Suppr超能文献

COVID-19 大流行期间高健康素养患者的家庭过敏原免疫治疗的健康和经济结果:特殊时期的成本效益分析。

Health and Economic Outcomes of Home Maintenance Allergen Immunotherapy in Select Patients with High Health Literacy during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis During Exceptional Times.

机构信息

Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Section of Allergy and Immunology, Lebanon, NH, and Dartmouth Geisel School of Medicine, Hanover, NH.

Division of Pulmonary, Allergy and Critical Care, Department of Medicine, NorthShore University HealthSystem, Evanston, Ill.

出版信息

J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2020 Jul-Aug;8(7):2310-2321.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2020.05.007. Epub 2020 May 14.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Allergen immunotherapy (AIT) is safe and effective but is typically administered under strict clinic observation to mitigate the risk of a systemic reaction to immunotherapy (SRIT). However, in the setting of the global coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic, alternative care models should be explored.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of home immunotherapy self-administration (HITSA) in a highly idealized circumstance for provision of maintenance AIT in a shelter-in-place or other scenarios of unforeseen reduction in nonessential medical services.

METHODS

Markov modeling was used to compare in-office clinic AIT in selected patients using cohort analysis and microsimulation from the societal and health care perspectives.

RESULTS

Assuming similar SRIT rates, HITSA was found to be a cost-effective option with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $44,554/quality-adjusted life-year when considering both incremental epinephrine autoinjector costs and coronavirus disease 2019 risks. Excluding epinephrine autoinjector costs, HISTA dominated other options. However, outside of pandemic considerations, HITSA was not cost-effective (incremental cost-effectiveness ratio, $198,877,286) at annual epinephrine autoinjector costs above $287. As the incremental HITSA SRIT rate increased above 15%, clinic AIT was the most cost-effective strategy. Excluding both pandemic risks and risk of motor vehicle accident fatality from round-trip clinic transit, clinic AIT dominated other strategies. Clinic AIT was the more cost-effective option at very high fatality relative risk for HITSA or at very low annual risk of contracting coronavirus disease 2019.

CONCLUSIONS

Under idealized assumptions HITSA can be a safe and cost-effective option during a global pandemic in appropriately selected patients provided home rates of SRIT remain stable.

摘要

背景

变应原免疫疗法(AIT)安全有效,但通常在严格的临床观察下进行,以降低免疫疗法全身性反应(SRIT)的风险。然而,在全球 2019 年冠状病毒病大流行的背景下,应该探索替代护理模式。

目的

评估在提供维持性 AIT 的高度理想化环境中,家庭免疫疗法自我管理(HITSA)的成本效益,即在避难所或其他不可预见的减少非必要医疗服务的情况下。

方法

使用马尔可夫模型,从社会和医疗保健的角度,通过队列分析和微观模拟,比较选定患者的门诊诊所 AIT。

结果

假设相似的 SRIT 率,当同时考虑到肾上腺素自动注射器成本和 2019 年冠状病毒病风险时,HITSA 被发现是一种具有成本效益的选择,增量成本效益比为每增加一个质量调整生命年 44554 美元。不包括肾上腺素自动注射器成本,HITSA 占主导地位。然而,在大流行考虑之外,当每年的肾上腺素自动注射器成本超过 287 美元时,HITSA 不具有成本效益(增量成本效益比为 198877286 美元)。随着 HITSA 增量 SRIT 率超过 15%,门诊 AIT 是最具成本效益的策略。不包括往返诊所交通的大流行风险和机动车事故死亡率风险,门诊 AIT 占主导地位。在 HITSA 或 2019 年冠状病毒病的年发病率非常高的情况下,门诊 AIT 是更具成本效益的选择。

结论

在理想的假设下,在适当选择的患者中,HITSA 可以成为全球大流行期间安全且具有成本效益的选择,前提是家庭 SRIT 率保持稳定。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6144/7224677/58f5b6f0d2b8/gr1_lrg.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验