Suppr超能文献

用于花生过敏的肾上腺素自动注射器的经济学评估。

Economic evaluation of epinephrine auto-injectors for peanut allergy.

作者信息

Shaker Marcus, Bean Katherine, Verdi Marylee

机构信息

Geisel School of Medicine, Hanover, New Hampshire; Children's Hospital at Dartmouth and Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, New Hampshire.

Geisel School of Medicine, Hanover, New Hampshire.

出版信息

Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2017 Aug;119(2):160-163. doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2017.05.020. Epub 2017 Jun 19.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Three commercial epinephrine auto-injectors were available in the United States in the summer of 2016: EpiPen, Adrenaclick, and epinephrine injection, USP auto-injector.

OBJECTIVE

To describe the variation in pharmacy costs among epinephrine auto-injector devices in New England and evaluate the additional expense associated with incremental auto-injector costs.

METHODS

Decision analysis software was used to evaluate costs of the most and least expensive epinephrine auto-injector devices for children with peanut allergy. To evaluate regional variation in epinephrine auto-injector costs, a random sample of New England national and corporate pharmacies was compared with a convenience sample of pharmacies from 10 Canadian provinces.

RESULTS

Assuming prescriptions written for 2 double epinephrine packs each year (home and school), the mean costs of food allergy over the 20-year model horizon totaled $58,667 (95% confidence interval [CI] $57,745-$59,588) when EpiPen was prescribed and $45,588 (95% CI $44,873-$46,304) when epinephrine injection, USP auto-injector was prescribed. No effectiveness differences were evident between groups, with 17.19 (95% CI 17.11-17.27) quality-adjusted life years accruing for each subject. The incremental cost per episode of anaphylaxis treated with epinephrine over the model horizon was $12,576 for EpiPen vs epinephrine injection, USP auto-injector. EpiPen costs were lowest at Canadian pharmacies ($96, 95% CI $85-$107). There was price consistency between corporate and independent pharmacies throughout New England by device brand, with the epinephrine injection, USP auto-injector being the most affordable device.

CONCLUSION

Cost differences among epinephrine auto-injectors were significant. More expensive auto-injector brands did not appear to provide incremental benefit.

摘要

背景

2016年夏天,美国有三种市售肾上腺素自动注射器:EpiPen、Adrenaclick和肾上腺素注射液USP自动注射器。

目的

描述新英格兰地区肾上腺素自动注射器的药房成本差异,并评估自动注射器成本增加带来的额外费用。

方法

使用决策分析软件评估花生过敏儿童使用的最昂贵和最便宜的肾上腺素自动注射器的成本。为了评估肾上腺素自动注射器成本的地区差异,将新英格兰地区国家和企业药房的随机样本与来自加拿大10个省份的药房便利样本进行了比较。

结果

假设每年开具2个双份肾上腺素包装的处方(家庭和学校),在20年的模型期内,开具EpiPen时食物过敏的平均成本总计58,667美元(95%置信区间[CI]57,745 - 59,588美元),开具肾上腺素注射液USP自动注射器时为45,588美元(95%CI 44,873 - 46,304美元)。两组之间没有明显的有效性差异,每个受试者获得17.19(95%CI 17.11 - 17.27)个质量调整生命年。在模型期内,使用EpiPen治疗过敏反应每例的增量成本比使用肾上腺素注射液USP自动注射器高12,576美元。EpiPen在加拿大药房的成本最低(96美元,95%CI 85 - 107美元)。新英格兰地区的企业药房和独立药房在设备品牌方面价格一致,肾上腺素注射液USP自动注射器是最实惠的设备。

结论

肾上腺素自动注射器之间的成本差异很大。更昂贵的自动注射器品牌似乎没有带来额外的益处。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验