• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

与乐于助人或不太乐于助人的协同者合作如何影响钉板任务中的联合行动。

How Working With a Helpful Versus Less Helpful Confederate Influences Joint-Action in a Pegboard Task.

作者信息

Scharoun Sara, Mintz Adam, Glazebrook Cheryl M, Roy Eric, Gonzalez Dave

机构信息

a School of Physical and Health Education, Nipissing University , North Bay , Canada.

b Department of Kinesiology , University of Waterloo , Waterloo , Canada.

出版信息

J Mot Behav. 2017 Nov-Dec;49(6):619-628. doi: 10.1080/00222895.2016.1250715. Epub 2017 Mar 1.

DOI:10.1080/00222895.2016.1250715
PMID:28632099
Abstract

Actors change their movement strategies to complement a coactor's movements when performing cooperative tasks. To further investigate this topic, the authors designed a pegboard task whereby a participant-confederate pair worked together to move a peg from one side of the board to the other. The authors examined how the experience of working with a helpful confederate versus less helpful confederate influenced the participant's movement behavior. Results provide evidence that participants change their movement behaviors in response to the actions of the confederate. Here the human capacity to act in such a manner exemplifies an individual's ability to utilize his or her own action system to understand others and interact to complete joint action tasks. Individuals appear to adapt their behavior to their experiences, and thus may be helpful in some contexts and less helpful in others.

摘要

在执行合作任务时,参与者会改变他们的运动策略以配合合作者的动作。为了进一步研究这个课题,作者设计了一个钉板任务,即参与者与一名同谋者合作,将一个钉子从板子的一侧移到另一侧。作者研究了与一个乐于助人的同谋者和一个不太乐于助人的同谋者合作的经历如何影响参与者的运动行为。结果表明,参与者会根据同谋者的行为改变自己的运动行为。在这里,人类以这种方式行动的能力体现了个人利用自己的行动系统来理解他人并进行互动以完成联合行动任务的能力。个体似乎会根据自己的经历调整行为,因此在某些情况下可能有帮助,而在其他情况下则帮助较小。

相似文献

1
How Working With a Helpful Versus Less Helpful Confederate Influences Joint-Action in a Pegboard Task.与乐于助人或不太乐于助人的协同者合作如何影响钉板任务中的联合行动。
J Mot Behav. 2017 Nov-Dec;49(6):619-628. doi: 10.1080/00222895.2016.1250715. Epub 2017 Mar 1.
2
Co-representation of others' task constraints in joint action.联合行动中对他人任务限制的共同表征。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2017 Aug;43(8):1480-1493. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000403. Epub 2017 Apr 3.
3
Entrainment and task co-representation effects for discrete and continuous action sequences.离散和连续动作序列的同步及任务共同表征效应
Psychon Bull Rev. 2015 Dec;22(6):1685-91. doi: 10.3758/s13423-015-0831-6.
4
Response selection during a joint action task.联合行动任务中的反应选择。
J Mot Behav. 2011;43(4):329-32. doi: 10.1080/00222895.2011.592871.
5
Sense of agency in joint action: influence of human and computer co-actors.共同动作中的主体感:人与计算机共同作用者的影响。
Exp Brain Res. 2011 Jun;211(3-4):663-70. doi: 10.1007/s00221-011-2662-7. Epub 2011 Apr 19.
6
The role of predictability in cooperative and competitive joint action.可预测性在合作与竞争联合行动中的作用。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2017 Apr;43(4):644-650. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000362.
7
Interplay between action and movement intentions during social interaction.社会互动中动作与运动意图的相互作用。
Psychol Sci. 2012 Jan 1;23(1):30-5. doi: 10.1177/0956797611424163. Epub 2011 Dec 8.
8
Avoiding Accidents at the Champagne Reception.避免香槟招待会上的意外事故。
Psychol Sci. 2017 Mar;28(3):338-345. doi: 10.1177/0956797616683015. Epub 2017 Jan 1.
9
Social categorization and cooperation in motor joint action: evidence for a joint end-state comfort.运动联合动作中的社会分类与合作:联合终态舒适度的证据
Exp Brain Res. 2015 Aug;233(8):2323-34. doi: 10.1007/s00221-015-4301-1. Epub 2015 May 12.
10
Index of difficulty and side of space are accommodated during the selection and planning of a joint action.在联合行动的选择和规划过程中,会考虑难度指数和空间方位。
Hum Mov Sci. 2017 Aug;54:197-209. doi: 10.1016/j.humov.2017.05.009. Epub 2017 May 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Infants expect agents to minimize the collective cost of collaborative actions.婴儿期望行为体将协作行为的总成本最小化。
Sci Rep. 2022 Oct 12;12(1):17088. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-21452-5.
2
Is it valid to assess an individual's performance in team training simulation when the supporting team are confederates? A controlled and randomized clinical trial.当支持团队是同谋时,评估个体在团队培训模拟中的表现是否有效?一项对照和随机临床试验。
BMC Med Educ. 2022 Sep 19;22(1):685. doi: 10.1186/s12909-022-03747-3.
3
The influence of object size on second-order planning in an overturned cup task.
物体大小对翻转杯子任务中二阶规划的影响。
Psychol Res. 2022 Mar;86(2):642-650. doi: 10.1007/s00426-021-01509-2. Epub 2021 Apr 4.
4
Rationality in Joint Action: Maximizing Coefficiency in Coordination.联合行动中的理性:协调中效率的最大化。
Psychol Sci. 2019 Jun;30(6):930-941. doi: 10.1177/0956797619842550. Epub 2019 May 14.