Cardiology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Ferrara, Cona, FE, Italy.
Cardiology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Ferrara, Cona, FE, Italy.
Int J Cardiol. 2017 Oct 1;244:59-66. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2017.06.040. Epub 2017 Jun 13.
To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials (RCT) comparing the effectiveness of drugs targeting mitochondrial function vs. placebo in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) undergoing mechanical coronary reperfusion.
Inclusion criteria: RCTs enrolling STEMI patients treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and comparing drugs targeting mitochondrial function vs. placebo. Odds ratios (OR) were computed from individual studies and pooled with random-effect meta-analysis.
Fifteen studies were identified involving 5680 patients. When compared with placebo, drugs targeting mitochondrial component/pathway were not associated with significant reduction of cardiovascular and all-cause mortality (OR 0.9, 95% CI 0.7-1.17 and OR 0.92, 95% CI 0.69-1.23, respectively). However, these agents significantly reduced hospital admission for heart failure (HF) (OR 0.64; 95% CI 0.45-0.92) and increased left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) (OR 1.44; 95% CI 1.15-1.82). After analysis for subgroups according to the mechanism of action, drugs with direct/selective action did not reduce any outcome. Conversely, those with indirect/unspecific action showed a significant effect on cardiovascular mortality (0.65, 95% CI 0.46-0.92), all-cause mortality (OR 0.69, 95% CI 0.52-0.92), hospital readmission for HF (OR 0.41, 95% CI 0.28-0.6) and LVEF (OR 1.49, 95% CI 1.09-2.05).
Administration of drugs targeting mitochondrial function in STEMI patients undergoing primary PCI appear to have no effect on mortality, but may reduce hospital readmission for HF. The drugs with a broad-spectrum mechanism of action seem to be more effective in reducing adverse events.
系统评价和荟萃分析比较针对线粒体功能的药物与安慰剂在接受机械性冠状动脉再灌注的 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)患者中的疗效。
纳入标准:纳入接受直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)治疗的 STEMI 患者,并比较针对线粒体功能的药物与安慰剂的随机对照试验(RCT)。采用随机效应荟萃分析计算个体研究的比值比(OR)。
共纳入 15 项研究,涉及 5680 例患者。与安慰剂相比,针对线粒体成分/途径的药物与心血管和全因死亡率的降低无关(OR 0.9,95%CI 0.7-1.17 和 OR 0.92,95%CI 0.69-1.23)。然而,这些药物显著降低了心力衰竭(HF)的住院率(OR 0.64;95%CI 0.45-0.92)并增加了左心室射血分数(LVEF)(OR 1.44;95%CI 1.15-1.82)。根据作用机制进行亚组分析后,具有直接/选择性作用的药物并未降低任何结果。相反,具有间接/非特异性作用的药物对心血管死亡率(0.65,95%CI 0.46-0.92)、全因死亡率(OR 0.69,95%CI 0.52-0.92)、HF 再住院率(OR 0.41,95%CI 0.28-0.6)和 LVEF(OR 1.49,95%CI 1.09-2.05)有显著影响。
在接受直接 PCI 的 STEMI 患者中,针对线粒体功能的药物治疗似乎对死亡率没有影响,但可能降低 HF 的住院再入院率。作用机制广泛的药物似乎更能有效减少不良事件。