Suppr超能文献

论证:一种促进批判性思维的方法。

Argumentation: A Methodology to Facilitate Critical Thinking.

作者信息

Makhene Agnes

出版信息

Int J Nurs Educ Scholarsh. 2017 Jun 20;14(1):/j/ijnes.2017.14.issue-1/ijnes-2016-0030/ijnes-2016-0030.xml. doi: 10.1515/ijnes-2016-0030.

Abstract

Caring is a difficult nursing activity that involves a complex nature of a human being in need of complex decision-making and problem solving through the critical thinking process. It is mandatory that critical thinking is facilitated in general and in nursing education particularly in order to render care in diverse multicultural patient care settings. This paper aims to describe how argumentation can be used to facilitate critical thinking in learners. A qualitative, exploratory and descriptive design that is contextual was used. Purposive sampling method was used to draw a sample and Miles and Huberman methodology of qualitative analysis was used to analyse data. Lincoln and Guba's strategies were employed to ensure trustworthiness, while Dhai and McQuoid-Mason's principles of ethical consideration were used. Following data analysis the findings were integrated within literature which culminated into the formulation of guidelines that can be followed when using argumentation as a methodology to facilitate critical thinking.

摘要

关怀是一项困难的护理活动,它涉及到一个复杂的人,这个人需要通过批判性思维过程进行复杂的决策和解决问题。一般来说,尤其是在护理教育中,促进批判性思维是必不可少的,以便在多元文化的患者护理环境中提供护理。本文旨在描述如何利用论证来促进学习者的批判性思维。采用了定性、探索性和描述性的情境设计。采用目的抽样方法抽取样本,并使用迈尔斯和休伯曼的定性分析方法分析数据。采用林肯和古巴的策略来确保可信度,同时采用戴和麦夸德-梅森的伦理考虑原则。经过数据分析,研究结果被整合到文献中,最终形成了在使用论证作为促进批判性思维的方法时可以遵循的指导方针。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验