• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种用于从现实情境中调查道德判断各个方面的简要评估工具。

A brief assessment tool for investigating facets of moral judgment from realistic vignettes.

机构信息

Psychology Department, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, IL, 61820, USA.

Computer Science Department, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana-Champaign, IL, USA.

出版信息

Behav Res Methods. 2018 Jun;50(3):922-936. doi: 10.3758/s13428-017-0917-3.

DOI:10.3758/s13428-017-0917-3
PMID:28646400
Abstract

Humans make moral judgments every day, and research demonstrates that these evaluations are based on a host of related event features (e.g., harm, legality). In order to acquire systematic data on how moral judgments are made, our assessments need to be expanded to include real-life, ecologically valid stimuli that take into account the numerous event features that are known to influence moral judgment. To facilitate this, Knutson et al. (in Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 5(4), 378-384, 2010) developed vignettes based on real-life episodic memories rated concurrently on key moral features; however, the method is time intensive (~1.4-3.4 h) and the stimuli and ratings require further validation and characterization. The present study addresses these limitations by: (i) validating three short subsets of these vignettes (39 per subset) that are time-efficient (10-25 min per subset) yet representative of the ratings and factor structure of the full set, (ii) norming ratings of moral features in a larger sample (total N = 661, each subset N = ~220 vs. Knutson et al. N = 30), (iii) examining the generalizability of the original factor structure by replicating it in a larger sample across vignette subsets, sex, and political ideology, and (iv) using latent profile analysis to empirically characterize vignette groupings based on event feature ratings profiles and vignette content. This study therefore provides researchers with a core battery of well-characterized and realistic vignettes, concurrently rated on key moral features that can be administered in a brief, time-efficient manner to advance research on the nature of moral judgment.

摘要

人们每天都会做出道德判断,研究表明这些评估是基于一系列相关的事件特征(例如,伤害、合法性)。为了获取关于道德判断是如何做出的系统数据,我们的评估需要扩展到包括现实生活中具有生态有效性的刺激物,这些刺激物需要考虑到许多已知会影响道德判断的事件特征。为了实现这一目标,Knutson 等人(在《社会认知与情感神经科学》杂志,第 5 卷,第 4 期,第 378-384 页,2010 年)根据同时根据关键道德特征进行评分的现实生活中的情景记忆来开发短文;然而,这种方法耗时(约 1.4-3.4 小时),并且刺激物和评分需要进一步验证和描述。本研究通过以下方式解决了这些限制:(i)验证三个简短的短文子集(每个子集 39 个短文),这些子集时间效率高(每个子集 10-25 分钟),但代表了完整集合的评分和因素结构;(ii)在更大的样本中对道德特征的评分进行标准化(总 N=661,每个子集 N=~220 与 Knutson 等人的 N=30);(iii)通过在更大的样本中跨短文子集、性别和政治意识形态复制原始因素结构来检验其可推广性;(iv)使用潜在剖面分析根据事件特征评分剖面和短文内容对短文分组进行实证描述。因此,本研究为研究人员提供了一组经过良好描述和现实的短文核心电池,这些短文同时根据关键道德特征进行评分,可以以简短、高效的方式进行管理,以推进关于道德判断本质的研究。

相似文献

1
A brief assessment tool for investigating facets of moral judgment from realistic vignettes.一种用于从现实情境中调查道德判断各个方面的简要评估工具。
Behav Res Methods. 2018 Jun;50(3):922-936. doi: 10.3758/s13428-017-0917-3.
2
Behavioral norms for condensed moral vignettes.简明道德事例行为规范。
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2010 Dec;5(4):378-84. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsq005. Epub 2010 Feb 12.
3
Moral foundations vignettes: a standardized stimulus database of scenarios based on moral foundations theory.道德基础短文:基于道德基础理论的情景标准化刺激数据库。
Behav Res Methods. 2015 Dec;47(4):1178-1198. doi: 10.3758/s13428-014-0551-2.
4
Moral judgment in episodic amnesia.情景性失忆中的道德判断。
Hippocampus. 2016 Aug;26(8):975-9. doi: 10.1002/hipo.22593. Epub 2016 Apr 30.
5
Moral emotions and moral judgments in children's narratives: comparing real-life and hypothetical transgressions.儿童叙事中的道德情感与道德判断:比较现实生活与假设性违规行为
New Dir Child Adolesc Dev. 2010 Fall;2010(129):11-31. doi: 10.1002/cd.273.
6
Developing brief versions of the Moral Foundations Vignettes using a genetic algorithm-based approach.基于遗传算法开发道德基础短片的简短版本。
Behav Res Methods. 2021 Jun;53(3):1179-1187. doi: 10.3758/s13428-020-01489-y. Epub 2020 Oct 1.
7
Moral judgment, political ideology and collective action.道德判断、政治意识形态与集体行动。
Scand J Psychol. 2018 Dec;59(6):610-620. doi: 10.1111/sjop.12479. Epub 2018 Aug 9.
8
Disruption on right temporoparietal junction with transcranial magnetic stimulation affects moral judgment: No difference between first- and third-personal narration with TMS.经颅磁刺激对右侧颞顶联合区的干扰会影响道德判断:经颅磁刺激下第一人称与第三人称叙述无差异。
Neuropsychologia. 2021 Jul 16;157:107858. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2021.107858. Epub 2021 Apr 20.
9
Deciphering moral intuition: How agents, deeds, and consequences influence moral judgment.解读道德直觉:代理人、行为和后果如何影响道德判断。
PLoS One. 2018 Oct 1;13(10):e0204631. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0204631. eCollection 2018.
10
Disentangling the Effect of Valence and Arousal on Judgments Concerning Moral Transgressions.厘清效价和唤醒对道德违规判断的影响。
Span J Psychol. 2015 Aug 10;18:E61. doi: 10.1017/sjp.2015.66.

引用本文的文献

1
Validation of the Russian version of the realistic moral vignettes for studies of moral judgments.用于道德判断研究的俄罗斯版现实道德 vignettes 的验证。
Behav Res Methods. 2025 May 30;57(7):184. doi: 10.3758/s13428-025-02709-z.
2
'It's not just immoral!': The role of moral disengagement and incivility in dehumanising the transgressor of immoral behaviour.“这不仅仅是不道德的!”:道德推脱和不文明行为在将不道德行为的违规者非人化过程中的作用。
PLoS One. 2025 May 7;20(5):e0322212. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0322212. eCollection 2025.