All authors: Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
J Clin Oncol. 2017 Jul 20;35(21):2355-2363. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2017.72.7842. Epub 2017 Jun 22.
Current therapies for medulloblastoma were introduced primarily in the 1980s and consist of predominantly cytotoxic, nontargeted approaches. Mortality from medulloblastoma remains significant. In addition, many survivors suffer from severe treatment-related effects of radiation and cytotoxic chemotherapy. Further intensification of nonspecific therapy is unlikely to offer additional benefits, because survival rates have reached a plateau. Recent publications in medulloblastoma have revolved largely around the recognition that medulloblastoma per se does not exist, but rather, that there are a group of histologically similar but clinically and molecularly distinct entities that have been grouped under that rubric. Distinguishing the four molecular subgroups of medulloblastoma-wingless (WNT), sonic hedgehog (SHH), group 3, and group 4-in the daily treatment of patients, as well in the setting of clinical trials, is an important challenge in the near term for the pediatric neuro-oncology community. The preponderance of morbidity in treating patients with medulloblastoma is secondary to the treatment or prophylaxis of leptomeningeal metastases, and the cause of most deaths is leptomeningeal metastases. Recurrence of medulloblastoma is a nearly universally fatal event, with no significant salvage rate. The extent of spatial and temporal intratumoral heterogeneity as medulloblastoma metastasizes to leptomeninges and as it evolves in the face of radiation and cytotoxic chemotherapy is just beginning to be understood as a major barrier to therapeutic success. Pediatric neuro-oncology clinicians and scientists must now determine how best to incorporate rapid changes in our biologic understanding of medulloblastoma into the next generation of upfront clinical trials, with the goal of both improving survival for the highest-risk patients and improving quality of life for survivors.
目前的髓母细胞瘤治疗方法主要是在 20 世纪 80 年代引入的,主要采用细胞毒性、非靶向方法。髓母细胞瘤的死亡率仍然很高。此外,许多幸存者都遭受着辐射和细胞毒性化疗等严重的治疗相关副作用。进一步强化非特异性治疗不太可能带来额外的好处,因为生存率已经达到了一个平台期。最近关于髓母细胞瘤的出版物主要集中在认识到髓母细胞瘤本身并不存在,而是存在一组组织学上相似但临床和分子上不同的实体,这些实体被归为同一类别。在日常治疗患者以及临床试验中,区分髓母细胞瘤的四个分子亚群——无翅型(WNT)、声 Hedgehog(SHH)、第 3 组和第 4 组——是儿科神经肿瘤学界近期的一个重要挑战。治疗髓母细胞瘤患者的发病率高,主要是因为治疗或预防脑膜转移,而大多数死亡的原因是脑膜转移。髓母细胞瘤的复发几乎是普遍致命的,没有明显的挽救率。髓母细胞瘤向脑膜转移以及在面对辐射和细胞毒性化疗时的演变过程中,肿瘤的空间和时间异质性的程度才刚刚开始被理解为治疗成功的主要障碍。儿科神经肿瘤临床医生和科学家现在必须确定如何最好地将我们对髓母细胞瘤的生物学认识的快速变化纳入下一代的一线临床试验中,目的是提高高危患者的生存率,并提高幸存者的生活质量。