English Tammy, Lee Ihno A, John Oliver P, Gross James J
Department of Psychological and Brain Science, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Department of Psychology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Motiv Emot. 2017 Apr;41(2):230-242. doi: 10.1007/s11031-016-9597-z. Epub 2016 Dec 8.
Recent studies have begun to document the diversity of ways people regulate their emotions. However, one unanswered question is why people regulate their emotions as they do in everyday life. In the present research, we examined how social context and goals influence strategy selection in daily high points and low points. As expected, suppression was particularly tied to social features of context: it was used more when others were present, especially non-close partners, and when people had instrumental goals, especially more interpersonal ones (e.g., avoid conflict). Distraction and reappraisal were used more when regulating for hedonic reasons (e.g., to feel better), but these strategies were also linked to certain instrumental goals (e.g., getting work done). When contra-hedonic regulation occurred, it primarily took the form of dampening positive emotion during high points. Suppression was more likely to be used for contra-hedonic regulation, whereas reappraisal and distraction were used more for pro-hedonic regulation. Overall, these findings highlight the social nature of emotion regulation and underscore the importance of examining regulation in both positive and negative contexts.
近期研究已开始记录人们调节情绪的多种方式。然而,一个尚未得到解答的问题是,人们为何在日常生活中以他们所采用的方式调节情绪。在本研究中,我们考察了社会背景和目标如何在日常生活的高潮和低谷中影响策略选择。不出所料,压抑尤其与情境的社会特征相关:当他人在场时,尤其是非亲密伙伴,以及当人们有工具性目标时,尤其是更多人际性目标(如避免冲突)时,人们更多地使用压抑策略。当出于享乐原因进行调节时(如感觉更好),人们更多地使用分心和重新评价策略,但这些策略也与某些工具性目标相关(如完成工作)。当出现反享乐调节时,它主要表现为在高潮时抑制积极情绪。压抑更有可能被用于反享乐调节,而重新评价和分心更多地用于促进享乐调节。总体而言,这些发现凸显了情绪调节的社会本质,并强调了在积极和消极情境中考察情绪调节的重要性。