• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

药物靶向线粒体功能辅助 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死再灌注的临床获益:随机临床试验的荟萃分析。

Clinical benefit of drugs targeting mitochondrial function as an adjunct to reperfusion in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: A meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.

机构信息

Cardiology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Ferrara, Cona, FE, Italy.

Cardiology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Ferrara, Cona, FE, Italy.

出版信息

Int J Cardiol. 2017 Oct 1;244:59-66. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2017.06.040. Epub 2017 Jun 13.

DOI:10.1016/j.ijcard.2017.06.040
PMID:28634037
Abstract

AIMS

To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials (RCT) comparing the effectiveness of drugs targeting mitochondrial function vs. placebo in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) undergoing mechanical coronary reperfusion.

METHODS

Inclusion criteria: RCTs enrolling STEMI patients treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and comparing drugs targeting mitochondrial function vs. placebo. Odds ratios (OR) were computed from individual studies and pooled with random-effect meta-analysis.

RESULTS

Fifteen studies were identified involving 5680 patients. When compared with placebo, drugs targeting mitochondrial component/pathway were not associated with significant reduction of cardiovascular and all-cause mortality (OR 0.9, 95% CI 0.7-1.17 and OR 0.92, 95% CI 0.69-1.23, respectively). However, these agents significantly reduced hospital admission for heart failure (HF) (OR 0.64; 95% CI 0.45-0.92) and increased left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) (OR 1.44; 95% CI 1.15-1.82). After analysis for subgroups according to the mechanism of action, drugs with direct/selective action did not reduce any outcome. Conversely, those with indirect/unspecific action showed a significant effect on cardiovascular mortality (0.65, 95% CI 0.46-0.92), all-cause mortality (OR 0.69, 95% CI 0.52-0.92), hospital readmission for HF (OR 0.41, 95% CI 0.28-0.6) and LVEF (OR 1.49, 95% CI 1.09-2.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Administration of drugs targeting mitochondrial function in STEMI patients undergoing primary PCI appear to have no effect on mortality, but may reduce hospital readmission for HF. The drugs with a broad-spectrum mechanism of action seem to be more effective in reducing adverse events.

摘要

目的

系统评价和荟萃分析比较针对线粒体功能的药物与安慰剂在接受机械性冠状动脉再灌注的 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)患者中的疗效。

方法

纳入标准:纳入接受直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)治疗的 STEMI 患者,并比较针对线粒体功能的药物与安慰剂的随机对照试验(RCT)。采用随机效应荟萃分析计算个体研究的比值比(OR)。

结果

共纳入 15 项研究,涉及 5680 例患者。与安慰剂相比,针对线粒体成分/途径的药物与心血管和全因死亡率的降低无关(OR 0.9,95%CI 0.7-1.17 和 OR 0.92,95%CI 0.69-1.23)。然而,这些药物显著降低了心力衰竭(HF)的住院率(OR 0.64;95%CI 0.45-0.92)并增加了左心室射血分数(LVEF)(OR 1.44;95%CI 1.15-1.82)。根据作用机制进行亚组分析后,具有直接/选择性作用的药物并未降低任何结果。相反,具有间接/非特异性作用的药物对心血管死亡率(0.65,95%CI 0.46-0.92)、全因死亡率(OR 0.69,95%CI 0.52-0.92)、HF 再住院率(OR 0.41,95%CI 0.28-0.6)和 LVEF(OR 1.49,95%CI 1.09-2.05)有显著影响。

结论

在接受直接 PCI 的 STEMI 患者中,针对线粒体功能的药物治疗似乎对死亡率没有影响,但可能降低 HF 的住院再入院率。作用机制广泛的药物似乎更能有效减少不良事件。

