• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估创伤后应激障碍结局的最小临床重要差异(MCID)。

Minimal Clinically Important Differences (MCID) in Assessing Outcomes of Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder.

机构信息

VA New England Mental Illness Research and Education Center, VA Connecticut Healthcare System (116A-4), 950 Campbell Avenue, Building 36, West Haven, CT, 06516, USA.

Department of Psychiatry, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.

出版信息

Psychiatr Q. 2018 Mar;89(1):141-155. doi: 10.1007/s11126-017-9522-y.

DOI:10.1007/s11126-017-9522-y
PMID:28634644
Abstract

This study sought to determine the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for two frequently used measures of symptom severity in Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder: the Clinician Administered PTSD Scale (CAPS) and the PTSD Symptom Checklist (PCL). Data from a randomized clinical trial of antipsychotic medication in military-related treatment-resistant PTSD (N= 267) included assessments 4 times over 26 weeks. Methods for estimating the MCID were based on both the anchor-based approach, using the Clinical Global Impressions (CGI) severity and improvement scales, rated by both clinicians and patients; and the distribution-based approach (based on standardized z-scores). Severity and change scores on the CAPS and PCL were converted to z-scores and compared across CGI levels using analysis of variance. The average difference in CAPS z-scores between each of three CGI levels between "moderate" to "severe" and from "no change" to "much improved" was 0.758 for clinician CGI ratings and 0.525 for patient CGI ratings and were similar for the PCL (0.483 and 0.471) with all differences significant at p<.0001). Clinically meaningful CAPS and PCL severity and change z-scores range between 0.5-0.8 standard deviations. The MCID estimates suggested here provide an empirical basis for determining whether statistically significant changes in CAPS and PCL scores are clinically meaningful.

摘要

本研究旨在确定创伤后应激障碍两种常用症状严重程度评估工具的最小临床差异(MCID):临床医生管理 PTSD 量表(CAPS)和 PTSD 症状清单(PCL)。这项针对与军事相关的、治疗抵抗性 PTSD 的抗精神病药物的随机临床试验(N=267)的数据包括 26 周内的 4 次评估。MCID 的估计方法基于锚定方法,使用临床总体印象(CGI)严重程度和改善量表,由临床医生和患者进行评定;以及分布方法(基于标准化 z 分数)。CAPS 和 PCL 的严重程度和变化分数转换为 z 分数,并使用方差分析比较 CGI 水平。在 CAPS 中,与“中度”到“重度”相比,从“无变化”到“明显改善”,临床医生 CGI 评定的 z 分数平均差异为 0.758,患者 CGI 评定的 z 分数平均差异为 0.525,PCL 的差异也相似(0.483 和 0.471),所有差异均在 p<.0001 时有统计学意义。有意义的 CAPS 和 PCL 严重程度和变化 z 分数范围在 0.5-0.8 个标准差之间。这里提出的 MCID 估计值为确定 CAPS 和 PCL 评分的统计学显著变化是否具有临床意义提供了实证基础。

