• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

窄径种植体的应力分布的实验评估:有限元分析。

Experimental evaluation of stress distribution with narrow diameter implants: A finite element analysis.

机构信息

Prosthodontist, Gumushane Sehit Ebe Kevser Ceylan Public Oral Health Center, Gumushane, Turkey.

Assistant Professor, Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Ordu University, Ordu, Turkey.

出版信息

J Prosthet Dent. 2018 Mar;119(3):417-425. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2017.04.024. Epub 2017 Jun 20.

DOI:10.1016/j.prosdent.2017.04.024
PMID:28645665
Abstract

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM

Narrow diameter implants were developed to allow placement in narrow alveolar ridges. Clinicians may have concerns about the durability and function of such implants.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this finite element study was to compare the stress values occurring on the implant and at the implant bone interface after the application of the static and dynamic forces on narrow diameter, titanium and titanium-zirconia implants in the maxillary and mandibular second premolar region.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Titanium (Ti) and titanium-zirconium (Ti-Zr) narrow diameter implants (3.3 mm in diameter, 10 mm in length) were simulated in the maxillary and mandibular second premolar region, and metal-ceramic crown restorations were designed. Forces of 100 N were applied to crowns in a vertical and oblique (45-degree angle to the long axis) direction. Maximum and minimum principal stresses in the cortical and trabecular bone and the von Mises stresses and fatigue strength of the implants were evaluated with 3-dimensional finite element analysis.

RESULTS

In vertical and oblique static loading, Ti and Ti-Zr implants showed similar stress distribution within the same jaw models. However, the von Mises stresses in Ti-Zr implants were slightly higher than for Ti implants in all models. In oblique static and dynamic loading, all stresses were found higher than vertical loading, and fatigue failure results were found to be more critical than vertical forces.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on a numerical simulation, Ti and Ti-Zr alloys can be used successfully as narrow diameter implants in the second premolar area.

摘要

问题陈述

为了能够在狭窄的牙槽嵴中进行植入,开发了直径较细的种植体。临床医生可能会对这些种植体的耐用性和功能存在担忧。

目的

本有限元研究的目的是比较在上颌和下颌第二前磨牙区域,静态和动态力作用于钛和钛锆窄直径种植体时,种植体和种植体骨界面上的应力值。

材料和方法

在上颌和下颌第二前磨牙区域模拟了直径为 3.3 毫米、长度为 10 毫米的钛(Ti)和钛锆(Ti-Zr)窄直径种植体,并设计了金属陶瓷冠修复体。在垂直和倾斜(与长轴成 45 度角)方向上向牙冠施加 100 N 的力。使用三维有限元分析评估皮质骨和小梁骨中的最大和最小主应力、von Mises 应力和种植体的疲劳强度。

结果

在垂直和倾斜静态加载下,Ti 和 Ti-Zr 种植体在相同的颌骨模型中表现出相似的应力分布。然而,在所有模型中,Ti-Zr 种植体的 von Mises 应力略高于 Ti 种植体。在倾斜静态和动态加载下,所有的应力都比垂直加载高,疲劳失效的结果比垂直力更关键。

结论

根据数值模拟,Ti 和 Ti-Zr 合金可以成功地用作第二前磨牙区域的窄直径种植体。

相似文献

1
Experimental evaluation of stress distribution with narrow diameter implants: A finite element analysis.窄径种植体的应力分布的实验评估:有限元分析。
J Prosthet Dent. 2018 Mar;119(3):417-425. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2017.04.024. Epub 2017 Jun 20.
2
Static and Dynamic Stress Analysis of Standard- and Narrow-Diameter Implants: A 3D Finite Element Analysis.标准直径和窄直径种植体的静态和动态应力分析:三维有限元分析。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2020 Jul/Aug;35(4):e58-e68. doi: 10.11607/jomi.8037.
3
Finite element analysis of stress distribution with splinted and nonsplinted maxillary anterior fixed prostheses supported by zirconia or titanium implants.带或不带夹板的上颌前固定义齿修复的氧化锆或钛种植体支持的有限元分析。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2013 Jan-Feb;28(1):e27-38. doi: 10.11607/jomi.2442.
4
Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis of the Biomechanical Behaviors of Implants with Different Connections, Lengths, and Diameters Placed in the Maxillary Anterior Region.上颌前部区域不同连接方式、长度和直径种植体生物力学行为的三维有限元分析
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2016 Jan-Feb;31(1):101-10. doi: 10.11607/jomi.4120. Epub 2015 Oct 16.
5
Evaluation of stresses occurring on three different zirconia dental implants: three-dimensional finite element analysis.三种不同氧化锆牙科种植体的受力评估:三维有限元分析。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2010 Jan-Feb;25(1):95-103.
6
Titanium versus zirconia implants supporting maxillary overdentures: three-dimensional finite element analysis.钛种植体与氧化锆种植体支持上颌覆盖义齿的三维有限元分析。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2013 Sep-Oct;28(5):e198-208. doi: 10.11607/jomi.3019.
7
Evaluation of stress distributions occurring on zirconia and titanium implant-supported prostheses: A three-dimensional finite element analysis.氧化锆和钛种植体支持的假体上应力分布的评估:三维有限元分析。
J Prosthet Dent. 2016 Sep;116(3):346-55. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.01.022. Epub 2016 Apr 8.
8
Static and dynamic stress analysis of different crown materials on a titanium base abutment in an implant-supported single crown: a 3D finite element analysis.不同冠材料对钛基种植体支持单冠的静态和动态应力分析:三维有限元分析。
BMC Oral Health. 2024 May 10;24(1):545. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-04328-0.
9
Effect of different restorative crown and customized abutment materials on stress distribution in single implants and peripheral bone: A three-dimensional finite element analysis study.不同修复冠和定制基台材料对单颗种植体及其周围骨体中应力分布的影响:一项三维有限元分析研究。
J Prosthet Dent. 2018 Mar;119(3):437-445. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2017.03.008. Epub 2017 Jun 20.
10
Influences of Implant and Framework Materials on Stress Distribution: A Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis Study.种植体与基托材料对应力分布的影响:三维有限元分析研究
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2018 Sep/Oct;33(5):e117-e126. doi: 10.11607/jomi.6261.

