Hosseini-Faradonbeh Seyed Aref, Katoozian Hamid Reza
Department of Biomedical Engineering, Amirkabir University of Technology (Tehran Polytechnic), Tehran, Iran.
J Adv Prosthodont. 2022 Jun;14(3):182-202. doi: 10.4047/jap.2022.14.3.182. Epub 2022 Jun 27.
The aim of this study is to summarize various biomechanical aspects in evaluating the long-term stability of dental implants based on finite element method (FEM).
A comprehensive search was performed among published studies over the last 20 years in three databases; PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar. The studies are arranged in a comparative table based on their publication date. Also, the variety of modeling is shown in the form of graphs and tables. Various aspects of the studies conducted were discussed here.
By reviewing the titles and abstracts, 9 main categories were extracted and discussed as follows: implant materials, the focus of the study on bone or implant as well as the interface area, type of loading, element shape, parts of the model, boundary conditions, failure criteria, statistical analysis, and experimental tests performed to validate the results. It was found that most of the studied articles contain a model of the jaw bone (cortical and cancellous bone). The material properties were generally derived from the literature. Approximately 43% of the studies attempted to examine the implant and surrounding bone simultaneously. Almost 42% of the studies performed experimental tests to validate the modeling.
Based on the results of the studies reviewed, there is no "optimal" design guideline, but more reliable design of implant is possible. This review study can be a starting point for more detailed investigations of dental implant longevity.
本研究旨在总结基于有限元法(FEM)评估牙种植体长期稳定性的各种生物力学方面。
在过去20年发表的研究中,对三个数据库(PubMed、Scopus和谷歌学术)进行了全面检索。这些研究根据其发表日期排列在一个比较表中。此外,建模的多样性以图表形式展示。这里讨论了所进行研究的各个方面。
通过审查标题和摘要,提取并讨论了9个主要类别,如下所示:种植体材料、研究对骨或种植体以及界面区域的关注、加载类型、单元形状、模型部分、边界条件、失效标准、统计分析以及为验证结果而进行的实验测试。发现大多数研究文章包含颌骨模型(皮质骨和松质骨)。材料特性一般来自文献。约43%的研究试图同时检查种植体和周围骨。近42%的研究进行了实验测试以验证建模。
根据所审查研究的结果,不存在“最佳”设计指南,但更可靠的种植体设计是可能的。本综述研究可以作为对牙种植体寿命进行更详细研究的起点。