Suppr超能文献

在教皇与讲坛之间:人格测量能否帮助识别性侵神职人员?

Between the Pew and the Pulpit: Can Personality Measures Help Identify Sexually Abusive Clergy?

机构信息

1 John Jay College of Criminal Justice, New York, NY, USA.

2 Utah State University, Logan, UT, USA.

出版信息

Sex Abuse. 2019 Sep;31(6):686-706. doi: 10.1177/1079063217716442. Epub 2017 Jun 22.

Abstract

There has been limited conclusive research examining the personality characteristics of clergy who perpetrate abuse. To address this dearth of research, the current study aimed to develop a personality profile that distinguishes clergy members who sexually abuse children from other clergy. Personality and psychopathology were assessed using the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2 (MMPI-2) and the Millon Clinical Multiaxial Inventory-III (MCMI-III). Data were analyzed from a sample of clergy members, who comprised four comparison groups: clergy members referred to treatment for (a) child sexual abuse, (b) sexual misconduct with adults, (c) general clinical problems, or (d) routine employment evaluations with no previously identified clinical or sexual issues. While differences were found between groups, only the Aggressive/Sadistic scale of the MCMI-III consistently distinguished clerics who sexually abused children from all other clergy members. Findings are discussed in regard to the utility of the MMPI-2 and MCMI-III as a screening tool for clerical applicants for the Catholic Church.

摘要

关于实施虐待行为的神职人员的人格特征,已有有限的明确研究进行了探讨。为了解决这一研究不足的问题,本研究旨在制定一个人格特征描述,将实施儿童性虐待的神职人员与其他神职人员区分开来。使用明尼苏达多相人格测验-2(MMPI-2)和密尔登临床多轴人格测验-III(MCMI-III)评估人格和精神病理学。对一个神职人员样本进行了数据分析,该样本由四个比较组组成:因(a)儿童性虐待、(b)与成年人的性行为不当、(c)一般临床问题或(d)常规就业评估而被转介治疗的神职人员,这些评估均无先前确定的临床或性行为问题。尽管发现了群体之间的差异,但只有 MCMI-III 的攻击/虐待量表始终将对儿童进行性虐待的神职人员与所有其他神职人员区分开来。研究结果讨论了 MMPI-2 和 MCMI-III 作为天主教会神职人员申请人筛查工具的效用。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验