• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

阿肯色州与其他州中寻求堕胎的未成年人的司法豁免权。

Judicial Bypass for Minors Seeking Abortions in Arkansas Versus Other States.

作者信息

Altindag Onur, Joyce Ted

机构信息

Onur Altindag is with the Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Harvard University, and Harvard Center for Population and Development Studies, Cambridge, MA. Ted Joyce is with Baruch College, City University of New York and National Bureau of Economic Research, New York, NY.

出版信息

Am J Public Health. 2017 Aug;107(8):1266-1271. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2017.303822. Epub 2017 Jun 22.

DOI:10.2105/AJPH.2017.303822
PMID:28640684
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5508140/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To describe demographic characteristics and abortion timing of minors in Arkansas who obtained an abortion through a judicial bypass, and to contrast the frequency of judicial bypass in other states in the United States.

METHODS

We used individual-level data on all abortions to minors (n = 2624) performed in Arkansas from 2005 to 2014 and aggregated data from 10 additional states on abortions obtained through a judicial bypass. We characterized correlates of the judicial bypass and its association with the timing of abortion.

RESULTS

Minors in Arkansas who used the courts were more likely to be 17 years of age, nonresidents of Arkansas, Hispanic, and with fewer previous pregnancies than their younger, resident, non-Hispanic White, and multigravida counterparts; 7.7% of abortions to minors were obtained via a bypass in 11 states, but only 2% if Texas and Arkansas are excluded.

CONCLUSIONS

The demographics of minors who obtain an abortion through a judicial bypass differ significantly from those who have parental consent, and there is widespread variation in the proportion of bypass cases across states.

摘要

目的

描述阿肯色州通过司法豁免获得堕胎的未成年人的人口统计学特征和堕胎时间,并对比美国其他州司法豁免的频率。

方法

我们使用了2005年至2014年在阿肯色州对未成年人进行的所有堕胎的个体层面数据(n = 2624),以及另外10个州通过司法豁免获得堕胎的汇总数据。我们描述了司法豁免的相关因素及其与堕胎时间的关联。

结果

在阿肯色州,通过法院途径的未成年人比其年龄较小、为本州居民、非西班牙裔白人且有多次怀孕经历的同龄人更有可能为17岁、非阿肯色州居民、西班牙裔且既往怀孕次数较少;在11个州,7.7%的未成年人堕胎是通过豁免获得的,但如果排除得克萨斯州和阿肯色州,这一比例仅为2%。

结论

通过司法豁免获得堕胎的未成年人的人口统计学特征与获得父母同意的未成年人有显著差异,并且各州豁免案例的比例存在广泛差异。

相似文献

1
Judicial Bypass for Minors Seeking Abortions in Arkansas Versus Other States.阿肯色州与其他州中寻求堕胎的未成年人的司法豁免权。
Am J Public Health. 2017 Aug;107(8):1266-1271. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2017.303822. Epub 2017 Jun 22.
2
Use of Judicial Bypass of Mandatory Parental Consent to Access Abortion and Judicial Bypass Denials, Florida and Texas, 2018-2021.2018-2021 年,佛罗里达州和德克萨斯州使用司法豁免强制父母同意堕胎和拒绝司法豁免的情况。
Am J Public Health. 2023 Mar;113(3):316-319. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2022.307173. Epub 2023 Jan 12.
3
Parental consent for abortion and the judicial bypass option in Arkansas: effects and correlates.阿肯色州的堕胎父母同意和司法回避选择:效果和相关性。
Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2010 Sep;42(3):168-75. doi: 10.1363/4216810.
4
Massachusetts' Parental Consent Law and Procedural Timing Among Adolescents Undergoing Abortion.马萨诸塞州父母同意法与行人工流产术青少年的程序时间安排。
Obstet Gynecol. 2019 May;133(5):978-986. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003190.
5
Denials of Judicial Bypass Petitions for Abortion in Texas Before and After the 2016 Bypass Process Change: 2001-2018.2001 年至 2018 年,德克萨斯州在 2016 年绕过程序变更前后对堕胎的司法回避申请的拒绝情况。
Am J Public Health. 2020 Mar;110(3):351-353. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2019.305491. Epub 2020 Jan 16.
6
Assisting minors seeking abortions in judicial bypass proceedings: a guardian ad litem is no substitute for an attorney.在司法绕过程序中协助未成年人寻求堕胎:诉讼监护人不能替代律师。
Vanderbilt Law Rev. 2002 Mar;55(2):581-606.
7
Judicial bypass attorneys' experiences with abortion stigma in Texas courts.德克萨斯州法院中司法回避律师对堕胎污名的经历。
Soc Sci Med. 2021 Jan;269:113508. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.113508. Epub 2020 Nov 10.
8
Reasons for and Logistical Burdens of Judicial Bypass for Abortion in Illinois.伊利诺伊州堕胎司法豁免的原因和后勤负担。
J Adolesc Health. 2021 Jan;68(1):71-78. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2020.08.025. Epub 2020 Oct 8.
9
The impact of requirements for parental consent on minors' abortions in Mississippi.密西西比州父母同意要求对未成年人堕胎的影响。
Fam Plann Perspect. 1995 May-Jun;27(3):120-2.
10
Judicial bypass of parental consent for abortion: characteristics of pregnant minor "Jane Doe's".堕胎司法绕过父母同意:未成年孕妇“简· Doe”的特征。
J Nerv Ment Dis. 2015 Jun;203(6):401-5. doi: 10.1097/NMD.0000000000000298.

