• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Peer Evaluation Instrument Development, Administration, and Assessment in a Team-based Learning Curriculum.基于团队学习课程的同伴评价工具开发、管理与评估
Am J Pharm Educ. 2017 May;81(4):68. doi: 10.5688/ajpe81468.
2
Collaborative Learning Teams to Longitudinally Teach and Assess Teamwork Behaviors and Attitudes.协作学习团队对团队合作行为和态度进行纵向教学和评估。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2019 Nov;83(9):7255. doi: 10.5688/ajpe7255.
3
Validity and reliability assessment of a peer evaluation method in team-based learning classes.基于团队学习课程的同伴评价方法的效度与信度评估
Korean J Med Educ. 2018 Mar;30(1):23-29. doi: 10.3946/kjme.2018.78. Epub 2018 Feb 28.
4
Effect of prior knowledge and peer evaluation ratings on final exam performance in a team-based learning chemistry course.先验知识和同伴评估评分对基于团队学习的化学课程期末考试成绩的影响。
Curr Pharm Teach Learn. 2022 Aug;14(8):998-1003. doi: 10.1016/j.cptl.2022.07.016. Epub 2022 Jul 22.
5
A Novel Approach to Assessing Professionalism in Preclinical Medical Students Using Multisource Feedback Through Paired Self- and Peer Evaluations.一种通过配对的自我和同伴评估使用多源反馈来评估临床前医学生职业素养的新方法。
Teach Learn Med. 2017 Oct-Dec;29(4):402-410. doi: 10.1080/10401334.2017.1306446. Epub 2017 May 12.
6
Pharmacy students' perceptions toward peer assessment and its use in teaching patient presentation skills.药学专业学生对同伴评估及其在患者表现技能教学中的应用的看法。
Curr Pharm Teach Learn. 2020 Feb;12(2):228-236. doi: 10.1016/j.cptl.2019.10.012. Epub 2019 Nov 25.
7
Leadership Identity Development Through Reflection and Feedback in Team-Based Learning Medical Student Teams.通过基于团队的学习医学生团队中的反思与反馈进行领导力身份发展
Teach Learn Med. 2018 Jan-Mar;30(1):76-83. doi: 10.1080/10401334.2017.1331134. Epub 2017 Jul 28.
8
Team-based learning replaces problem-based learning at a large medical school.以团队为基础的学习取代了一所大型医学院的以问题为基础的学习。
BMC Med Educ. 2020 Dec 7;20(1):492. doi: 10.1186/s12909-020-02362-4.
9
Small-team active learning in an integrated pharmacokinetics course series.小团队在综合药代动力学课程系列中的主动学习。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2012 Oct 12;76(8):153. doi: 10.5688/ajpe768153.
10
Self-Observation and Peer Feedback as a Faculty Development Approach for Problem-Based Learning Tutors: A Program Evaluation.自我观察与同伴反馈作为基于问题学习导师的教师发展方法:一项项目评估
Teach Learn Med. 2017 Jul-Sep;29(3):313-325. doi: 10.1080/10401334.2017.1279056. Epub 2017 Mar 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Implementation of Team-Based Learning: a Tale of Two New Medical Schools.基于团队的学习的实施:两所新医学院的故事。
Med Sci Educ. 2019 Oct 15;29(4):1201-1210. doi: 10.1007/s40670-019-00815-0. eCollection 2019 Dec.
2
Peer review in team-based learning: influencing feedback literacy.基于团队学习的同行评议:影响反馈素养。
BMC Med Educ. 2021 Aug 12;21(1):426. doi: 10.1186/s12909-021-02821-6.
3
A Teamwork Workshop to Improve Pharmacy Students' Growth Mindset and Communication Skills.团队合作工作坊以提升药学学生的成长型思维和沟通技巧。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2021 May;85(5):8269. doi: 10.5688/ajpe8269. Epub 2021 Feb 11.
4
Collaborative Learning Teams to Longitudinally Teach and Assess Teamwork Behaviors and Attitudes.协作学习团队对团队合作行为和态度进行纵向教学和评估。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2019 Nov;83(9):7255. doi: 10.5688/ajpe7255.
5
First year medical student performance on weekly team-based learning exercises in an infectious diseases course: insights from top performers and struggling students.医学一年级学生在传染病课程中每周进行团队学习练习的表现:来自优秀生和困难生的见解。
BMC Med Educ. 2019 Jun 3;19(1):185. doi: 10.1186/s12909-019-1608-9.
6
Exploring assessment of medical students' competencies in pain medicine-A review.探索医学生疼痛医学能力评估——综述
Pain Rep. 2018 Dec 12;4(1):e704. doi: 10.1097/PR9.0000000000000704. eCollection 2019 Jan-Feb.

本文引用的文献

1
Reliability and validity of student peer assessment in medical education: a systematic review.学生同伴评估在医学教育中的可靠性和有效性:系统评价。
Med Teach. 2011;33(11):e572-85. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2011.610835.
2
Evaluating the quality of learning-team processes in medical education: development and validation of a new measure.评估医学教育中学习团队过程的质量:新测量工具的开发和验证。
Acad Med. 2009 Oct;84(10 Suppl):S124-7. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181b38b7a.
3
Peer evaluation in a clinical clerkship: students' attitudes, experiences, and correlations with traditional assessments.临床实习中的同伴评估:学生的态度、经历以及与传统评估的相关性
Acad Psychiatry. 2007 Jan-Feb;31(1):19-24. doi: 10.1176/appi.ap.31.1.19.
4
External validity, generalizability, and knowledge utilization.外部效度、可推广性与知识应用。
J Nurs Scholarsh. 2004;36(1):16-22. doi: 10.1111/j.1547-5069.2004.04006.x.

基于团队学习课程的同伴评价工具开发、管理与评估

Peer Evaluation Instrument Development, Administration, and Assessment in a Team-based Learning Curriculum.

作者信息

Fete Matthew G, Haight Robert C, Clapp Peter, McCollum Marianne

机构信息

Regis University School of Pharmacy, Denver, Colorado.

出版信息

Am J Pharm Educ. 2017 May;81(4):68. doi: 10.5688/ajpe81468.

DOI:10.5688/ajpe81468
PMID:28630509
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5468706/
Abstract

To design and implement an instrument capable of providing students with valuable peer feedback on team behaviors and to provide results of the administration of the instrument. A three-part instrument was designed that requires teammate rankings with justification on attributes aligned with school outcomes and team functioning, reporting of student behaviors, and provision of feedback on the value of peer contributions to their team. Score results after three years of administration were analyzed. Six evaluations per year were completed by members of four different professional classes over a three-year time period. Mean scores increased slightly as students progressed through the program. Students were able to differentially score peers on attributes and behaviors. The peer evaluation instrument presented here provides formative and summative feedback through qualitative and quantitative scores that allow students to acknowledge differential contributions of individual team members.

摘要

设计并实施一种工具,该工具能够为学生提供有关团队行为的宝贵同伴反馈,并提供该工具的管理结果。设计了一个由三部分组成的工具,该工具要求对队友进行排名,并就与学校成果和团队功能相关的属性给出理由,报告学生行为,并就同伴对其团队贡献的价值提供反馈。对实施三年后的得分结果进行了分析。在三年时间里,四个不同专业班级的成员每年完成六次评估。随着学生在课程中的进展,平均得分略有提高。学生能够在属性和行为方面对同伴进行差异化评分。这里介绍的同伴评估工具通过定性和定量分数提供形成性和总结性反馈,使学生能够认识到团队成员个人的不同贡献。