引用本文的文献

1
Non-Linear Biomechanical Evaluation and Comparison in the Assessment of Three Different Piece Dental Implant Systems for the Molar Region: A Finite Element Study.用于磨牙区的三种不同分体式牙种植体系统评估中的非线性生物力学评价与比较:一项有限元研究
J Funct Biomater. 2025 Jan 9;16(1):17. doi: 10.3390/jfb16010017.
2
Influence of prosthetic index structures and implant materials on stress distribution in implant restorations: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.种植体修复体中修复指数结构和种植体材料对种植体周围骨组织应力分布的影响:三维有限元分析。
BMC Oral Health. 2024 Aug 6;24(1):901. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-04680-1.
3
Clinical challenges of biomechanical performance of narrow-diameter implants in maxillary posterior teeth in aging patients: A finite element analysis.
老年患者上颌后牙应用小直径种植体的生物力学性能的临床挑战:有限元分析。
PLoS One. 2024 Mar 25;19(3):e0299816. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0299816. eCollection 2024.
4
Evaluation of two treatment concepts of four implants supporting fixed prosthesis in an atrophic maxilla: finite element analysis.评价两种治疗方案对 4 颗种植体支持固定修复体在萎缩上颌骨中的应用:有限元分析。
BMC Oral Health. 2023 Dec 8;23(1):983. doi: 10.1186/s12903-023-03706-4.
5
Biomechanical evaluations of the long-term stability of dental implant using finite element modeling method: a systematic review.使用有限元建模方法对牙种植体长期稳定性的生物力学评估:一项系统评价。
J Adv Prosthodont. 2022 Jun;14(3):182-202. doi: 10.4047/jap.2022.14.3.182. Epub 2022 Jun 27.
6
Carfilzomib inhibits the proliferation and apoptosis of multiple myeloma cells by inhibiting STAT1/COX-2/iNOS signaling pathway.卡非佐米通过抑制STAT1/COX-2/iNOS信号通路抑制多发性骨髓瘤细胞的增殖和凋亡。
Transl Cancer Res. 2022 Jan;11(1):206-216. doi: 10.21037/tcr-21-2534.
7
Biomechanical finite element analysis of short-implant-supported, 3-unit, fixed CAD/CAM prostheses in the posterior mandible.下颌后牙区短种植体支持的三单位 CAD/CAM 固定修复体的生物力学有限元分析
Int J Implant Dent. 2022 Feb 11;8(1):8. doi: 10.1186/s40729-022-00404-8.
8
Three-Dimensional Finite Element Investigation into Effects of Implant Thread Design and Loading Rate on Stress Distribution in Dental Implants and Anisotropic Bone.种植体螺纹设计和加载速率对牙种植体及各向异性骨应力分布影响的三维有限元研究
Materials (Basel). 2021 Nov 18;14(22):6974. doi: 10.3390/ma14226974.
9
Comparative analysis of stress distribution in one-piece and two-piece implants with narrow and extra-narrow diameters: A finite element study.一体式和分体式种植体在窄径和超窄径下的应力分布比较分析:有限元研究。
PLoS One. 2021 Feb 4;16(2):e0245800. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0245800. eCollection 2021.
10
Coating doxycycline on titanium-based implants: Two in vivo studies.在钛基植入物上涂覆强力霉素:两项体内研究。
Bioact Mater. 2020 Jun 22;5(4):787-797. doi: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2020.05.007. eCollection 2020 Dec.