引用本文的文献

1
Parental Involvement Policies for Minors Seeking Abortion in the Southeast and Quality of Care.东南部地区未成年女性寻求堕胎时的父母参与政策与医疗质量
Sex Res Social Policy. 2022 Mar;19(1):264-272. doi: 10.1007/s13178-021-00539-0. Epub 2021 Feb 13.
2
Judicial bypass for minors post-.未成年人案件的司法豁免后置。
Womens Health (Lond). 2023 Jan-Dec;19:17455057231219601. doi: 10.1177/17455057231219601.
3
The impact of third-party authorization requirements on abortion-related outcomes: a synthesis of legal and health evidence.第三方授权要求对堕胎相关结果的影响:法律和健康证据的综合分析。
BMC Public Health. 2023 Oct 23;23(1):2065. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-16307-1.
4
The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on abortion care utilization and disparities by age.COVID-19 大流行对堕胎护理利用和年龄差异的影响。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2022 Jun;226(6):819.e1-819.e15. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2022.01.025. Epub 2022 Jan 31.
5
Identifying data for the empirical assessment of law (IDEAL): a realist approach to research gaps on the health effects of abortion law.识别法律实证评估的资料(IDEAL):研究堕胎法对健康影响的差距的现实主义方法。
BMJ Glob Health. 2021 Jun;6(6). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2021-005120.
6
Judicial bypass attorneys' experiences with abortion stigma in Texas courts.德克萨斯州法院中司法回避律师对堕胎污名的经历。
Soc Sci Med. 2021 Jan;269:113508. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.113508. Epub 2020 Nov 10.
7
The Impact of Parental Involvement Laws on the Abortion Rate of Minors.父母参与法对未成年人堕胎率的影响。
Demography. 2020 Feb;57(1):323-346. doi: 10.1007/s13524-019-00853-8.
8
Denials of Judicial Bypass Petitions for Abortion in Texas Before and After the 2016 Bypass Process Change: 2001-2018.2001 年至 2018 年,德克萨斯州在 2016 年绕过程序变更前后对堕胎的司法回避申请的拒绝情况。
Am J Public Health. 2020 Mar;110(3):351-353. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2019.305491. Epub 2020 Jan 16.
9
Young Women's Experiences Obtaining Judicial Bypass for Abortion in Texas.德克萨斯州年轻女性获得堕胎司法豁免的经历。
J Adolesc Health. 2019 Jan;64(1):20-25. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2018.07.017. Epub 2018 Sep 6.

本文引用的文献

1
Abortion Incidence and Service Availability In the United States, 2014.2014年美国的堕胎发生率与服务可及性
Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2017 Mar;49(1):17-27. doi: 10.1363/psrh.12015. Epub 2017 Jan 17.
2
Judicial bypass of parental consent for abortion: characteristics of pregnant minor "Jane Doe's".堕胎司法绕过父母同意:未成年孕妇“简· Doe”的特征。
J Nerv Ment Dis. 2015 Jun;203(6):401-5. doi: 10.1097/NMD.0000000000000298.
3
Incidence of emergency department visits and complications after abortion.堕胎后急诊就诊和并发症的发生率。
Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Jan;125(1):175-183. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000000603.
4
Abortion surveillance - United States, 2011.流产监测-美国,2011 年。
MMWR Surveill Summ. 2014 Nov 28;63(11):1-41.
5
Factors influencing parental involvement among minors seeking an abortion: a qualitative study.影响寻求堕胎的未成年人中父母参与情况的因素:一项定性研究。
Am J Public Health. 2014 Nov;104(11):2207-11. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2014.302116. Epub 2014 Sep 11.
6
Abortion incidence and service availability in the United States, 2011.美国 2011 年的堕胎发生率和服务提供情况。
Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2014 Mar;46(1):3-14. doi: 10.1363/46e0414. Epub 2014 Feb 3.
7
Abortion surveillance - United States, 2010.流产监测 - 美国,2010 年。
MMWR Surveill Summ. 2013 Nov 29;62(8):1-44.
8
Abortion surveillance--United States, 2008.人工流产监测——美国,2008 年。
MMWR Surveill Summ. 2011 Nov 25;60(15):1-41.
9
Parental consent for abortion and the judicial bypass option in Arkansas: effects and correlates.阿肯色州的堕胎父母同意和司法回避选择:效果和相关性。
Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2010 Sep;42(3):168-75. doi: 10.1363/4216810.
10
Timing of steps and reasons for delays in obtaining abortions in the United States.美国堕胎过程中各步骤的时间安排及延迟原因。
Contraception. 2006 Oct;74(4):334-44. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2006.04.010. Epub 2006 Jun 30.