UMR1153 - Obstetrical, Perinatal and Paediatric Epidemiology (EPOPé research team), DHU Risks in Pregnancy, Paris Descartes University - INSERM, Paris, France.
Epidemiology and Clinical Research Department, URC Paris-Nord, APHP, Paris, France.
BJOG. 2018 Apr;125(5):587-595. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.14794. Epub 2017 Aug 2.
Because the effectiveness of antenatal care in reducing pregnancy complications is still discussed despite widespread recommendations of its use, we sought to assess the association between utilisation of recommended antenatal care and severe maternal (SMM) and perinatal morbidity (SPM).
Prospective cohort study.
Four maternity units around Paris in 2010-2012.
9117 women with singleton pregnancies.
Logistic regression models adjusted for maternal social, demographic and medical characteristics.
Antenatal care utilisation was assessed by: (1) initiation of care after 14 weeks, (2) < 50% of recommended visits made, according to gestational age, (3) absence of the first, second or third trimester ultrasounds, (4) two modified Adequacy of Prenatal Care Utilisation indexes, combining these components. The two main outcomes were composite variables of SMM and SPM.
According to the modified Adequacy of Prenatal Care Utilisation index, 34.6% of women had inadequate antenatal care utilisation; the incidence of severe maternal morbidity (SMM) was 2.9% and severe perinatal morbidity (SPM) 5.5%. A percentage of recommended visits below 50% (2.6% of women) was associated with SMM [adjusted odds ratio (OR) 2.40 (1.38-4.17)] and SPM [aOR 2.27 (1.43-3.59)]. Late initiation of care (17.0% of women) was not associated with SMM or SPM. Failure to undergo the recommended ultrasounds (16, 17 and 22% of women) was associated with SPM. Inadequate antenatal care utilisation according to the index was associated with SPM [aOR 1.37 (1.05-1.80)].
Inadequate antenatal care utilisation is associated with SMM and SPM, to degrees that vary with the component of care and the outcome considered.
Inadequate antenatal care utilisation is associated with severe maternal and perinatal morbidity.
尽管广泛推荐使用产前护理,但仍在讨论其在降低妊娠并发症方面的有效性,因此我们旨在评估推荐的产前护理利用与严重产妇(SMM)和围产儿发病率(SPM)之间的关联。
前瞻性队列研究。
2010-2012 年巴黎周边的四个产科单位。
9117 名单胎妊娠妇女。
通过以下方式调整孕产妇社会、人口统计学和医疗特征的逻辑回归模型来评估产前护理的利用情况:(1)14 周后开始护理,(2)根据孕龄,<50%的推荐就诊次数,(3)缺乏第一次、第二次或第三次超声检查,(4)两个改良的产前护理利用充足度指数,结合这些组成部分。两个主要结局是 SMM 和 SPM 的复合变量。
根据改良的产前护理利用充足度指数,34.6%的女性产前护理利用不足;严重产妇发病率(SMM)为 2.9%,严重围产儿发病率(SPM)为 5.5%。低于 50%的推荐就诊次数(占女性的 2.6%)与 SMM[调整后的优势比(OR)2.40(1.38-4.17)]和 SPM[aOR 2.27(1.43-3.59)]相关。护理开始较晚(占女性的 17.0%)与 SMM 或 SPM 无关。未能进行推荐的超声检查(占女性的 16、17 和 22%)与 SPM 相关。根据指数,产前护理利用不足与 SPM 相关[aOR 1.37(1.05-1.80)]。
产前护理利用不足与 SMM 和 SPM 相关,其关联程度因所考虑的护理内容和结局而异。
产前护理利用不足与严重产妇和围产儿发病率相关。