Dewhurst Stephen A, Anderson Rachel J, Berry Donna M, Garner Sarah R
1 University of Hull, Hull, UK.
2 Keele University, Staffordshire, UK.
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2018 Jul;71(7):1637-1644. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2017.1345961. Epub 2018 Jan 1.
Previous research has highlighted the wide individual variability in susceptibility to the false memories produced by the Deese/Roediger-McDermott (DRM) procedure. This study investigated whether susceptibility to false memories is influenced by individual differences in the specificity of autobiographical memory retrieval. Memory specificity was measured using the Sentence Completion for Events from the Past Test (SCEPT). Memory specificity did not correlate with correct recognition, but a specific retrieval style was positively correlated with levels of false recognition. It is proposed that the contextual details that frequently accompany false memories of non-studied lures are more accessible in individuals with specific retrieval styles.
先前的研究强调了在对由迪斯/罗迪格-麦克德莫特（DRM）程序产生的错误记忆的易感性方面存在广泛的个体差异。本研究调查了对错误记忆的易感性是否受自传体记忆检索特异性的个体差异影响。使用过去事件句子完成测试（SCEPT）来测量记忆特异性。记忆特异性与正确识别无关，但一种特定的检索方式与错误识别水平呈正相关。有人提出，在具有特定检索方式的个体中，与未学习的诱饵的错误记忆经常伴随的情境细节更容易获取。
