Suppr超能文献

堕胎法与人权中的时间理论

Theorizing Time in Abortion Law and Human Rights.

作者信息

Erdman Joanna N

机构信息

The MacBain Chair in Health Law and Policy at the Schulich School of Law, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada.

出版信息

Health Hum Rights. 2017 Jun;19(1):29-40.

Abstract

The legal regulation of abortion by gestational age, or length of pregnancy, is a relatively undertheorized dimension of abortion and human rights. Yet struggles over time in abortion law, and its competing representations and meanings, are ultimately struggles over ethical and political values, authority and power, the very stakes that human rights on abortion engage. This article focuses on three struggles over time in abortion and human rights law: those related to morality, health, and justice. With respect to morality, the article concludes that collective faith and trust should be placed in the moral judgment of those most affected by the passage of time in pregnancy and by later abortion-pregnant women. With respect to health, abortion law as health regulation should be evidence-based to counter the stigma of later abortion, which leads to overregulation and access barriers. With respect to justice, in recognizing that there will always be a need for abortion services later in pregnancy, such services should be safe, legal, and accessible without hardship or risk. At the same time, justice must address the structural conditions of women's capacity to make timely decisions about abortion, and to access abortion services early in pregnancy.

摘要

根据孕周或怀孕时长对堕胎进行法律规制,是堕胎与人权领域中一个理论阐释相对不足的方面。然而,随着时间推移,围绕堕胎法展开的斗争,以及其相互冲突的表述和意义,归根结底是围绕伦理和政治价值观、权威与权力的斗争,而这些正是堕胎人权所涉及的关键利害关系。本文聚焦于堕胎与人权法随时间推移而展开的三场斗争:与道德、健康和正义相关的斗争。关于道德,本文的结论是,应集体信赖和信任那些受怀孕时间推移及后期堕胎影响最大的人——孕妇——的道德判断。关于健康,作为健康规制的堕胎法应以证据为基础,以消除后期堕胎的污名化,这种污名化导致过度规制和获取障碍。关于正义,鉴于认识到孕期后期始终需要堕胎服务,此类服务应安全、合法且易于获得,不会带来困难或风险。与此同时,正义必须解决影响女性及时做出堕胎决定以及在孕期早期获得堕胎服务能力的结构性条件问题。

相似文献

1
Theorizing Time in Abortion Law and Human Rights.
Health Hum Rights. 2017 Jun;19(1):29-40.
2
Abortion law reform in Nepal.
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2014 Aug;126(2):193-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2014.05.001. Epub 2014 May 15.
3
Access to safe abortion within the limits of the law.
Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2006 Jun;20(3):421-32. doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2006.01.020. Epub 2006 Mar 24.
4
International developments in abortion law from 1988 to 1998.
Am J Public Health. 1999 Apr;89(4):579-86. doi: 10.2105/ajph.89.4.579.
5
Human rights dynamics of abortion law reform.
Hum Rights Q. 2003 Feb;25(1):1-59. doi: 10.1353/hrq.2003.0003.
6
State obligations to implement African abortion laws: employing human rights in a changing legal landscape.
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2012 Nov;119(2):198-202. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2012.08.001. Epub 2012 Aug 31.
7
Legal barriers to access abortion services through a human rights lens: the Uruguayan experience.
Reprod Health Matters. 2018 Dec;26(52):1422664. doi: 10.1080/09688080.2017.1422664.
8
Abortion rights judgment: a ray of hope!
Indian J Med Ethics. 2017 Jul-Sep;2(3):180-183. doi: 10.20529/IJME.2017.044.
9
Access to safe abortion in Uganda: Leveraging opportunities through the harm reduction model.
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2017 Aug;138(2):231-236. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.12190. Epub 2017 May 16.
10
Abortion, asking the rights question?
Law Rev. 1988 Aug;18(3):201-20.

引用本文的文献

1
Obstetricians' views on extending the 12-week abortion limit in Belgium: A qualitative study.
PLoS One. 2025 Jun 18;20(6):e0325434. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0325434. eCollection 2025.
3
Policy surveillance for a global analysis of national abortion laws.
Sex Reprod Health Matters. 2022 Dec;30(1):2064208. doi: 10.1080/26410397.2022.2064208.
4
Is third-trimester abortion exceptional? Two pathways to abortion after 24 weeks of pregnancy in the United States.
Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2022 Jun;54(2):38-45. doi: 10.1363/psrh.12190. Epub 2022 Apr 10.
5
Abortion at the edges: Politics, practices, performances.
Womens Stud Int Forum. 2020 May-Jun;80:102372. doi: 10.1016/j.wsif.2020.102372. Epub 2020 Apr 28.

本文引用的文献

1
We are not Gametes: Distinguishing between Abortion and Contraception.
New Bioeth. 2016 Nov;22(3):202-211. doi: 10.1080/20502877.2016.1238581. Epub 2016 Oct 21.
3
Naegele's rule revisited.
Sex Reprod Healthc. 2016 Jun;8:100-1. doi: 10.1016/j.srhc.2016.01.005. Epub 2016 Feb 4.
4
The regulatory cliff edge between contraception and abortion: the legal and moral significance of implantation.
J Med Ethics. 2015 Sep;41(9):762-5. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2015-102712. Epub 2015 Jun 17.
5
Constructing the meaning of ultrasound viewing in abortion care.
Sociol Health Illn. 2015 Jul;37(6):856-69. doi: 10.1111/1467-9566.12237. Epub 2015 Feb 16.
6
Contesting the cruel treatment of abortion-seeking women.
Reprod Health Matters. 2014 Nov;22(44):10-21. doi: 10.1016/S0968-8080(14)44818-3.
7
The severity of abortion complications in Malawi.
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2015 Feb;128(2):160-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2014.08.022. Epub 2014 Nov 6.
8
Access to and experience of later abortion: accounts from women in Scotland.
Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2014 Jun;46(2):101-8. doi: 10.1363/46e1214. Epub 2014 Apr 30.
10
Rewriting abortion: deploying medical records in jurisdictional negotiation over a forbidden practice in Senegal.
Soc Sci Med. 2014 May;108:20-33. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.02.030. Epub 2014 Feb 19.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验