• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

注意力焦点会影响叙事性阅读中事件的分割与更新方式。

Attentional focus affects how events are segmented and updated in narrative reading.

作者信息

Bailey Heather R, Kurby Christopher A, Sargent Jesse Q, Zacks Jeffrey M

机构信息

Kansas State University, 414 Bluemont Hall, Manhattan, KS, 66506, USA.

Washington University, St. Louis, MO, USA.

出版信息

Mem Cognit. 2017 Aug;45(6):940-955. doi: 10.3758/s13421-017-0707-2.

DOI:10.3758/s13421-017-0707-2
PMID:28653273
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8684441/
Abstract

Readers generate situation models representing described events, but the nature of these representations may differ depending on the reading goals. We assessed whether instructions to pay attention to different situational dimensions affect how individuals structure their situation models (Exp. 1) and how they update these models when situations change (Exp. 2). In Experiment 1, participants read and segmented narrative texts into events. Some readers were oriented to pay specific attention to characters or space. Sentences containing character or spatial-location changes were perceived as event boundaries-particularly if the reader was oriented to characters or space, respectively. In Experiment 2, participants read narratives and responded to recognition probes throughout the texts. Readers who were oriented to the spatial dimension were more likely to update their situation models at spatial changes; all readers tracked the character dimension. The results from both experiments indicated that attention to individual situational dimensions influences how readers segment and update their situation models. More broadly, the results provide evidence for a global situation model updating mechanism that serves to set up new models at important narrative changes.

摘要

读者会生成代表所描述事件的情境模型,但这些表征的性质可能因阅读目标而异。我们评估了关注不同情境维度的指示是否会影响个体构建其情境模型的方式(实验1)以及当情境发生变化时他们如何更新这些模型(实验2)。在实验1中,参与者阅读叙事文本并将其分割成事件。一些读者被引导特别关注人物或空间。包含人物或空间位置变化的句子被视为事件边界——尤其是当读者分别被引导关注人物或空间时。在实验2中,参与者阅读叙事文本并在整个文本中对识别探针做出反应。被引导关注空间维度的读者在空间变化时更有可能更新他们的情境模型;所有读者都追踪人物维度。两个实验的结果都表明,对个体情境维度的关注会影响读者分割和更新其情境模型的方式。更广泛地说,这些结果为一种全局情境模型更新机制提供了证据,该机制用于在重要的叙事变化时建立新模型。

相似文献

1
Attentional focus affects how events are segmented and updated in narrative reading.注意力焦点会影响叙事性阅读中事件的分割与更新方式。
Mem Cognit. 2017 Aug;45(6):940-955. doi: 10.3758/s13421-017-0707-2.
2
Starting from scratch and building brick by brick in comprehension.从零开始,逐步提高理解能力。
Mem Cognit. 2012 Jul;40(5):812-26. doi: 10.3758/s13421-011-0179-8.
3
Situation model updating in young and older adults: Global versus incremental mechanisms.年轻人和老年人的情境模型更新:全局机制与增量机制
Psychol Aging. 2015 Jun;30(2):232-44. doi: 10.1037/a0039081. Epub 2015 May 4.
4
Segmentation in reading and film comprehension.阅读与电影理解中的分段。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2009 May;138(2):307-27. doi: 10.1037/a0015305.
5
The construction of visual-spatial situation models in children's reading and their relation to reading comprehension.儿童阅读中视觉-空间情境模型的构建及其与阅读理解的关系。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2014 Mar;119:101-11. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2013.10.011. Epub 2013 Dec 6.
6
Revising what readers know: updating text representations during narrative comprehension.修正读者已知内容:叙事理解过程中更新文本表征
Mem Cognit. 2007 Dec;35(8):2019-32. doi: 10.3758/bf03192934.
7
Aging and perceived event structure as a function of modality.老化和感知事件结构作为模态的函数。
Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn. 2012;19(1-2):264-82. doi: 10.1080/13825585.2011.633159. Epub 2011 Dec 19.
8
Predictability of locomotion: effects on updating of spatial situation models during narrative comprehension.运动的可预测性:对叙事理解过程中空间情境模型更新的影响。
Mem Cognit. 2006 Sep;34(6):1193-205. doi: 10.3758/bf03193265.
9
The role of reader age and focus of attention in creating situation models from narratives.读者年龄和注意力焦点在从叙事中构建情境模型方面的作用。
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 1997 Mar;52(2):P73-80. doi: 10.1093/geronb/52b.2.p73.
10
Narrative event boundaries, reading times, and expectation.叙事事件边界、阅读时间与期望
Mem Cognit. 2016 Oct;44(7):1064-75. doi: 10.3758/s13421-016-0619-6.

