Ariadne Labs, a Joint Center between Brigham and Women's Hospital and the Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
Population Services International, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Glob Health Sci Pract. 2017 Jun 27;5(2):217-231. doi: 10.9745/GHSP-D-16-00410.
Adherence to evidence-based essential birth practices is critical for improving health outcomes for mothers and newborns. The WHO Safe Childbirth Checklist (SCC) incorporates these practices, which occur during 4 critical pause points: on admission, before pushing (or cesarean delivery), soon after birth, and before discharge. A peer-coaching strategy to support consistent use of the SCC may be an effective approach to increase birth attendants' adherence to these practices.
We assessed data from 60 public health facilities in Uttar Pradesh, India, that received an 8-month staggered coaching intervention from December 2014 to September 2016 as part of the BetterBirth Trial, which is studying effectiveness of an SCC-centered intervention on maternal and neonatal harm. Nurse coaches recorded birth attendants' adherence to 39 essential birth practices. Practice adherence was calculated for each intervention month. After 2 months of coaching, a subsample of 15 facilities was selected for independent observation when the coach was not present. We compared adherence to the 18 practices recorded by both coaches and independent observers.
Coaches observed birth attendants' behavior during 5,971 deliveries. By the final month of the intervention, 35 of 39 essential birth practices had achieved >90% adherence in the presence of a coach, compared with only 7 of 39 practices during the first month. Key behaviors with the greatest improvement included explanation of danger signs, temperature measurement, assessment of fetal heart sounds, initiation of skin-to-skin contact, and breastfeeding. Without a coach present, birth attendants' average adherence to practices and checklist use was 24 percentage points lower than when a coach was present (range: -1% to 62%).
Implementation of the WHO Safe Childbirth Checklist with coaching improved uptake of and adherence to essential birth practices. Coordination and communication among facility staff, as well as behaviors with an immediate, tangible benefit, showed the greatest improvement. Difficult-to-perform behaviors and those with delayed or theoretical benefits were less likely to be sustained without a coach present. Coaching may be an important component in implementing the Safe Childbirth Checklist at scale.Note: At the time of publication of this article, the results of evaluation of the impact of the BetterBirth intervention were pending publication in another journal. After the impact findings have been published, we will update this article on the effect of the intervention on birth practices with a reference to the impact findings.
坚持循证基本分娩实践对于改善母婴健康结果至关重要。世卫组织的《安全分娩核对表》(SCC)纳入了这些实践,这些实践发生在 4 个关键暂停点:入院时、开始用力时(或剖宫产时)、分娩后不久和出院前。同伴指导策略支持一致使用 SCC 可能是提高接生员遵守这些实践的有效方法。
我们评估了来自印度北方邦 60 家公共卫生机构的数据,这些机构在 2014 年 12 月至 2016 年 9 月期间接受了为期 8 个月的交错指导干预,作为研究 SCC 为中心的干预措施对母婴伤害的有效性的 BetterBirth 试验的一部分。护士指导员记录了接生员对 39 项基本分娩实践的遵守情况。在每个干预月计算实践的遵守情况。在指导后两个月,当指导员不在场时,从 15 个设施中选择了一个子样本进行独立观察。我们比较了指导员和独立观察员记录的 18 项实践的遵守情况。
指导员在 5971 次分娩中观察了接生员的行为。在干预的最后一个月,有教练在场时,39 项基本分娩实践中有 35 项达到了>90%的遵守率,而第一个月只有 7 项实践达到了这一水平。最大改进的关键行为包括解释危险迹象、测量体温、评估胎儿心跳声音、开始皮肤接触和母乳喂养。没有指导员在场时,接生员对实践和核对表使用的平均遵守率比指导员在场时低 24 个百分点(范围:-1%至 62%)。
通过指导实施世卫组织《安全分娩核对表》提高了基本分娩实践的采用率和遵守率。设施工作人员之间的协调和沟通,以及具有直接、有形效益的行为,显示出最大的改进。没有指导员在场时,不太可能持续进行难以执行的行为和具有延迟或理论效益的行为。指导可能是在大规模实施《安全分娩核对表》方面的一个重要组成部分。
在本文发表时,BetterBirth 干预影响的评估结果尚未在另一份期刊上发表。在影响结果发表后,我们将在本文中更新关于干预对分娩实践的影响的信息,并引用影响结果。