Cipryan Lukas, Tschakert Gerhard, Hofmann Peter
Human Motion Diagnostic Centre & Department of Human Movement Studies, Ostrava University, Czech Republic.
Institute of Sports Science, Exercise Physiology, Training & Training Therapy Research Group, University of Graz, Austria.
J Sports Sci Med. 2017 Jun 1;16(2):219-229. eCollection 2017 Jun.
The purpose of the presented study was to compare acute and post-exercise differences in cardiorespiratory, metabolic, cardiac autonomic, inflammatory and muscle damage responses to high-intensity interval exercise (HIIT) between endurance and sprint athletes. The study group consisted of sixteen highly-trained males (age 22.1 ± 2.5 years) participating in endurance (n = 8) or sprint (n = 8) sporting events. All the participants underwent three exercise sessions: short HIIT (work interval duration 30s), long HIIT (3min) and constant load exercise (CE). The exercise interventions were matched for mean power, total time and in case of HIIT interventions also for work-to-relief ratio. The acute cardiorespiratory (HR, O, RER) and metabolic (lactate) variables as well as the post-exercise changes (up to 3 h) in the heart rate variability, inflammation (interleukin-6, leucocytes) and muscle damage (creatine kinase, myoglobin) were monitored. Endurance athletes performed exercise interventions with (CE) or (both HIIT modes) higher mean O. These differences were when O was expressed as a percentage of O. to lower RER and lactate values were found in endurance athletes. Markers of cardiac autonomic regulation, inflammation and muscle damage did not reveal any considerable differences between endurance and sprint athletes. In conclusions, endurance athletes were able to perform both HIIT formats with increased reliance on aerobic metabolic pathways although exercise intensity was identical in relative terms for all the participants. However, other markers of the acute and early post-exercise physiological response to these HIIT interventions indicated similarities between endurance and sprint athletes.
本研究的目的是比较耐力运动员和短跑运动员在高强度间歇运动(HIIT)后,心肺、代谢、心脏自主神经、炎症和肌肉损伤反应方面的急性和运动后差异。研究组由16名训练有素的男性(年龄22.1±2.5岁)组成,他们分别参加耐力项目(n = 8)或短跑项目(n = 8)的体育赛事。所有参与者都进行了三次运动训练:短时间HIIT(工作间歇时长30秒)、长时间HIIT(3分钟)和恒定负荷运动(CE)。运动干预在平均功率、总时间方面进行了匹配,对于HIIT干预,还在工作与休息比例方面进行了匹配。监测了急性心肺(心率、摄氧量、呼吸交换率)和代谢(乳酸)变量,以及运动后心率变异性、炎症(白细胞介素-6、白细胞)和肌肉损伤(肌酸激酶、肌红蛋白)的变化(长达3小时)。耐力运动员在进行运动干预时,无论是CE还是两种HIIT模式,平均摄氧量都更高。当摄氧量以摄氧量百分比表示时,这些差异并不显著。耐力运动员的呼吸交换率和乳酸值降低了20%至30%。心脏自主神经调节、炎症和肌肉损伤的标志物在耐力运动员和短跑运动员之间没有显示出任何显著差异。总之,尽管所有参与者的运动强度在相对水平上相同,但耐力运动员能够以增加对有氧代谢途径的依赖来进行两种HIIT形式的运动。然而,这些HIIT干预的急性和运动后早期生理反应的其他标志物表明,耐力运动员和短跑运动员之间存在相似之处。