相似文献

1
Clinical benefit of drugs targeting mitochondrial function as an adjunct to reperfusion in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: A meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.药物靶向线粒体功能辅助 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死再灌注的临床获益:随机临床试验的荟萃分析。
Int J Cardiol. 2017 Oct 1;244:59-66. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2017.06.040. Epub 2017 Jun 13.
2
Beta-blockers in patients without heart failure after myocardial infarction.心肌梗死后无心力衰竭的患者使用β受体阻滞剂。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Nov 5;11(11):CD012565. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012565.pub2.
3
Drugs for preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting in adults after general anaesthesia: a network meta-analysis.成人全身麻醉后预防术后恶心呕吐的药物:网状Meta分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Oct 19;10(10):CD012859. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012859.pub2.
4
Drug-eluting stents versus bare-metal stents for acute coronary syndrome.药物洗脱支架与裸金属支架治疗急性冠状动脉综合征的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Aug 23;8(8):CD012481. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012481.pub2.
5
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.系统性药理学治疗慢性斑块状银屑病:网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 19;4(4):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub4.
6
Complete versus culprit-only revascularisation in ST elevation myocardial infarction with multi-vessel disease.ST段抬高型心肌梗死合并多支血管病变时完全血运重建与仅罪犯血管血运重建的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 May 3;5(5):CD011986. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011986.pub2.
7
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.慢性斑块状银屑病的全身药理学治疗:一项网状荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Dec 22;12(12):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub2.
8
Intravenous magnesium sulphate and sotalol for prevention of atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass surgery: a systematic review and economic evaluation.静脉注射硫酸镁和索他洛尔预防冠状动脉搭桥术后房颤:系统评价与经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2008 Jun;12(28):iii-iv, ix-95. doi: 10.3310/hta12280.
9
Comparative efficacy and safety of reperfusion therapy with fibrinolytic agents in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.溶栓药物再灌注治疗 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者的疗效和安全性比较:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
Lancet. 2017 Aug 19;390(10096):747-759. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)31441-1.
10
Inhaled magnesium sulfate in the treatment of acute asthma.吸入硫酸镁治疗急性哮喘。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Nov 28;11(11):CD003898. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003898.pub6.

引用本文的文献

1
Modulation of mitochondrial permeability transition pores in reperfusion injury: Mechanisms and therapeutic approaches.再灌注损伤中线粒体通透性转换孔的调节:机制与治疗方法。
Eur J Clin Invest. 2025 Jan;55(1):e14331. doi: 10.1111/eci.14331. Epub 2024 Oct 10.
2
Calcium signaling from sarcoplasmic reticulum and mitochondria contact sites in acute myocardial infarction.肌浆网和线粒体接触部位在急性心肌梗死中的钙信号转导。
J Transl Med. 2024 Jun 9;22(1):552. doi: 10.1186/s12967-024-05240-5.
3
Editorial: Mitochondrial remodeling and dynamic inter-organellar contacts in cardiovascular physiopathology-Volume II.
社论:心血管生理病理学中的线粒体重塑与细胞器间动态接触——第二卷
Front Cell Dev Biol. 2023 Jun 22;11:1240207. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2023.1240207. eCollection 2023.
4
Comprehensive Analysis of Mitochondrial Dynamics Alterations in Heart Diseases.心脏疾病中线粒体动力学改变的综合分析。
Int J Mol Sci. 2023 Feb 8;24(4):3414. doi: 10.3390/ijms24043414.
5
Emodin Regulates lncRNA XIST/miR-217 Axis to Protect Myocardial Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury.大黄素通过调节 lncRNA XIST/miR-217 轴来保护心肌缺血再灌注损伤。
Oxid Med Cell Longev. 2023 Jan 31;2023:3612814. doi: 10.1155/2023/3612814. eCollection 2023.
6
Cardio protective effect of nicorandil in reperfusion injury among patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention.尼可地尔对接受直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者再灌注损伤的心脏保护作用。
Pak J Med Sci. 2023 Jan-Feb;39(1):177-181. doi: 10.12669/pjms.39.1.6034.
7
Some Insights into the Regulation of Cardiac Physiology and Pathology by the Hippo Pathway.对Hippo信号通路调控心脏生理与病理的一些见解
Biomedicines. 2022 Mar 21;10(3):726. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines10030726.
8
Similarities between fibroblasts and cardiomyocytes in the study of the permeability transition pore.成纤维细胞与心肌细胞在通透性转换孔研究中的相似性
Eur J Clin Invest. 2022 Jul;52(7):e13764. doi: 10.1111/eci.13764. Epub 2022 Mar 15.
9
Effects of mechanical circulatory support devices in patients with acute myocardial infarction undergoing stent implantation: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.机械循环支持装置在急性心肌梗死患者支架植入术中的作用:随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMJ Open. 2021 Jun 29;11(6):e044072. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-044072.
10
The impact of oral nicorandil pre-treatment on ST resolution and clinical outcome of patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary coronary angioplasty: A randomized placebo controlled trial.口服尼可地尔预处理对接受直接冠状动脉血管成形术的急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者ST段回落及临床结局的影响:一项随机安慰剂对照试验。
J Cardiovasc Thorac Res. 2020;12(2):90-96. doi: 10.34172/jcvtr.2020.16. Epub 2020 May 8.