Suppr超能文献

从基层到爱尔兰议会:爱尔兰共和国的堕胎法改革。

From the Grassroots to the Oireachtas: Abortion Law Reform in the Republic of Ireland.

机构信息

Irish reproductive rights activist and writer based in London. She is an active member of the Abortion Rights Campaign.

US reproductive rights activist and writer based in Dublin. She is an active member of the Abortion Rights Campaign.

出版信息

Health Hum Rights. 2019 Dec;21(2):109-120.

Abstract

In 1983, voters inserted the Eighth Amendment into Ireland's constitution, equating the right to life of a fetus with that of a pregnant person. Hundreds of thousands of women were forced overseas to access basic health care and thousands more were forced underground, importing abortion pills and risking prosecution. The realities of life under the Eighth Amendment sparked a powerful feminist grassroots struggle for abortion access. This article charts the path to abortion law reform in the Republic of Ireland from the perspective of grassroots activists in the Abortion Rights Campaign (ARC). The first half highlights the national and international policy mechanisms that activists leveraged to bring Ireland's abortion regime to the point of reform, as well as the power of challenging abortion stigma to mobilize the public and politicians, culminating in a resounding vote in May 2018 to repeal the Eighth Amendment. The second half analyzes the legislation enacted in late 2018 in order to give effect to the vote. While the new law and its commitment to free abortion is a momentous step for Ireland, it also establishes a needlessly cumbersome regime that remains grounded in a criminal law framework and incorporates barriers that have no grounding in medical evidence.

摘要

1983 年,投票者将第八修正案纳入爱尔兰宪法,将胎儿的生命权等同于孕妇的生命权。数以十万计的妇女被迫前往海外获取基本的医疗保健,还有数以千计的妇女被迫地下堕胎,进口堕胎药并冒着被起诉的风险。第八修正案的现实情况引发了一场强大的女权主义基层争取堕胎权利的斗争。本文从堕胎权利运动(ARC)的基层活动家的角度,描绘了爱尔兰共和国堕胎法改革的道路。前半部分强调了活动家利用的国家和国际政策机制,将爱尔兰的堕胎制度推向改革的临界点,以及挑战堕胎耻辱感的力量来动员公众和政治家,最终在 2018 年 5 月以压倒性多数投票废除第八修正案。后半部分分析了 2018 年底颁布的立法,以实施该投票。虽然新法律及其对免费堕胎的承诺是爱尔兰的一个重大步骤,但它也建立了一个不必要的繁琐制度,仍然基于刑法框架,并包含没有医学证据支持的障碍。

相似文献

2
The Irish Journey: Removing the shackles of abortion restrictions in Ireland.
Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2020 Jan;62:36-48. doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2019.05.011. Epub 2019 May 27.
3
Irish voters repealed the eighth: now it's time to ensure access to abortion care in law and in practice.
Reprod Health Matters. 2018 Dec;26(52):1513271. doi: 10.1080/09688080.2018.1513271.
4
Women's right to health and Ireland's abortion laws.
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2015 Jul;130(1):93-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2015.04.020. Epub 2015 Apr 17.
5
Procedural abortion rights: Ireland and the European Court of Human Rights.
Reprod Health Matters. 2014 Nov;22(44):22-30. doi: 10.1016/S0968-8080(14)44798-0.
7
Can Congress settle the abortion issue?
Hastings Cent Rep. 1982 Jun;12(3):20-8.
9
Conspiracy of silence.
Plan Parent Chall. 1993(1):17-9.
10
Narratives of Irishness and the problem of abortion: the X case 1992.
Fem Rev. 1998 Autumn(60):61-83. doi: 10.1080/014177898339398.

引用本文的文献

1
: a qualitative study on providers' lived experiences with liberalised abortion care in the Republic of Ireland.
Sex Reprod Health Matters. 2023 Dec;31(1):2216526. doi: 10.1080/26410397.2023.2216526.
2
Abortion policy implementation in Ireland: Lessons from the community model of care.
PLoS One. 2022 May 9;17(5):e0264494. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0264494. eCollection 2022.
4
Mandatory Waiting Periods Before Abortion and Sterilization: Theory and Practice.
Int J Womens Health. 2020 Jul 31;12:577-586. doi: 10.2147/IJWH.S257178. eCollection 2020.

本文引用的文献

1
Theorizing Time in Abortion Law and Human Rights.
Health Hum Rights. 2017 Jun;19(1):29-40.
2
Fatal Foetal Abnormality, Irish Constitutional Law, and Mellet v Ireland.
Med Law Rev. 2016 Autumn;24(4):591-607. doi: 10.1093/medlaw/fww040. Epub 2016 Dec 27.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验