相似文献

1
Minimal Clinically Important Differences (MCID) in Assessing Outcomes of Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder.评估创伤后应激障碍结局的最小临床重要差异(MCID)。
Psychiatr Q. 2018 Mar;89(1):141-155. doi: 10.1007/s11126-017-9522-y.
2
Correlates of Nonimprovement to Pharmacotherapy for Chronic, Antidepressant-Resistant, Military Service-Related Posttraumatic Stress Disorder: Insights From the Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study No. 504.慢性、抗抑郁药难治性、与军事服役相关的创伤后应激障碍药物治疗无改善的相关因素:来自退伍军人事务部合作研究第504号的见解
J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2017 Dec;37(6):717-721. doi: 10.1097/JCP.0000000000000777.
3
Adjunctive risperidone treatment for antidepressant-resistant symptoms of chronic military service-related PTSD: a randomized trial.抗抑郁药抵抗的慢性军人性创伤后应激障碍症状的辅助利培酮治疗:一项随机试验。
JAMA. 2011 Aug 3;306(5):493-502. doi: 10.1001/jama.2011.1080.
4
Trial of Prazosin for Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder in Military Veterans.军人创伤后应激障碍的普萘洛尔试验。
N Engl J Med. 2018 Feb 8;378(6):507-517. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1507598.
5
Characterizing the Effects of Quetiapine in Military Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder.喹硫平对军事创伤后应激障碍的影响特征分析。
Psychopharmacol Bull. 2018 Feb 5;48(2):8-17.
6
Efficacy of Quetiapine Monotherapy in Posttraumatic Stress Disorder: A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial.喹硫平单药治疗创伤后应激障碍的疗效:一项随机、安慰剂对照试验。
Am J Psychiatry. 2016 Dec 1;173(12):1205-1212. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2016.15070967. Epub 2016 Jul 15.
7
An open-label assessment of aripiprazole in the treatment of PTSD.阿立哌唑治疗创伤后应激障碍的开放标签评估。
Psychopharmacol Bull. 2009;42(1):69-80.
8
Quetiapine treatment in an open trial in combat-related post-traumatic stress disorder with psychotic features.喹硫平治疗伴有精神病性特征的与战斗相关的创伤后应激障碍的开放性试验。
Int J Neuropsychopharmacol. 2007 Apr;10(2):253-61. doi: 10.1017/S1461145706006596. Epub 2006 Apr 6.
9
Prospective study to evaluate the efficacy of aripiprazole as a monotherapy in patients with severe chronic posttraumatic stress disorder: an open trial.评估阿立哌唑作为单一疗法治疗重度慢性创伤后应激障碍患者疗效的前瞻性研究:一项开放性试验。
Psychopharmacol Bull. 2007;40(2):6-18.
10
Concordance in PTSD symptom change between DSM-5 versions of the Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale (CAPS-5) and PTSD Checklist (PCL-5).DSM-5 版临床医生管理创伤后应激障碍量表 (CAPS-5) 和创伤后应激障碍检查表 (PCL-5) 在 PTSD 症状变化方面的一致性。
Psychol Assess. 2022 Jun;34(6):604-609. doi: 10.1037/pas0001130. Epub 2022 Apr 7.

引用本文的文献

1
Enhanced cognitive control following neurofeedback therapy in chronic treatment-resistant PTSD among refugees: a feasibility study.难民中慢性难治性创伤后应激障碍患者经神经反馈治疗后认知控制能力增强:一项可行性研究
Front Psychiatry. 2025 Aug 15;16:1567809. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1567809. eCollection 2025.
2
Severe PTSD or just PTSD?重度创伤后应激障碍还是单纯的创伤后应激障碍?
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2025 Dec;16(1):2512671. doi: 10.1080/20008066.2025.2512671. Epub 2025 Jun 19.
3
The efficacy of elevating anandamide via inhibition of fatty acid amide hydrolase (FAAH) combined with internet-delivered cognitive behavioral therapy in the treatment of post-traumatic stress disorder: a randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial.

