• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Impact of tobacco industry and other corporations in the defeat of the 1994 Clinton health care plan.烟草行业及其他公司对1994年克林顿医疗保健计划失败的影响。
BMC Public Health. 2017 Jun 21;17(1):591. doi: 10.1186/s12889-017-4501-7.
2
"Our reach is wide by any corporate standard": how the tobacco industry helped defeat the Clinton health plan and why it matters now.“按照任何企业标准衡量,我们的影响力都很广泛”:烟草业如何帮助击败克林顿的健康计划,以及为何这在当下很重要。
Am J Public Health. 2010 Jul;100(7):1174-88. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2009.179150. Epub 2010 May 13.
3
Building alliances in unlikely places: progressive allies and the Tobacco Institute's coalition strategy on cigarette excise taxes.在看似不可能的地方建立联盟:进步派盟友与烟草协会关于卷烟消费税的联盟战略
Am J Public Health. 2009 Jul;99(7):1188-96. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2008.143131. Epub 2009 May 14.
4
Medicare Part C: tossing another cost cap into the ring.医疗保险C部分:又在讨论设置另一项成本上限。
J Am Health Policy. 1994 May-Jun;4(3):32-4.
5
Clinton signs Kassebaum-Kennedy bill--reduces barriers to health insurance.克林顿签署《卡斯鲍姆-肯尼迪法案》——降低医疗保险障碍。
Update Natl Minor AIDS Counc. 1996 Oct-Nov:6.
6
The Health Reform Consensus Act: proceed with caution.《医疗改革共识法案》:谨慎推进。
J Am Health Policy. 1994 May-Jun;4(3):28-31.
7
Changing conclusions on secondhand smoke in a sudden infant death syndrome review funded by the tobacco industry.在一项由烟草行业资助的婴儿猝死综合征评估中,关于二手烟的结论突然改变。
Pediatrics. 2005 Mar;115(3):e356-66. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-1922.
8
The rise and fall of tobacco control media campaigns, 1967 2006.1967 - 2006年烟草控制媒体宣传活动的兴衰
Am J Public Health. 2007 Aug;97(8):1383-96. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2006.097006. Epub 2007 Jun 28.
9
Lessons from the Clinton plan: incremental market reform, not sweeping government control.克林顿计划的经验教训:渐进式市场改革,而非全面政府管控。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2008 May-Jun;27(3):705-10. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.27.3.705.
10
Senator Edward M. Kennedy: making common cause with adversaries while committed to health reform.参议员爱德华·M·肯尼迪:在致力于医疗改革的同时与对手达成共同目标。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2009 Nov-Dec;28(6):w1049-51. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.28.6.w1049. Epub 2009 Sep 17.

本文引用的文献

1
"Our reach is wide by any corporate standard": how the tobacco industry helped defeat the Clinton health plan and why it matters now.“按照任何企业标准衡量,我们的影响力都很广泛”:烟草业如何帮助击败克林顿的健康计划,以及为何这在当下很重要。
Am J Public Health. 2010 Jul;100(7):1174-88. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2009.179150. Epub 2010 May 13.
2
Why the United States has no national health insurance: stakeholder mobilization against the welfare state, 1945--1996.
J Health Soc Behav. 2004;45 Suppl:25-44.
3
Patients' rights to care under Clinton's Health Security Act: the structure of reform.克林顿《健康保障法案》下患者的医疗护理权:改革架构
Am J Public Health. 1994 Aug;84(8):1330-5. doi: 10.2105/ajph.84.8.1330.

烟草行业及其他公司对1994年克林顿医疗保健计划失败的影响。

Impact of tobacco industry and other corporations in the defeat of the 1994 Clinton health care plan.

作者信息

Givel Michael

机构信息

Department of Political Science, The University of Oklahoma, 455 West Lindsey, Room 215, Norman, OK, 73019, USA.

出版信息

BMC Public Health. 2017 Jun 21;17(1):591. doi: 10.1186/s12889-017-4501-7.

DOI:10.1186/s12889-017-4501-7
PMID:28637441
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5480110/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The primary reason cited by many scholars for the defeat of the Clinton Administration's 1994 health care reform bill has long been identified as Health Insurance Association of America and National Federation of Independent Businesses opposition to the bill. Given this predominant consensus combined with sizeable proposed funding for the bill by a large tobacco product tax, this manuscript examined what the tobacco industry's role was in whole or part in defeating the Clinton health care bill.

METHODS

This research occurred through crosschecking internal tobacco industry documents and Clinton White House documents.

RESULTS

Prior to the passage of the bill, the tobacco industry accepted a compromise of 45 cents per pack increase phased in over five years. Due to this compromise, the industry or third party allies had no role in the ultimate defeat in the bill.

CONCLUSIONS

The primary reason for the bill's ultimate defeat was general business (but not tobacco industry and third party ally) opposition, the bill running out of time, and conflicting bills. Secondary reasons for the bill's defeat included issues with: employer mandates, high taxes on insurance plans, impacts on medical research and education, Congressional attention to other issues, election year politics, and possible future excise tax possibilities.

摘要

背景

长期以来,许多学者认为克林顿政府1994年医疗改革法案失败的主要原因是美国健康保险协会和全国独立企业联合会反对该法案。鉴于这种主流共识,再加上该法案通过大幅提高烟草产品税获得可观的拟议资金,本文探讨了烟草业在克林顿医疗法案失败中是否或多或少起到了作用。

方法

本研究通过交叉核对烟草行业内部文件和克林顿白宫文件进行。

结果

在该法案通过之前,烟草业接受了一项为期五年逐步实施的每包提价45美分的妥协方案。由于这一妥协,该行业或第三方盟友在该法案最终失败中没有起到任何作用。

结论

该法案最终失败的主要原因是企业界(而非烟草业和第三方盟友)的反对、法案时间耗尽以及相互冲突的法案。该法案失败的次要原因包括以下问题:雇主强制参保、保险计划高额税收、对医学研究和教育的影响、国会对其他问题的关注、选举年政治以及未来可能的消费税可能性。