Szmukler George
Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, UK.
Int J Law Psychiatry. 2017 Sep-Oct;54:90-97. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2017.06.003. Epub 2017 Jun 21.
The UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities spells out in the most up-to-date and specific manner the rights of persons with disabilities. In doing so the Convention presents serious challenges to many conventional practices in respect of people with disabilities, especially those with mental health disabilities. According to a number of authorities, most notably the UN Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, 'substitute decision-making' is not consistent with the Convention. 'Respect for the rights, will and preferences' is to be regarded as the touchstone for compliance with the Convention. However 'will and preferences' is nowhere defined. This paper examines the meaning of these terms, and draws attention to instances where a contemporaneous 'preference' may be at variance with a person's 'will'. In such cases, it is argued, that 'substitute decision-making' - or giving effect to the person's 'will' - may be justified.
《联合国残疾人权利公约》以最新且最具体的方式阐明了残疾人的权利。在此过程中,该公约对许多关于残疾人的传统做法提出了严峻挑战,尤其是针对那些有精神健康残疾的人。据一些权威机构,最显著的是联合国残疾人权利委员会称,“替代决策”不符合该公约。“尊重权利、意愿和偏好”应被视为遵守该公约的试金石。然而,“意愿和偏好”在任何地方都没有被定义。本文探讨了这些术语的含义,并提请注意一些情况,即同时存在的“偏好”可能与一个人的“意愿”不一致。在这种情况下,有人认为,“替代决策”——或实现该人的“意愿”——可能是合理的。