• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

运动联合动作中的社会分类与合作:联合终态舒适度的证据

Social categorization and cooperation in motor joint action: evidence for a joint end-state comfort.

作者信息

Dötsch Dominik, Schubö Anna

机构信息

Cognitive Neuroscience of Perception and Action, Faculty of Psychology, Philipps-Universität Marburg, Gutenbergstrasse 18, 35032, Marburg, Germany,

出版信息

Exp Brain Res. 2015 Aug;233(8):2323-34. doi: 10.1007/s00221-015-4301-1. Epub 2015 May 12.

DOI:10.1007/s00221-015-4301-1
PMID:25963752
Abstract

The present study investigated to what extent group membership affects an actor's representation of their partner's task in cooperative joint action. Participants performed a joint pick-and-place task in a naturalistic, breakfast-table-like paradigm which allowed the demonstration of varying degrees of cooperation. Participants transported a wooden cup from one end of a table to the other, with one actor moving it to an intermediate position from where their partner transported it to a goal position. Hand and finger movements were recorded via 3D motion tracking to assess actors' cooperative behavior. Before the joint action task was performed, participants were categorized as belonging to the same or to different groups, supposedly based on an assessment of their cognitive processing styles. Results showed that the orientation of the actors' fingers when picking up the cup was affected by its required angle at the goal position. When placing the cup at the intermediate position, most actors adapted the rotation of the cup's handle to the joint action goal, thereby facilitating the partner's subsequent movement. Male actors demonstrated such cooperative behavior only when performing the task together with an ingroup partner, while female actors demonstrated cooperative behavior irrespective of social categorization. These results suggest that actors tend to represent a partner's end-state comfort and integrate it into their own movement planning in cooperative joint action. However, social factors like group membership may modulate this tendency.

摘要

本研究调查了群体成员身份在多大程度上影响参与者在合作性联合行动中对其伙伴任务的表征。参与者在一个类似早餐桌的自然主义范式中执行一个联合拾取和放置任务,该范式能够展示不同程度的合作。参与者将一个木杯从桌子的一端移动到另一端,其中一个参与者将杯子移动到中间位置,然后其伙伴再将杯子从中间位置移动到目标位置。通过三维运动跟踪记录手部和手指的动作,以评估参与者的合作行为。在执行联合行动任务之前,参与者被归类为属于同一组或不同组,假定这是基于对他们认知加工方式的评估。结果表明,拿起杯子时参与者手指的方向受杯子在目标位置所需角度的影响。当将杯子放置在中间位置时,大多数参与者会根据联合行动目标调整杯子把手的旋转方向,从而便于伙伴后续的动作。男性参与者只有在与同组伙伴一起执行任务时才表现出这种合作行为,而女性参与者无论社会分类如何都会表现出合作行为。这些结果表明,在合作性联合行动中,参与者倾向于考虑伙伴最终状态的舒适度,并将其纳入自己的动作规划中。然而,像群体成员身份这样的社会因素可能会调节这种倾向。

相似文献

1
Social categorization and cooperation in motor joint action: evidence for a joint end-state comfort.运动联合动作中的社会分类与合作:联合终态舒适度的证据
Exp Brain Res. 2015 Aug;233(8):2323-34. doi: 10.1007/s00221-015-4301-1. Epub 2015 May 12.
2
End in view: Joint end-state comfort depends on gaze and extraversion.目标:联合末端舒适状态取决于注视和外向性。
Hum Mov Sci. 2021 Dec;80:102867. doi: 10.1016/j.humov.2021.102867. Epub 2021 Sep 4.
3
The roles of action selection and actor selection in joint task settings.在联合任务设置中,动作选择和执行者选择的作用。
Cognition. 2019 Jan;182:184-192. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2018.10.010. Epub 2018 Oct 16.
4
Action-effect sharing induces task-set sharing in joint task switching.动作-效应共享在联合任务切换中会引发任务集共享。
Cognition. 2017 Aug;165:113-120. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2017.05.022. Epub 2017 May 20.
5
Index of difficulty and side of space are accommodated during the selection and planning of a joint action.在联合行动的选择和规划过程中,会考虑难度指数和空间方位。
Hum Mov Sci. 2017 Aug;54:197-209. doi: 10.1016/j.humov.2017.05.009. Epub 2017 May 17.
6
Autistic traits affect interpersonal motor coordination by modulating strategic use of role-based behavior.自闭症特质通过调节基于角色行为的策略性使用来影响人际运动协调。
Mol Autism. 2017 Jun 9;8:23. doi: 10.1186/s13229-017-0141-0. eCollection 2017.
7
Group membership and social status modulate joint actions.
Exp Brain Res. 2015 Aug;233(8):2461-6. doi: 10.1007/s00221-015-4316-7. Epub 2015 May 24.
8
Attention allocation and task representation during joint action planning.联合行动规划中的注意力分配与任务表征
J Cogn Neurosci. 2014 Oct;26(10):2275-86. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_00634. Epub 2014 Apr 4.
9
For your eyes only: effect of confederate's eye level on reach-to-grasp action.仅供参考:同伙的眼高对视动抓取行为的影响。
Front Psychol. 2014 Dec 4;5:1407. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01407. eCollection 2014.
10
Co-actors represent each other's task regularity through social statistical learning.共同行动者通过社会统计学习来呈现彼此的任务规律。
Cognition. 2023 Jun;235:105411. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2023.105411. Epub 2023 Feb 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Enhancement of joint flanker effect in intergroup competition.群体间竞争中联合侧翼效应的增强。
Psych J. 2025 Feb;14(1):94-102. doi: 10.1002/pchj.796. Epub 2024 Aug 21.
2
Grip selection without tool knowledge: end-state comfort effect in familiar and novel tool use.无工具知识的握持选择:熟悉和新颖工具使用中的末端状态舒适效应。
Exp Brain Res. 2023 Aug;241(8):1989-2000. doi: 10.1007/s00221-023-06655-0. Epub 2023 Jun 29.
3
Grip-force modulation in human-to-human object handovers: effects of sensory and kinematic manipulations.

