Maier Kaitlyn L, McKinstry-Wu Andrew R, Palanca Ben Julian A, Tarnal Vijay, Blain-Moraes Stefanie, Basner Mathias, Avidan Michael S, Mashour George A, Kelz Max B
Department of Pharmacology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of PennsylvaniaPhiladelphia, PA, United States.
Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Perelman School of Medicine, University of PennsylvaniaPhiladelphia, PA, United States.
Front Hum Neurosci. 2017 Jun 7;11:284. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2017.00284. eCollection 2017.
Important scientific and clinical questions persist about general anesthesia despite the ubiquitous clinical use of anesthetic drugs in humans since their discovery. For example, it is not known how the brain reconstitutes consciousness and cognition after the profound functional perturbation of the anesthetized state, nor has a specific pattern of functional recovery been characterized. To date, there has been a lack of detailed investigation into rates of recovery and the potential orderly return of attention, sensorimotor function, memory, reasoning and logic, abstract thinking, and processing speed. Moreover, whether such neurobehavioral functions display an invariant sequence of return across individuals is similarly unknown. To address these questions, we designed a study of healthy volunteers undergoing general anesthesia with electroencephalography and serial testing of cognitive functions (NCT01911195). The aims of this study are to characterize the temporal patterns of neurobehavioral recovery over the first several hours following termination of a deep inhaled isoflurane general anesthetic and to identify common patterns of cognitive function recovery. Additionally, we will conduct spectral analysis and reconstruct functional networks from electroencephalographic data to identify any neural correlates (e.g., connectivity patterns, graph-theoretical variables) of cognitive recovery after the perturbation of general anesthesia. To accomplish these objectives, we will enroll a total of 60 consenting adults aged 20-40 across the three participating sites. Half of the study subjects will receive general anesthesia slowly titrated to loss of consciousness (LOC) with an intravenous infusion of propofol and thereafter be maintained for 3 h with 1.3 age adjusted minimum alveolar concentration of isoflurane, while the other half of subjects serves as awake controls to gauge effects of repeated neurobehavioral testing, spontaneous fatigue and endogenous rest-activity patterns.
尽管自麻醉药物被发现以来已在临床上广泛应用,但关于全身麻醉仍存在重要的科学和临床问题。例如,目前尚不清楚大脑在经历麻醉状态下的深度功能扰动后如何重新恢复意识和认知,也未明确功能恢复的具体模式。迄今为止,对于恢复速度以及注意力、感觉运动功能、记忆、推理与逻辑、抽象思维和处理速度等潜在有序恢复情况缺乏详细研究。此外,这些神经行为功能在个体间是否呈现不变的恢复顺序同样未知。为解决这些问题,我们设计了一项针对接受全身麻醉的健康志愿者的研究,采用脑电图监测以及认知功能的系列测试(NCT01911195)。本研究的目的是描绘在深度吸入异氟烷全身麻醉结束后的最初几个小时内神经行为恢复的时间模式,并确定认知功能恢复的常见模式。此外,我们将对脑电图数据进行频谱分析并重建功能网络,以识别全身麻醉扰动后认知恢复的任何神经关联(例如,连接模式、图论变量)。为实现这些目标,我们将在三个参与地点共招募60名年龄在20至40岁之间的成年志愿者。一半的研究对象将通过静脉输注丙泊酚缓慢滴定至意识丧失(LOC),随后用1.3倍年龄校正的最低肺泡浓度的异氟烷维持3小时,而另一半对象作为清醒对照,以评估重复神经行为测试、自发疲劳和内源性静息 - 活动模式的影响。