1 Critical Care Medicine Department, Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
2 Department of Emergency Medicine, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, USA.
J Intensive Care Med. 2018 Jun;33(6):335-345. doi: 10.1177/0885066617714770. Epub 2017 Jun 26.
Smoke inhalation-associated acute lung injury (SI-ALI) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in victims of fire tragedies. To date, there are no evidence-based guidelines on ventilation strategies in acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) after smoke inhalation. We reviewed the existing literature for clinical studies of salvage mechanical ventilation (MV) strategies in patients with SI-ALI, focusing on mortality and pneumonia as outcomes.
A systematic search was designed in accordance with preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Risk of bias assessment was performed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale (NOS; 0 to 9 stars), with a score ≥7 being the threshold for inclusion in the meta-analysis. A systematic search strategy was used to search 10 databases. Clinical studies were included in which patients: (1) experienced smoke inhalation, (2) treated with MV, and (3) described a concurrent or historical control group.
A total of 226 potentially relevant studies were identified, of which 7 studies on high-frequency percussive ventilation (HFPV) met inclusion criteria. No studies met inclusion for meta-analysis (NOS ≥ 7). In studies comparing HFPV to conventional mechanical ventilation (CMV), mortality and pneumonia incidence improved in 3 studies and remained unchanged in 3 others. No change in ventilator days or ICU length of stay was observed; however, oxygenation and work of breathing improved with HFPV.
Mechanical ventilation in patients with SI-ALI has not been well studied. High-frequency percussive ventilation may decrease in-hospital mortality and pneumonia incidence when compared to CMV. The absence of "good" quality evidence precluded meta-analysis. Based upon low-quality evidence, there was a very weak recommendation that HFPV use may be associated with lower mortality and pneumonia rates in patients with SI-ALI. Given SI-ALI's unique underlying pathophysiology, and its potential implications on therapy, randomized controlled studies are required to ensure that patients receive the safest and most effective care.
The study was registered with PROSPERO International prospective register of systematic reviews (#47015).
吸入烟雾相关的急性肺损伤(SI-ALI)是火灾事故受害者发病率和死亡率的主要原因。迄今为止,尚无关于吸入烟雾后急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)通气策略的循证指南。我们回顾了现有的关于 SI-ALI 患者抢救性机械通气(MV)策略的临床研究文献,重点关注死亡率和肺炎作为结局。
按照系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)指南设计了系统检索。使用纽卡斯尔-渥太华质量评估量表(NOS;0 到 9 星)进行偏倚风险评估,得分≥7 为纳入荟萃分析的阈值。使用系统检索策略搜索了 10 个数据库。纳入的临床研究中,患者:(1)经历过烟雾吸入,(2)接受 MV 治疗,(3)描述了同期或历史对照。
共确定了 226 篇可能相关的研究,其中 7 项关于高频喷射通气(HFPV)的研究符合纳入标准。没有研究符合纳入荟萃分析的标准(NOS≥7)。在比较 HFPV 与常规机械通气(CMV)的研究中,3 项研究中死亡率和肺炎发生率改善,3 项研究中无变化。未观察到呼吸机天数或 ICU 住院时间的变化;然而,HFPV 改善了氧合和呼吸做功。
SI-ALI 患者的机械通气尚未得到很好的研究。与 CMV 相比,高频喷射通气可能降低住院死亡率和肺炎发生率。由于缺乏“高质量”证据,无法进行荟萃分析。基于低质量证据,有一个非常微弱的建议,即 HFPV 的使用可能与 SI-ALI 患者的死亡率和肺炎发生率降低相关。鉴于 SI-ALI 独特的潜在病理生理学及其对治疗的潜在影响,需要进行随机对照研究,以确保患者得到最安全和最有效的治疗。
该研究在 PROSPERO 国际系统评价注册中心(#47015)注册。