• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

利益相关者对使用毒物来管理野猪的看法。

Stakeholder perspectives towards the use of toxicants for managing wild pigs.

机构信息

School of Forestry and Wildlife Sciences, Auburn University, Auburn, Alabama, United States of America.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2021 Feb 5;16(2):e0246457. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0246457. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0246457
PMID:33544753
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7870098/
Abstract

Wild pigs (Sus scrofa) are one of the most detrimental invasive mammals in the US. Lack of adequate population control has allowed pigs to become established across the landscape, causing significant ecological and economic damage. Given the need for additional tools for reducing wild pig populations, two toxicants, warfarin and sodium nitrite, are at the forefront of the discussion regarding future wild pig management. However, no research has examined stakeholders' perspectives towards the use of toxicants in wild pig management. Given the lack of knowledge, our goal was to determine stakeholders' perspectives towards the legal use of toxicants for managing wild pigs. We surveyed 1822 individuals from three stakeholder groups (hunters, farmers, and forestland owners) across Alabama during February 2018 using an online survey following the Tailored Design Method. All three stakeholder groups were generally supportive of toxicant use, though their views differed slightly by group. Furthermore, all stakeholder groups were supportive of toxicant purchasing and use regulations, while accidental water contamination, human health impact, and incorrect usage of a toxicant were stakeholders' greatest concerns. These results indicate that these groups would likely be in support of using toxicants for wild pig management in Alabama and could be a model for other states or locations. Consequently, these results have direct implications for shaping policy and possible use of toxicants as a future wild pig management tool.

摘要

野猪(Sus scrofa)是美国最具破坏性的入侵哺乳动物之一。由于缺乏有效的种群控制,野猪在美国各地大量繁殖,造成了严重的生态和经济损失。鉴于需要额外的工具来控制野猪数量,两种有毒物质——华法林和亚硝酸钠——成为了未来野猪管理的讨论焦点。然而,目前还没有研究探讨利益相关者对在野猪管理中使用有毒物质的看法。鉴于知识的缺乏,我们的目标是确定利益相关者对合法使用有毒物质来管理野猪的看法。我们在 2018 年 2 月采用 Tailored Design Method 对阿拉巴马州的三个利益相关者群体(猎人、农民和林地所有者)的 1822 人进行了在线调查。所有三个利益相关者群体普遍支持使用有毒物质,但他们的观点略有不同。此外,所有利益相关者群体都支持有毒物质的购买和使用法规,而意外水污染、人类健康影响和有毒物质的错误使用是利益相关者最大的担忧。这些结果表明,这些群体可能会支持在阿拉巴马州使用有毒物质来管理野猪,这也可能为其他州或地区提供借鉴。因此,这些结果直接影响到政策的制定和有毒物质作为未来野猪管理工具的可能使用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a7bb/7870098/d075cdebb1e1/pone.0246457.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a7bb/7870098/d075cdebb1e1/pone.0246457.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a7bb/7870098/d075cdebb1e1/pone.0246457.g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Stakeholder perspectives towards the use of toxicants for managing wild pigs.利益相关者对使用毒物来管理野猪的看法。
PLoS One. 2021 Feb 5;16(2):e0246457. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0246457. eCollection 2021.
2
Perceptions of Wild Pig Impact, Management, and Policy in Alabama.阿拉巴马州野猪影响、管理和政策认知。
Environ Manage. 2024 May;73(5):1032-1048. doi: 10.1007/s00267-024-01956-8. Epub 2024 Mar 11.
3
Cultural and regulatory factors influence distribution and trajectory of invasive species in the United States: A wild pig case study.文化和监管因素影响美国入侵物种的分布和轨迹:野猪案例研究。
J Environ Manage. 2023 Jul 15;338:117742. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.117742. Epub 2023 Mar 30.
4
Evaluation of a warfarin bait for controlling invasive wild pigs (Sus scrofa).评价一种用于控制入侵性野生猪(Sus scrofa)的华法林诱饵。
Pest Manag Sci. 2021 Jul;77(7):3057-3067. doi: 10.1002/ps.6351. Epub 2021 Mar 13.
5
Field evaluation of low-dose warfarin baits to control wild pigs (Sus scrofa) in North Texas.德克萨斯州北部利用低剂量华法林毒饵控制野猪(Sus scrofa)的野外评估
PLoS One. 2018 Nov 7;13(11):e0206070. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0206070. eCollection 2018.
6
Understanding tolerance for an invasive species: An investigation of hunter acceptance capacity for wild pigs (Sus scrofa) in Texas.理解对入侵物种的容忍度:对德克萨斯州野猪(Sus scrofa)猎人接受能力的调查。
J Environ Manage. 2021 May 1;285:112143. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112143. Epub 2021 Feb 22.
7
Assessing public support for restrictions on transport of invasive wild pigs (Sus scrofa) in the United States.评估美国公众对限制入侵性野猪(Sus scrofa)运输的支持程度。
J Environ Manage. 2019 May 1;237:488-494. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.02.107. Epub 2019 Feb 27.
8
Efficacy and risks from a modified sodium nitrite toxic bait for wild pigs.改良亚硝酸钠毒饵对野猪的功效和风险。
Pest Manag Sci. 2021 Apr;77(4):1616-1625. doi: 10.1002/ps.6180. Epub 2021 Jan 5.
9
Potential secondary poisoning risks to non-targets from a sodium nitrite toxic bait for invasive wild pigs.对入侵野猪的亚硝酸钠毒饵对非靶标造成潜在二次中毒风险。
Pest Manag Sci. 2018 Jan;74(1):181-188. doi: 10.1002/ps.4692. Epub 2017 Sep 5.
10
Selection of invasive wild pig countermeasures using multicriteria decision analysis.采用多准则决策分析选择入侵野猪对策。
Sci Total Environ. 2017 Jan 1;574:1164-1173. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.09.155. Epub 2016 Oct 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Perceptions of Wild Pig Impact, Management, and Policy in Alabama.阿拉巴马州野猪影响、管理和政策认知。
Environ Manage. 2024 May;73(5):1032-1048. doi: 10.1007/s00267-024-01956-8. Epub 2024 Mar 11.