引用本文的文献

1
Event perception and event memory in real-world experience.现实世界体验中的事件感知与事件记忆。
Nat Rev Psychol. 2024 Nov;3(11):754-766. doi: 10.1038/s44159-024-00367-0. Epub 2024 Oct 10.
2
Neural state changes during movie watching relate to episodic memory in younger and older adults.观影过程中的神经状态变化与年轻人和老年人的情景记忆有关。
Cereb Cortex. 2025 May 1;35(5). doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhaf114.
3
Free recall is shaped by inference and scaffolded by event structure.自由回忆受推理影响,并以事件结构为支撑。

本文引用的文献

1
Situation model updating in young and older adults: Global versus incremental mechanisms.年轻人和老年人的情境模型更新:全局机制与增量机制
Psychol Aging. 2015 Jun;30(2):232-44. doi: 10.1037/a0039081. Epub 2015 May 4.
2
The Interplay of Reader Goals, Working Memory, and Text Structure During Reading.阅读过程中读者目标、工作记忆与文本结构的相互作用
Contemp Educ Psychol. 2014 Jul 1;39(3):206-219. doi: 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2014.05.003.
3
Tracking spatial information during reading: a cue-based process.阅读过程中空间信息的追踪:基于线索的过程。
Commun Psychol. 2025 Apr 26;3(1):71. doi: 10.1038/s44271-025-00243-4.
4
The Appraisal Model of Conspiracy Theories (AMCT): Applying Appraisal Theories to Understand Emotional and Behavioral Reactions to Conspiracy Theories.阴谋论评估模型(AMCT):应用评估理论理解对阴谋论的情绪和行为反应
Psychol Inq. 2025 Mar 13;35(3-4):159-178. doi: 10.1080/1047840X.2024.2442906. eCollection 2024.
5
Large-scale study of human memory for meaningful narratives.对有意义叙事的人类记忆的大规模研究。
Learn Mem. 2025 Feb 21;32(2). doi: 10.1101/lm.054043.124. Print 2025 Feb.
6
Events shape long-term memory for story information.事件塑造了对故事信息的长期记忆。
Discourse Process. 2023;60(2):141-161. doi: 10.1080/0163853x.2023.2185408. Epub 2023 Mar 27.
7
Individual differences in neural event segmentation of continuous experiences.个体在连续体验的神经事件分割上的差异。
Cereb Cortex. 2023 Jun 20;33(13):8164-8178. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhad106.
8
Shared neural representations and temporal segmentation of political content predict ideological similarity.共享的神经表示和政治内容的时间分割预测了意识形态的相似性。
Sci Adv. 2023 Feb 3;9(5):eabq5920. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abq5920. Epub 2023 Feb 1.
9
The effects of contextual certainty on tension induction and resolution.情境确定性对紧张感诱导与缓解的影响。
Cogn Neurodyn. 2023 Feb;17(1):191-201. doi: 10.1007/s11571-022-09810-5. Epub 2022 Apr 23.
10
Contextual inference in learning and memory.语境推理在学习和记忆中的作用。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2023 Jan;27(1):43-64. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2022.10.004. Epub 2022 Nov 24.
Mem Cognit. 2012 Jul;40(5):791-801. doi: 10.3758/s13421-012-0190-8.
4
Starting from scratch and building brick by brick in comprehension.从零开始,逐步提高理解能力。
Mem Cognit. 2012 Jul;40(5):812-26. doi: 10.3758/s13421-011-0179-8.
5
Reading times and the detection of event shift processing.阅读时间与事件移位加工的检测。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2010 Jan;36(1):210-6. doi: 10.1037/a0017258.
6
Segmentation in reading and film comprehension.阅读与电影理解中的分段。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2009 May;138(2):307-27. doi: 10.1037/a0015305.
7
Time travel through language: temporal shifts rapidly decrease information accessibility during reading.穿越语言的时间之旅:阅读过程中的时态转换会迅速降低信息的可获取性。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2008 Aug;15(4):750-6. doi: 10.3758/pbr.15.4.750.
8
Event perception: a mind-brain perspective.事件感知:一种心智-大脑视角
Psychol Bull. 2007 Mar;133(2):273-93. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.133.2.273.
9
Assessing the influence of dimensional focus during situation model construction.评估情境模型构建过程中维度焦点的影响。
Mem Cognit. 2006 Jan;34(1):78-89. doi: 10.3758/bf03193388.
10
Who when where: an experimental test of the event-indexing model.何人、何时、何地:事件索引模型的一项实验测试。
Mem Cognit. 2003 Dec;31(8):1284-92. doi: 10.3758/bf03195811.