Walker Robin L, Ghali William A, Chen Guanmin, Khalsa Tej K, Mangat Birinder K, Campbell Norm R C, Dixon Elijah, Rabi Doreen, Jette Nathalie, Dhanoa Robyn, Quan Hude
Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, 3280 Hospital Dr. NW, Calgary, AB, T2N 4Z6, Canada.
O'Brien Institute for Public Health, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada.
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2017 Jun 26;17(1):90. doi: 10.1186/s12911-017-0487-4.
With high-quality community-based primary care, hospitalizations for ambulatory care sensitive conditions (ACSC) are considered avoidable. The purpose of this study was to test the inter-physician reliability of judgments of avoidable hospitalizations for one ACSC, uncomplicated hypertension, derived from medical chart review.
We applied the Canadian Institute for Health Information's case definition to obtain a random sample of patients who had an ACSC hospitalization for uncomplicated hypertension in Calgary, Alberta. Medical chart review was conducted by three experienced internal medicine specialists. Implicit methods were used to judge avoidability of hospitalization using a validated 5-point scale.
There was poor agreement among three physicians raters when judging the avoidability of 82 ACSC hospitalizations for uncomplicated hypertension (κ = 0.092). The κ also remained low when assessing agreement between raters 1 and 3 (κ = 0.092), but the κ was lower (less than chance agreement) for raters 1 and 2 (κ = -0.119) and raters 2 and 3 (κ = -0.008). When the 5-point scale was dichotomized, there was fair agreement among three raters (κ = 0.217). The proportion of ACSC hospitalizations for uncomplicated hypertension that were rated as avoidable was 32.9%, 6.1% and 26.8% for raters 1, 2, and 3, respectively.
This study found a low proportion of ACSC hospitalization were rated as avoidable, with poor to fair agreement of judgment between physician raters. This suggests that the validity and utility of this health indicator is questionable. It points to a need to abandon the use of ACSC entirely; or alternatively to work on the development of explicit criteria for judging avoidability of hospitalization for ACSC such as hypertension.
在高质量的社区初级医疗服务体系下,因非卧床护理敏感病症(ACSC)而住院被认为是可以避免的。本研究的目的是检验通过病历审查得出的针对一种ACSC(单纯性高血压)的可避免住院判断在医生之间的可靠性。
我们采用加拿大健康信息研究所的病例定义,从阿尔伯塔省卡尔加里市因单纯性高血压而发生ACSC住院的患者中随机抽取样本。由三位经验丰富的内科专家进行病历审查。采用隐性方法,使用经过验证的5分制量表来判断住院的可避免性。
在判断82例因单纯性高血压而发生的ACSC住院的可避免性时,三位医生评分者之间的一致性较差(κ = 0.092)。在评估评分者1和评分者3之间的一致性时,κ值也较低(κ = 0.092),但评分者1和评分者2之间(κ = -0.119)以及评分者2和评分者3之间(κ = -0.008)的κ值更低(低于机遇一致性)。当将5分制量表进行二分法划分时,三位评分者之间有合理的一致性(κ = 0.217)。评分者1、2和3分别将因单纯性高血压而发生的ACSC住院评为可避免的比例为32.9%、6.1%和26.8%。
本研究发现,被评为可避免的ACSC住院比例较低,医生评分者之间的判断一致性从差到合理。这表明该健康指标的有效性和实用性值得怀疑。这表明要么完全放弃使用ACSC;要么致力于制定明确的标准,用于判断诸如高血压等ACSC住院的可避免性。