本文引用的文献

1
Modelling Eurasian beaver foraging habitat and dam suitability, for predicting the location and number of dams throughout catchments in Great Britain.对欧亚河狸觅食栖息地和水坝适宜性进行建模,以预测英国各流域水坝的位置和数量。
Eur J Wildl Res. 2020;66(3):42. doi: 10.1007/s10344-020-01379-w. Epub 2020 May 7.
2
Assessing landowners' attitudes toward wild hogs and support for control options.评估土地所有者对野猪的态度以及对控制措施的支持度。
J Environ Manage. 2017 Oct 1;201:45-51. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.06.022. Epub 2017 Jun 20.
3
Landowners' Perspectives on Coordinated, Landscape-Level Invasive Species Control: The Role of Social and Ecological Context.
土地所有者对协调一致的景观层面入侵物种控制的看法:社会与生态背景的作用
Environ Manage. 2017 Mar;59(3):477-489. doi: 10.1007/s00267-016-0807-y. Epub 2017 Jan 11.
4
Clarifying values, risk perceptions, and attitudes to resolve or avoid social conflicts in invasive species management.明确价值观、风险认知,以及在入侵物种管理中解决或避免社会冲突的态度。
Conserv Biol. 2015 Feb;29(1):19-30. doi: 10.1111/cobi.12359. Epub 2014 Aug 22.
5
Understanding attitudes toward the control of nonnative wild and feral mammals: similarities and differences in the opinions of the general public, animal protectionists, and conservationists in New Zealand (aotearoa).了解对非本土野生和野生哺乳动物控制的态度:新西兰(奥特亚罗瓦)公众、动物保护主义者和自然资源保护主义者观点的异同。
J Appl Anim Welf Sci. 2014;17(1):1-17. doi: 10.1080/10888705.2013.799414. Epub 2013 Aug 8.
6
A framework for sustainable invasive species management: Environmental, social, and economic objectives.可持续入侵物种管理框架:环境、社会和经济目标。
J Environ Manage. 2011 Jan;92(1):14-22. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.08.025. Epub 2010 Sep 15.
7
Invasive species, ecosystem services and human well-being.入侵物种、生态系统服务与人类福祉。
Trends Ecol Evol. 2009 Sep;24(9):497-504. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2009.03.016. Epub 2009 Jul 3.
8
Biological invasions: recommendations for U.S. policy and management.生物入侵:美国政策与管理建议
Ecol Appl. 2006 Dec;16(6):2035-54. doi: 10.1890/1051-0761(2006)016[2035:birfup]2.0.co;2.
9
Pesticide regulation, product innovation and public attitudes.
J Environ Monit. 2001 Aug;3(4):64N-69N. doi: 10.1039/b105803g.
10
Federal and state pesticide regulations and legislation.联邦和州的农药法规与立法。
Annu Rev Entomol. 1975;20:119-31. doi: 10.1146/annurev.en.20.010175.001003.