Stingu Catalina Suzana, Eschrich Klaus, Thiel Juliane, Borgmann Toralf, Schaumann Reiner, Rodloff Arne C
Institute for Medical Microbiology and Epidemiology of Infectious Diseases, University Hospital, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
Rudolf-Schoenheimer-Institute for Biochemistry, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
Ann Lab Med. 2017 Sep;37(5):434-437. doi: 10.3343/alm.2017.37.5.434.
Two matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF-MS)-based methods were compared for their ability to identify viridans streptococci. One approach employed a reference database and software developed in-house. All inhouse measurements were performed using an Autoflex II Instrument (Bruker Daltonics GmbH, Germany). The other system, a VITEK-MS (BioMérieux, France) was operated on the commercially available V2.0 Knowledge Base for Clinical Use database. Clinical isolates of viridans streptococci (n=184) were examined. Discrepant results were resolved by 16S rDNA sequencing. Species-level identification percentages were compared by a chi-square test. The in-house method correctly identified 179 (97%) and 175 (95%) isolates to the group and species level respectively. In comparison, the VITEK-MS system correctly identified 145 (79%) isolates to the group and species level. The difference between the two methods was statistically significant at both group and species levels. Using the Autoflex II instrument combined with an extraction method instead of whole cell analysis resulted in more reliable viridans streptococci identification. Our results suggest that combining extraction with powerful analysis software and the careful choice of well-identified strains included into the database was useful for identifying viridans streptococci species.
比较了两种基于基质辅助激光解吸电离飞行时间质谱(MALDI-TOF-MS)的方法鉴定草绿色链球菌的能力。一种方法采用自行开发的参考数据库和软件。所有内部测量均使用Autoflex II仪器(德国布鲁克道尔顿公司)进行。另一个系统是VITEK-MS(法国生物梅里埃公司),使用市售的V2.0临床使用知识库数据库运行。对184株草绿色链球菌临床分离株进行了检测。通过16S rDNA测序解决了不一致的结果。通过卡方检验比较种水平鉴定百分比。内部方法分别在群水平和种水平正确鉴定了179株(97%)和175株(95%)分离株。相比之下,VITEK-MS系统在群水平和种水平正确鉴定了145株(79%)分离株。两种方法在群水平和种水平的差异均具有统计学意义。使用Autoflex II仪器结合提取方法而非全细胞分析可实现更可靠的草绿色链球菌鉴定。我们的结果表明,将提取方法与强大的分析软件相结合,并仔细选择纳入数据库的鉴定明确的菌株,有助于鉴定草绿色链球菌种。