本文引用的文献

1
Probable Posttraumatic Stress Disorder in the US Veteran Population According to DSM-5: Results From the National Health and Resilience in Veterans Study.根据 DSM-5 标准,美国退伍军人人群中创伤后应激障碍的可能性:来自国家健康和退伍军人适应力研究的结果。
J Clin Psychiatry. 2016 Nov;77(11):1503-1510. doi: 10.4088/JCP.15m10188.
2
Obtaining employment as an anchor for estimating the minimum clinically important difference on the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) in schizophrenia.作为一名主播获得就业机会,用于评估精神分裂症阳性与阴性症状量表(PANSS)的最小临床重要差异。
Psychiatry Res. 2016 Apr 30;238:304-309. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2016.02.018. Epub 2016 Feb 13.
3
通过抑制脂肪酸酰胺水解酶(FAAH)提高花生四烯酸乙醇胺水平并联合网络认知行为疗法治疗创伤后应激障碍的疗效:一项随机、安慰剂对照临床试验。
Neuropsychopharmacology. 2025 May 17. doi: 10.1038/s41386-025-02128-w.
4
The minimal important difference in obsessive-compulsive disorder: An analysis of double-blind SSRI trials in adults.强迫症的最小重要差异:成人双盲 SSRI 试验分析。
Eur Psychiatry. 2024 Sep 20;67(1):e53. doi: 10.1192/j.eurpsy.2024.1768.
5
Systematic review and meta-analysis of neurofeedback and its effect on posttraumatic stress disorder.神经反馈及其对创伤后应激障碍影响的系统评价与荟萃分析。
Front Psychiatry. 2024 Mar 21;15:1323485. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1323485. eCollection 2024.
6
Safety and Efficacy of Pulmonary Rehabilitation for Long COVID Patients Experiencing Long-Lasting Symptoms.长新冠患者持久症状的肺康复治疗的安全性和疗效。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024 Feb 19;21(2):242. doi: 10.3390/ijerph21020242.
7
Minimal important difference metrics and test-retest reliability of the PTSD Checklist for DSM-5 with a primary care sample.创伤后应激障碍检查表 DSM-5 用于初级保健样本的最小重要差异指标和测试-重测信度。
J Trauma Stress. 2023 Dec;36(6):1102-1114. doi: 10.1002/jts.22975. Epub 2023 Oct 16.
8
Reconsolidation of traumatic memories protocol compared to trauma-focussed cognitive behaviour therapy for post-traumatic stress disorder in UK military veterans: a randomised controlled feasibility trial.与创伤聚焦认知行为疗法相比,创伤记忆再巩固方案治疗英国退伍军人创伤后应激障碍的随机对照可行性试验。
Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2023 Oct 13;9(1):175. doi: 10.1186/s40814-023-01396-x.
9
Psychosocial interventions for survivors of rape and sexual assault experienced during adulthood.成年期经历强奸和性侵犯的幸存者的心理社会干预。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Oct 5;10(10):CD013456. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013456.pub2.
10
A randomised pilot feasibility study of eye movement desensitisation and reprocessing recent traumatic episode protocol, to improve psychological recovery following intensive care admission for COVID-19.一项关于眼动脱敏与再处理近期创伤事件方案的随机试点可行性研究,以改善因新冠肺炎入住重症监护病房后的心理恢复情况。
J Intensive Care Soc. 2023 Aug;24(3):309-319. doi: 10.1177/17511437221136828. Epub 2022 Nov 19.
Psychotherapy for Military-Related PTSD: A Review of Randomized Clinical Trials.
军事相关 PTSD 的心理治疗:随机临床试验综述。
JAMA. 2015 Aug 4;314(5):489-500. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.8370.
4
Course of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder 40 Years After the Vietnam War: Findings From the National Vietnam Veterans Longitudinal Study.越南战争后 40 年创伤后应激障碍的病程:来自全国越南退伍军人纵向研究的结果。
JAMA Psychiatry. 2015 Sep;72(9):875-81. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2015.0803.
5
Longitudinal relationships of insomnia, nightmares, and PTSD severity in recent combat veterans.近期参战老兵中失眠、噩梦和 PTSD 严重程度的纵向关系。
J Psychosom Res. 2013 Dec;75(6):546-50. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2013.09.004. Epub 2013 Oct 2.
6
Understanding heterogeneity in PTSD: fear, dysphoria, and distress.理解 PTSD 的异质性:恐惧、心境恶劣和痛苦。
Depress Anxiety. 2014 Feb;31(2):97-106. doi: 10.1002/da.22133. Epub 2013 Jun 12.
7
Minimum clinically important difference in the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale with data from the Clinical Antipsychotic Trials of Intervention Effectiveness (CATIE).阳性与阴性症状量表的最小临床重要差异:来自干预有效性的临床抗精神病药物试验(CATIE)的数据。
J Clin Psychiatry. 2012 Apr;73(4):526-32. doi: 10.4088/JCP.11m07162.
8
Recent trends in the treatment of posttraumatic stress disorder and other mental disorders in the VHA.VA 中创伤后应激障碍和其他精神障碍治疗的最新趋势。
Psychiatr Serv. 2012;63(5):471-6. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201100432.
9
Posttraumatic stress symptoms and health-related quality of life: a two year follow up study of injury treated at the emergency department.创伤后应激症状与健康相关的生活质量:急诊科治疗的损伤两年随访研究。
BMC Psychiatry. 2012 Jan 9;12:1. doi: 10.1186/1471-244X-12-1.
10
Adjunctive risperidone treatment for antidepressant-resistant symptoms of chronic military service-related PTSD: a randomized trial.抗抑郁药抵抗的慢性军人性创伤后应激障碍症状的辅助利培酮治疗:一项随机试验。
JAMA. 2011 Aug 3;306(5):493-502. doi: 10.1001/jama.2011.1080.