Tewes Mitra, Peis Michael Wilhelm, Bogner Simon, Theysohn Jens M, Reinboldt Marcus Paul, Schuler Martin, Welt Anja
Department of Medical Oncology, West German Cancer Center, University Hospital Essen, University Duisburg Essen, 45122, Essen, Germany.
Department of Radiology, West German Cancer Center, University Hospital Essen, University Duisburg Essen, 45122, Essen, Germany.
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2017 Oct;143(10):2131-2141. doi: 10.1007/s00432-017-2462-y. Epub 2017 Jun 23.
Hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) is an option for patients with liver-predominant metastatic breast cancer (LMBC), when no further systemic treatment is available. But systematic reports are limited. Here we conducted a retrospective analysis of LMBC patients treated at an expert center.
Individual patient data were retrieved from the clinical data base of the West German Cancer Center. Primary endpoints included hepatic response (RECIST), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and toxicity. A score based on LDH, AST, ALT and bilirubine was developed to estimate the hepatic metastasis load.
Data from 70 consecutive patients were included. All patients were heavily pretreated (median 7 treatment lines for LMBC). HAIC protocols included mitomycin/5-FU (70%), mitomycin (14.3%), melphalan (12.9%) and 5-FU (7.1%), with selection based on patient characteristics. Partial hepatic remission was obtained as best response in 14 patients (20.0%), stable disease in 27 patients (38.6%), and progressive disease in 29 patients (41.4%). Median PFS and OS from initiation of HAIC were 2 (range 0-10) and 7 months (range 1-37). Mainly hepatic and hematopoietic HAIC-related toxicities were observed; there was no treatment-related death. The hepatic metastasis score effectively separated two prognostic groups: Patients with a score <3 had significantly superior PFS (15 vs 7 weeks, p = 0.017) and OS (12 vs 5 months, p = 0.002).
HAIC offers a safe and effective salvage treatment strategy in heavily pretreated patients with LMBC and no further treatment options. The hepatic metastasis score may help to identify patients with sustained clinical benefit.
对于以肝脏转移为主的转移性乳腺癌(LMBC)患者,在没有进一步的全身治疗方案时,肝动脉灌注化疗(HAIC)是一种选择。但系统性报告有限。在此,我们对一家专家中心治疗的LMBC患者进行了回顾性分析。
从西德癌症中心的临床数据库中检索个体患者数据。主要终点包括肝脏反应(RECIST)、无进展生存期(PFS)、总生存期(OS)和毒性。基于乳酸脱氢酶(LDH)、谷草转氨酶(AST)、谷丙转氨酶(ALT)和胆红素制定了一个评分系统,以评估肝转移负荷。
纳入了70例连续患者的数据。所有患者均经过大量预处理(LMBC的中位治疗线数为7)。HAIC方案包括丝裂霉素/5-氟尿嘧啶(5-FU)(70%)、丝裂霉素(14.3%)、美法仑(12.9%)和5-FU(7.1%),根据患者特征进行选择。14例患者(20.0%)的最佳反应为部分肝脏缓解,27例患者(38.6%)为疾病稳定,29例患者(41.4%)为疾病进展。从开始HAIC治疗起,PFS和OS的中位数分别为2个月(范围0 - 10个月)和7个月(范围1 - 37个月)。观察到主要是与HAIC相关的肝脏和血液系统毒性;没有与治疗相关的死亡。肝转移评分有效地将两个预后组区分开来:评分<3的患者PFS(15周对7周,p = 0.017)和OS(12个月对5个月,p = 0.002)显著更优。
HAIC为经过大量预处理且没有进一步治疗选择的LMBC患者提供了一种安全有效的挽救治疗策略。肝转移评分可能有助于识别能持续获得临床益处的患者。