• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

头孢替坦与头孢唑林预防择期胆囊切除术后伤口感染的比较。

A comparison of cefotetan and cephazolin for prophylaxis against wound infection after elective cholecystectomy.

作者信息

Drumm J, Donovan I A, Wise R

出版信息

J Hosp Infect. 1985 Sep;6(3):277-80.

PMID:2865292
Abstract

In a prospective randomized study 168 patients received a single dose of either cephazolin or cefotetan (1 g) as a prophylactic against wound infection after cholecystectomy. In the cephazolin group 10.3% and the cefotetan group 14.4% developed wound infections (Chi-squared = 0.34 P = less than 0.6 greater than 0.5).

摘要

在一项前瞻性随机研究中,168例患者在胆囊切除术后接受单剂量头孢唑林或头孢替坦(1克)预防伤口感染。头孢唑林组伤口感染发生率为10.3%,头孢替坦组为14.4%(卡方检验=0.34,P值小于0.6大于0.5)。

相似文献

1
A comparison of cefotetan and cephazolin for prophylaxis against wound infection after elective cholecystectomy.头孢替坦与头孢唑林预防择期胆囊切除术后伤口感染的比较。
J Hosp Infect. 1985 Sep;6(3):277-80.
2
A comparative trial between cefotetan and cephazolin for wound sepsis prophylaxis during elective upper gastrointestinal surgery with an investigation of cefotetan penetration into the obstructed biliary tree.头孢替坦与头孢唑林在择期上消化道手术中预防伤口感染的比较试验,并研究头孢替坦在梗阻性胆管树中的渗透情况。
J Hosp Infect. 1986 May;7(3):269-76. doi: 10.1016/0195-6701(86)90077-0.
3
Prophylactic antibiotics for elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy: are they necessary?择期腹腔镜胆囊切除术预防性使用抗生素:有必要吗?
Arch Surg. 1999 Jun;134(6):611-3; discussion 614. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.134.6.611.
4
Multicenter open trial of cefotetan and cefoxitin in elective biliary surgery.
Am J Surg. 1988 May 31;155(5A):77-80. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9610(88)80218-6.
5
Prophylaxis in gynaecological and obstetric surgery: a comparative randomised multicentre study of single-dose cefotetan versus two doses of cefazolin.妇产科手术中的预防措施:头孢替坦单剂量与头孢唑林两剂量的比较随机多中心研究。
Chemioterapia. 1988 Aug;7(4):245-52.
6
Prophylactic use of cephazolin against wound sepsis after cholecystectomy.头孢唑林预防胆囊切除术后伤口脓毒症的应用
Br Med J. 1977 May 14;1(6071):1254-6. doi: 10.1136/bmj.1.6071.1254.
7
Cefazolin is inferior to cefotetan as single-dose prophylaxis for women undergoing elective total abdominal hysterectomy.对于接受择期全腹子宫切除术的女性,头孢唑林作为单剂量预防用药不如头孢替坦。
Clin Infect Dis. 1995 Mar;20(3):677-84. doi: 10.1093/clinids/20.3.677.
8
Comparison of cefotetan and cefoxitin as prophylaxis in cesarean section.头孢替坦与头孢西丁在剖宫产术中预防性应用的比较。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1986 Apr;154(4):951-4. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(86)90496-5.
9
[Comparative study of short-term antimicrobial chemoprophylaxis in gynecologic surgery: cefotetan versus cefazolin].
Minerva Ginecol. 1989 Mar;41(3):149-55.
10
Cefotetan versus cefoxitin as prophylaxis in hysterectomy.头孢替坦与头孢西丁用于子宫切除术预防感染的比较
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1986 Apr;154(4):960-3. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(86)90498-9.

引用本文的文献

1
Prospective Control Study of Clinical Effectiveness of Prophylactic Antibiotics in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy on Infection Rate.前瞻性对照研究预防性抗生素在腹腔镜胆囊切除术中对感染率的临床效果。
Yonsei Med J. 2021 Feb;62(2):172-176. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2021.62.2.172.
2
Cefotetan: a second-generation cephalosporin active against anaerobic bacteria. Committee on Antimicrobial Agents, Canadian Infectious Disease Society.头孢替坦:一种对厌氧菌有效的第二代头孢菌素。抗菌药物委员会,加拿大传染病协会。
CMAJ. 1994 Sep 1;151(5):537-42.
3
Prophylaxis of postoperative infections.
术后感染的预防
Infection. 1991;19 Suppl 6:S337-44. doi: 10.1007/BF01715775.