Suppr超能文献

口服氨甲环酸与氨甲环酸微注射局部浸润治疗黄褐斑患者的疗效与安全性:一项对比研究。

Therapeutic efficacy and safety of oral tranexamic acid and that of tranexamic acid local infiltration with microinjections in patients with melasma: a comparative study.

作者信息

Sharma R, Mahajan V K, Mehta K S, Chauhan P S, Rawat R, Shiny T N

机构信息

Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Leprosy, Dr RP Govt Medical College, Kangra (Tanda), India.

出版信息

Clin Exp Dermatol. 2017 Oct;42(7):728-734. doi: 10.1111/ced.13164. Epub 2017 Jun 25.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Tranexamic acid (TXA) has been used orally, intravenously, topically and intradermally (microinjection, microneedling) for treating melasma. However, the comparative efficacy of these different routes of administration remains underevaluated.

AIM

To ascertain the comparative efficacy of different routes of administration of TXA.

METHODS

In total, 100 consecutive patients with melasma (8 men, 92 women, age range 18-55 years) were randomly assigned to one of two groups comprising 50 patients each. Group A (3 men, 47 women) received oral TXA 250 mg twice daily, while group B (5 men, 45 women) received intradermal microinjections of TXA 4 mg/mL every 4 weeks. The treatment continued for 12 weeks in both groups. Percentage reduction in baseline Melasma Area and Severity Index (MASI) was assessed at 4-week intervals, and response was scored as very good (> 75% reduction), good (50% to < 75% reduction), moderate (25% to < 50% reduction), mild (< 25% reduction) or no response.

RESULTS

The study was completed by 39 patients in group A and 41 patients in group B. Very good response was seen in 25 and 32 patients in groups A and B, respectively, while good response was seen in 14 and 9 patients, respectively. Both treatment methods were equally effective, with an average reduction of MASI at 12 weeks of 77.96 ± 9.39 in group A and 79.00 ± 9.64 in group B. The main adverse effects were mild epigastric discomfort, hypomenorrhea, headache and injection site pain, which did not warrant discontinuation of treatment. Two patients in group A had relapses at 24 weeks.

CONCLUSION

TXA appears to be an effective and safe treatment for melasma, irrespective of its route of administration.

摘要

背景

氨甲环酸(TXA)已被用于口服、静脉注射、局部外用和皮内注射(微注射、微针疗法)治疗黄褐斑。然而,这些不同给药途径的相对疗效仍未得到充分评估。

目的

确定氨甲环酸不同给药途径的相对疗效。

方法

总共100例连续的黄褐斑患者(8例男性,92例女性,年龄范围18 - 55岁)被随机分为两组,每组50例。A组(3例男性,47例女性)每日口服氨甲环酸250 mg,分两次服用,而B组(5例男性,45例女性)每4周接受一次4 mg/mL氨甲环酸的皮内微注射。两组治疗均持续12周。每隔4周评估基线黄褐斑面积和严重程度指数(MASI)的降低百分比,并将反应分为非常好(降低>75%)、好(降低50%至<75%)、中等(降低25%至<50%)、轻度(降低<25%)或无反应。

结果

A组39例患者和B组41例患者完成了研究。A组和B组分别有25例和32例患者反应非常好,分别有14例和9例患者反应良好。两种治疗方法同样有效,A组12周时MASI平均降低77.96±9.39,B组为79.00±9.64。主要不良反应为轻度上腹部不适、月经量减少、头痛和注射部位疼痛,均无需停药。A组有2例患者在24周时复发。

结论

无论给药途径如何,氨甲环酸似乎都是一种有效且安全的黄褐斑治疗方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验