本文引用的文献

1
Strategic communication and behavioral coupling in asymmetric joint action.非对称联合行动中的战略沟通与行为耦合
Exp Brain Res. 2014 Sep;232(9):2945-56. doi: 10.1007/s00221-014-3982-1. Epub 2014 May 18.
2
Human sensorimotor communication: a theory of signaling in online social interactions.人类感觉运动沟通:在线社交互动中的信号理论。
PLoS One. 2013 Nov 20;8(11):e79876. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0079876. eCollection 2013.
3
Group membership affects spontaneous mental representation: failure to represent the out-group in a joint action task.
人体间物体交接中的握力调节:感觉和运动学操作的影响。
Sci Rep. 2020 Dec 24;10(1):22381. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-79129-w.
4
Rationality in Joint Action: Maximizing Coefficiency in Coordination.联合行动中的理性:协调中效率的最大化。
Psychol Sci. 2019 Jun;30(6):930-941. doi: 10.1177/0956797619842550. Epub 2019 May 14.
5
Multiple Frames of Reference Are Used During the Selection and Planning of a Sequential Joint Action.在连续联合行动的选择和规划过程中会使用多个参考框架。
Front Psychol. 2018 May 1;9:542. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00542. eCollection 2018.
6
Brains in Competition: Improved Cognitive Performance and Inter-Brain Coupling by Hyperscanning Paradigm with Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy.相互竞争的大脑:通过功能近红外光谱超扫描范式提高认知表现和脑间耦合
Front Behav Neurosci. 2017 Aug 31;11:163. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2017.00163. eCollection 2017.
7
How You Move Is What I See: Planning an Action Biases a Partner's Visual Search.你如何移动就是我所看到的:规划一个动作会使伙伴的视觉搜索产生偏差。
Front Psychol. 2017 Feb 7;8:77. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00077. eCollection 2017.
8
Competition in the Brain. The Contribution of EEG and fNIRS Modulation and Personality Effects in Social Ranking.大脑中的竞争。脑电图(EEG)和功能性近红外光谱(fNIRS)调制以及社会排名中人格效应的作用。
Front Psychol. 2016 Oct 13;7:1587. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01587. eCollection 2016.
群体成员身份会影响自发的心理表征:在联合行动任务中无法表征外群体。
PLoS One. 2013 Nov 20;8(11):e79178. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0079178. eCollection 2013.
4
Vicarious motor activation during action perception: beyond correlational evidence.动作感知过程中的替代运动激活:超越相关证据。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2013 May 14;7:185. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00185. eCollection 2013.
5
Kinematics fingerprints of leader and follower role-taking during cooperative joint actions.领导者和追随者在合作联合动作中角色转换的运动学特征。
Exp Brain Res. 2013 May;226(4):473-86. doi: 10.1007/s00221-013-3459-7. Epub 2013 Mar 17.
6
Higher-order action planning for individual and joint object manipulations.个体和联合物体操纵的高阶动作规划。
Exp Brain Res. 2013 Apr;225(4):579-88. doi: 10.1007/s00221-012-3398-8. Epub 2013 Jan 30.
7
Pouring or chilling a bottle of wine: an fMRI study on the prospective planning of object-directed actions.倒酒或冰镇一瓶酒:一项关于物体定向动作前瞻性计划的 fMRI 研究。
Exp Brain Res. 2012 Apr;218(2):189-200. doi: 10.1007/s00221-012-3016-9. Epub 2012 Feb 18.
8
Response selection during a joint action task.联合行动任务中的反应选择。
J Mot Behav. 2011;43(4):329-32. doi: 10.1080/00222895.2011.592871.
9
The joint flanker effect: sharing tasks with real and imagined co-actors.共同动作突显性:与真实和想象中的共同执行者共同完成任务。
Exp Brain Res. 2011 Jun;211(3-4):371-85. doi: 10.1007/s00221-011-2709-9. Epub 2011 May 15.
10
Etiquette and effort: holding doors for others.礼仪与努力:为他人扶门。
Psychol Sci. 2011 May;22(5):584-8. doi: 10.1177/0956797611406444. Epub 2011 Apr 22.