Gianella Camila
A postdoctoral fellow in the Department of Comparative Politics, University of Bergen, Norway, and at the Chr. Michelsen Institute, Bergen, Norway.
Health Hum Rights. 2017 Jun;19(1):133-148.
State and non-state actors engaged in disputes to expand and limit abortion rights have engaged in legal mobilization-in other words, strategies using rights and law as a central tool for advancing contested political goals. Peru, like other Latin American countries, has experienced an increase in abortion rights legal mobilization in recent years, including litigation before national and international courts. This paper centers on societal legal mobilization, or the legal mobilization that occurs outside the legislative and judicial branches and that includes strategies promoted by the executive branch, political actors, and non-partisan organizations and individuals. It presents an analysis of op-ed articles published in two national newspapers, and , between 1990 and 2015. The paper argues that the media is also an arena where legal mobilization takes place and is not just a space influenced by legal mobilization. Rather, the media's agenda operates independently of legal mobilization in the legislature and the courts, and it determines whether certain issues receive coverage and the way these issues are framed.
参与扩大和限制堕胎权利争端的国家和非国家行为体进行了法律动员——换句话说，就是将权利和法律作为推进有争议政治目标的核心工具的策略。秘鲁与其他拉丁美洲国家一样，近年来堕胎权利法律动员有所增加，包括在国内和国际法院提起诉讼。本文关注的是社会法律动员，即在立法和司法部门之外发生的法律动员，包括行政部门、政治行为体以及无党派组织和个人推动的策略。本文对1990年至2015年间在两家全国性报纸《》和《》上发表的专栏文章进行了分析。本文认为，媒体也是法律动员发生的一个领域，而不仅仅是受法律动员影响的一个空间。相反，媒体的议程独立于立法机构和法院的法律动员运作，它决定了某些问题是否得到报道以及这些问题的呈现方式。
