Association of Diagnostic Accuracy in Radiology Conference Abstracts with Full-Text Publication.发表偏倚：放射学会议摘要的诊断准确性与全文发表的关联。
Radiology. 2019 Jul;292(1):120-126. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2019182206. Epub 2019 May 28.
10
Review of Diagnostic Test Accuracy (DTA) studies in older people.老年人诊断测试准确性（DTA）研究综述。
Age Ageing. 2018 May 1;47(3):349-355. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afy023.

引用本文的文献

1
Diagnostic accuracy of severity measures of ICD-11 and DSM-5 personality disorder: clarifying the clinical landscape with the most up-to-date evidence.《国际疾病分类第11版》（ICD - 11）和《精神疾病诊断与统计手册第5版》（DSM - 5）人格障碍严重程度测量的诊断准确性：用最新证据厘清临床现状
Front Psychiatry. 2023 May 30;14:1209679. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1209679. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

1
Preferred reporting items for journal and conference abstracts of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of diagnostic test accuracy studies (PRISMA-DTA for Abstracts): checklist, explanation, and elaboration.诊断试验准确性研究的系统评价和Meta分析的期刊及会议摘要的首选报告项目（PRISMA-DTA摘要版）：清单、解释及详述
BMJ. 2021 Mar 15;372:n265. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n265.
2
Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies (PRISMA-DTA): explanation, elaboration, and checklist.诊断试验准确性研究的系统评价与Meta分析的首选报告项目（PRISMA-DTA）：解释、详述及清单
BMJ. 2020 Aug 14;370:m2632. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m2632.
3
Transparent Reporting of Multivariable Prediction Models in Journal and Conference Abstracts: TRIPOD for Abstracts.多变量预测模型在期刊和会议摘要中的透明报告：摘要的TRIPOD声明
Ann Intern Med. 2020 Jun 2. doi: 10.7326/M20-0193.
4
Reporting guidelines for journal and conference abstracts.期刊和会议摘要的报告指南。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2020 Aug;124:186-192. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.04.012. Epub 2020 Apr 18.
5
Completeness of Reporting of Systematic Reviews of Diagnostic Test Accuracy Based on the PRISMA-DTA Reporting Guideline.基于 PRISMA-DTA 报告准则的诊断性测试准确性系统评价报告的完整性。
Clin Chem. 2019 Feb;65(2):291-301. doi: 10.1373/clinchem.2018.292987. Epub 2018 Sep 20.
6
Updating standards for reporting diagnostic accuracy: the development of STARD 2015.更新诊断准确性报告标准：STARD 2015的制定。
Res Integr Peer Rev. 2016 Jun 7;1:7. doi: 10.1186/s41073-016-0014-7. eCollection 2016.
7
Preferred Reporting Items for a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Diagnostic Test Accuracy Studies: The PRISMA-DTA Statement.诊断测试准确性研究的系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目：PRISMA-DTA 声明。
JAMA. 2018 Jan 23;319(4):388-396. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.19163.
8
Recommendations for reporting of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of diagnostic test accuracy: a systematic review.诊断测试准确性的系统评价和荟萃分析报告建议：系统评价。
Syst Rev. 2017 Oct 10;6(1):194. doi: 10.1186/s13643-017-0590-8.
9
STARD for Abstracts: essential items for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies in journal or conference abstracts.摘要的STARD：在期刊或会议摘要中报告诊断准确性研究的必备项目。
BMJ. 2017 Aug 17;358:j3751. doi: 10.1136/bmj.j3751.
10
Facilitating Prospective Registration of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies: A STARD Initiative.促进诊断准确性研究的前瞻性注册：一项STARD倡议。
Clin Chem. 2017 Aug;63(8):1331-1341. doi: 10.1373/clinchem.2017.272765. Epub 2017 Jun 19.